Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

South Dakota · Public charity

Interlakes Area United Way Corp

Interlakes area united way coordinates financial and volunteer resources for non-profit agencies and programs in southeastern south dakota.

$112k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
8
Itemized grants FY2024
11
Organizations funded FY2023
27%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$102k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$9,200
Largest grant, FY2024
$42,697
Organizations funded a year
5 to 11
FY2019 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$145k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 27% of the organizations Interlakes Area United Way Corp funded were first-time grantees, receiving 17% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving8$102k25%
FY202311$115k27%
FY20229$109k22%
FY20215$47k20%
FY20206$60k0%
FY20198$74kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$252kPublic Benefit$60kHealth$59kYouth Development$52kArts & Culture$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kEducation$16kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Inter-Lakes Community Action Partnership Inc$60,15240%
East Dakota Transit Inc$59,56765%
Valiant Living Incorporated$58,87060%
Domestic Violence Network of the Lakes Region$32,18053%
The Dollywood Foundation$24,27620%
Children's Care Corner$17,45033%
Wholeness Center$13,72525%
The Breadbasket$5,60016%

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($236k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Interlakes Area United Way Corp supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInter-Lakes Community Action Partnership Inc: $60,152 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEast Dakota Transit Inc: $59,567 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetValiant Living Incorporated: $58,870 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDomestic Violence Network of the Lakes Region: $32,180 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetThe Dollywood Foundation: $24,276 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Care Corner: $17,450 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetWholeness Center: $13,725 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetThe Breadbasket: $5,600 over 1y, 6.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Interlakes Area United Way Corp with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Interlakes Area United Way Corp?

Find your warmest path to Interlakes Area United Way Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Interlakes Area United Way Corp

How much does Interlakes Area United Way Corp give?
Interlakes Area United Way Corp reported 8 itemized grants totaling $102,197, out of $112,197 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 11 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.
What does Interlakes Area United Way Corp fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Human Services (50%), Public Benefit (12%), Health (12%).
Who are Interlakes Area United Way Corp's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: Inter-Lakes Community Action Partnership Inc ($60k), East Dakota Transit Inc ($60k), Valiant Living Incorporated ($59k).
Does Interlakes Area United Way Corp fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 27% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Interlakes Area United Way Corp?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Interlakes Area United Way Corp based?
Interlakes Area United Way Corp is based in SD.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Interlakes Area United Way’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home