Skip to content
International Brotherhood of 063 TCWH at a glance

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of 063 TCWH

To organize all workers and to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organization , negotiations and collective bargaining.

$98k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$164kPhilanthropy$106kYouth Development$72kCivil Rights$58kHousing & Shelter$54kEmployment$21kHealth$10k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $15,685, the rows itemized in this filing. The $97,657 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $81,972 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Teamsters Scholarship Fund$10,000
Youth Helpers$5,685
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Labor Community Services: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$389k · 5 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$389k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+4%

Still filing today

100%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHealthReligionHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    The Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc
    5× · 2018–2023 · $106k · revenue +13% · 29% of their budget
  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +26%
  • YH
    YOUTH HELPERS INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $72k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • NO
    No on Prop 22 Sponsored by L
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • TL
    TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • LC
    LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM OF LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Teamsters Local Union 769 Scholarship Fund

The Scholarship Fund conducts an annual golf tournament to raise money for scholarships for students.

Education
2
Teamsters Local 830 Scholarship Fund

To provide financial assistance to members of teamsters local 830 who are employed by participating employers and to the members' dependent children who have demonstrated scholastic ability, good character and qualities of leadership and…

—
3
Laborers' Local 300 Scholarship Fund

To provide scholarships for families of local union members.

Education
4
Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen & Helpers- Local No 773

To organize workers and to secure improved wages, benefits and working conditions.

—
5
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.

—
6
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 137

Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.

—
7
Teamsters Local 399 Charity Fund Inc

The specific purpose of this corporation is to raise funds for educational scholarships and for donation to charitable organizations that promote the commongood and welfare of working people in this country or that otherwise provide goods…

Philanthropy
8
California State Council of Service Employees

The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.

—
9
Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated With Ibt

To organize all workers eligible for membership, regardless of religion, race, creed, color, national origin, age or sex. to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organization, negotiation…

—
10
Teamsters' Joint Council No 7

To promote better working conditions for members.

—
11
Chauffeurs Teamsters & Helpers Local 391

Labor union local-see form 990 part iii, line 4a

—
12
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffers Warehousemen Local No 554

The organization is a local teamsters union whose mission is to represent their union members in negotioations with employers.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is James R Hoffa Memorial Scholarship Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Colette's Children's Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $100,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS…JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $57,000 · EducationJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUN…Teamsters Local 701 Scholarship Fund: $6,500 · EducationThe Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $106,000 · PhilanthropyThe Southern California …YOUTH HELPERS INC: $72,412 · ReligionYOUTH HELPERS IN…No on Prop 22 Sponsored by L: $50,000 · OtherNo on Prop 22 Sp…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE: $7,500 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIA…TEAMSTERS NATIONAL BLACK CAUCUS: $5,500 · OtherTEAMSTERS NATION…LOS ANGELES COUNTY FEDERATION OF LABOR AFL-CIO: $5,500 · OtherLOS ANGELES COUN…COLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $54,000 · Housing & ShelterCOLETTE'S CH…TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $10,000 · HealthLABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM OF LOS ANGELES: $10,000 · Human Services
Education$163,500Philanthropy$106,000Religion$72,412Other$68,500Housing & Shelter$54,000Health$10,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $106,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $100,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetYOUTH HELPERS INC: $72,412 over 6y, 21% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $57,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCOLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $54,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM OF LOS ANGELES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTeamsters Local 701 Scholarship Fund: $6,500 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetTEAMSTERS NATIONAL BLACK CAUCUS: $5,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES COUNTY FEDERATION OF LABOR AFL-CIO: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Teamsters Local 986 C…Teamsters Local 1932International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…Teamsters Local 399 C…International Brother…Teamsters Union Local…
Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund IncCA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc · Teamsters Local 1932 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 · International Brotherhood of 572 TCWH · International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · International Brotherhood of 911 TCWH · Teamsters Local 399 Charity Fund Inc · International Brotherhood of 848 Tcwh · Teamsters Union Local No 1150

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of 063 TCWH funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of 063 TCWH. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Brotherhood of 063 TCWH’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home