Skip to content
Interlakes Area United Way Corp at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Interlakes Area United Way Corp

Interlakes area united way coordinates financial and volunteer resources for non-profit agencies and programs in southeastern south dakota.

$112k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$252kPublic Benefit$60kHealth$59kYouth Development$52kArts & Culture$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kEducation$16kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $102,197, the rows itemized in this filing. The $112,197 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$9,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$145k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISC$42,697
Individual grant recipient$12,000
MOODY COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$10,000
EAST DAKOTA TRANSIT$9,200
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK$8,000
VALIANT LIVING$7,500
THE WHOLENESS CENTER$7,200
THE BREADBASKET$5,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILDREN'S CARE CORNER: $6k → 12%ICAP: $19k → 10%CHILDREN'S CARE CORNER: $6k → 12%ICAP: $17k → 10%CHILDREN'S CARE CORNER: $5k → 12%ICAP: $14k → 10%ICAP: $11k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK: $8k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK: $7k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK: $6k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK: $6k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$461k · 10 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$461k
$29k

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPublic BenefitEmploymentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INTER-LAKES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $60k · revenue +48%
  • ED
    EAST DAKOTA TRANSIT INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +11%
  • VL
    VALIANT LIVING INCORPORATED
    6× · 2019–2024 · $59k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • RS
    RUTLAND SCHOOL & COMMUNITY LIBRARY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • IS
    INTERLAKES SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • TL
    TRINITY LUTHERAN PRESCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Douglas County Developmental Achievement Center

To serve disabled adults by providing job and living skills

Human Services
2
Eastern Star Home of South Dakota Incorporated

Provide quality care and services to residents in assisted living and nursing home facilities.

—
3
The Dwelling Place of Vermilion County

Serving as n advocate for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness, the dwelling place of vermilion county serves as a connection to services which have a positive impact on their life's journey.

Human Services
4
South Dakota Coalition Ending Domestic and Sexual Violence

To provide training and assistance to shelters for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.

—
5
Sheltered Living Inc

Sheltered Living Inc supports the efforts of individuals with intellectual disabilities to achieve independence and actively participate in the community.

Human Services
6
Butler Valley Inc

Provides day care and twenty-four hour live-in facilities for developmental disabled adults.

Health
7
Moulton Development Corporation

To provide low rent housing in Moulton, Iowa.

—
8
New Directions of Decatur County Inc

We are a domestic violence shelter, providing emergency, residential and nonresidential services: 24 hour victims hot-line; advocacy and education for victims of domestic violence in our community.

Health
9
Eastland County Crisis Center Inc

To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.

Human Services
10
Safe Haven of Person County

Home for women and children who suffer from domestic violence.

Human Services
11
Counterpoint Inc

Counterpoint offers intensive and standard work/day services and supported employment services. Counterpoint also offers three types of residential services: intensive group home, standard group home, and independent living supports.

—
12
Diversified Services Inc

To provide training and independent living skills to individuals with development disabilities so they may become as self-reliant as possible and lead more meaningful lives in the community.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inter-Lakes Community Action Partnership Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wholeness Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISC: $121,063 · OtherMISCMOODY COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $52,260 · OtherMOODY COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUBTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $24,276 · OtherTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATIONAMERICAN RED CROSS: $21,620 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSWholeness Center: $13,725 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherRUTLAND SCHOOL & COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $18,800 · Other+3 moreINTER-LAKES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $60,152 · Human ServicesINTER-LAKES COMMUNITY AC…Domestic Violence Network of the Lakes Region: $32,180 · Human ServicesDomestic Violence Networ…CHILDREN'S CARE CORNER: $17,450 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S CARE CORNEREAST DAKOTA TRANSIT INC: $59,567 · Public BenefitEAST DAKOTA T…VALIANT LIVING INCORPORATED: $58,870 · EmploymentVALIANT LIVIN…The Breadbasket: $5,600 · Food & Nutrition
Other$273,744Human Services$109,782Public Benefit$59,567Employment$58,870Food & Nutrition$5,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTER-LAKES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $60,152 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEAST DAKOTA TRANSIT INC: $59,567 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetVALIANT LIVING INCORPORATED: $58,870 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDomestic Violence Network of the Lakes Region: $32,180 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $24,276 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CARE CORNER: $17,450 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetWholeness Center: $13,725 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetThe Breadbasket: $5,600 over 1y, 6.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTER-LAKES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST DAKOTA TRANSIT INC ↗
  • Who funds VALIANT LIVING INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Domestic Violence Network of the Lakes Region ↗
  • Who funds THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CARE CORNER ↗
  • Who funds Wholeness Center ↗
  • Who funds The Breadbasket ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Interlakes Area United Way Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Interlakes Area United Way Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Interlakes Area United Way Corp?

    Find your warmest path to Interlakes Area United Way Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Interlakes Area United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home