· Public charity
International Association of Lions 3602
To serve and support the local community, promote social union, and encourage civic participation by doing the most good for the most people.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $128,950 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $155,866 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,916 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $107k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MUSEUMS OF WESTERN COLORADO | $30,000 |
| MARILLAC HEALTH | $25,000 |
| COLORADO DISCOVER ABILITY | $25,000 |
| MESA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 51 | $16,950 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| GV EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING | $8,500 |
| GRAND MESA LITTLE LEAGUE | $7,500 |
| HOPEWEST | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMARILLAC CLINIC INC2× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +56%
- CFCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK4× · 2019–2025 · $33k · revenue +190%
- LLLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC3× · 2018–2025 · $32k · revenue +149%
Funded once
- CHCommunity Hospital Foundationone grant, 2022 · $45k · revenue -25%
- LVLOWER VALLEY FIRE DISTRICTone grant, 2023 · $45k
- GBGJ BLACKOUTone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the grand junction economic partnership is to generate high quality economic development by attracting business and quality jobs to mesa county, colorado.
To protect and enhance agricultural land, wildlife habitat and scenic lands in western colorado to benefit the community at large, enrich lives, and provide opportunities for outdoor recreation for future generations.
COMBA is dedicated to protecting and improving mountain biking on the Colorado Front Range.
To develop and increase charitable giving that connects donors to community needs in Southwest Colorado and to support the nonprofit sector through granting and educational opportunities.
To enhance youth programming, education and experiences at the colorado state fair.
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
To empower visitors and locals to explore, learn about and protect the spectacular public lands of Southwest Colorado.
Education for youth throughout mesa county, co
To meet human service needs
The Grand Foundation is a philanthropic organization serving all of Grand County, Colorado. The Foundation seeks to improve the quality of life in Grand County by proactively addressing current and future needs in the areas of Health &…
Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.
Educate the general public about important policy issues.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Little League Baseball Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WESTERN COLORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MARILLAC CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT 51 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Community Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF WESTERN COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds GJ BLACKOUT ↗
- Who funds MESA COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Clifton Christian Church Food Bank ↗
- Who funds COLORADO DISCOVER ABILITY ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds HARMONY ACRES EQUESTRIAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds MESA YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds KARIS INC ↗
- Who funds HopeWest ↗
- Who funds Western Colorado Drag Racing Assn Inc ↗
- Who funds EUREKA MCCONNELL SCIENCE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds COLORADO NATIONAL MONUMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Camp Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds MESA YOUTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Western Slope Center For Children ↗
- Who funds GRAND JUNCTION SOCCER CLUB ↗
- Who funds KIDS AID KIDS AID ↗
- Who funds GRAND VALLEY EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds GRAND VALLEY PUBLIC RADIO COMPANY ↗
- Who funds HILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ENRICHED COMMUNICATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND VALLEY YOUTH FOOTBALL INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN LIONS EYE BANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · United Way of Mesa County Inc · The Goodwin Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · St Mary's Hospital & Medical Center Inc · Gates Family Foundation · Bacon Family Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Thrift Shop of Fruita Inc · Gary and Colettie Cranston Family Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization International Association of Lions 3602 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.