Skip to content
Interior Community Health Center at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

$376k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$296kHousing & Shelter$166kHealth$160kHuman Services$144kYouth Development$75kCrime & Legal$38k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $230k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $146k
$37,636
Median grant
1
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAIRBANKS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$75,000
CITY OF FAIRBANKS$70,645
BREAD LINE INC$48,022
NORTHERN HOPE CENTER$39,996
ALASKA LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION$37,636
FOUNDATION HEALTH PARTNERS$29,772
NWRAALASKA CENTER FOR RESOURCE FAMILIES$29,655
NORTH STAR COUNCIL ON AGING$28,160
RESOURCE CENTER FOR PARENTS & CHILDREN$16,993
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $247k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 24%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 24%NORTH STAR COUNCIL ON AGING: $75k → 21%RESOURCE CENTER FOR PARENTS & CHILDREN: $54k → 21%NWRAALASKA CENTER FOR RESOURCE FAMILIES: $43k → 21%NWRAALASKA CENTER FOR RESOURCE FAMILIES: $30k → 21%NORTH STAR COUNCIL ON AGING: $28k → 21%RESOURCE CENTER FOR PARENTS & CHILDREN: $17k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$552k · 6 repeat orgs$327k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$552k
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-10%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FAIRBANKS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK SERVICE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $145k · revenue +35%
  • FH
    FOUNDATION HEALTH LLC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $105k · revenue +12%
  • NS
    NORTH STAR COUNCIL ON AGING INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $103k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • FR
    FAIRBANKS RESCUE MISSION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $84k · revenue -10%
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -18%
  • NL
    NO LIMITS INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank of Alaska

FBA believes no one deserves to be hungry. We are dedicated to eliminating hunger in Alaska by obtaining and providing food to partner agencies and through anti-hunger leadership.

Food & Nutrition
2
South Peninsula Behavioral Health Services Inc

The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…

Health
3
Alaska Coalition on Housing and Homelessness

To increase affordable housing and end homelessness in Alaska.

Housing & Shelter
4
Alaska Farmers Market Association

to promote, support and advocate for Alaska agriculture

Education
5
Fairbanks Neighborhood Housing Services Inc

The mission of fairbanks neighborhood housing services is to improve the fairbanks north star borough and northern communities in alaska through education, financial assistance, and by partnering with like-minded organizations to mobilize…

Housing & Shelter
6
Flathead Food Bank Inc

The Flathead Food Bank strives to elimnate hunger in the Flathead Valley through collaborative partnerships creating effective solutions to connect and strengthen individuals, families and the community through access to healthy nutritious…

Food & Nutrition
7
Project Alaska Inc

Refugee professional integration and career advancement. Project Alaska commited to empowering our clients with the skills and resources required for career advancement and occupational prosperity,enabling them to lead their best lives.

Human Services
8
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
9
North Helpline

We believe that all deserve adequate food, housing and respect. We assist our neighbors in obtaining basic needs that affirm their human dignity and self worth.

—
10
Alaska Cabarethotel Restaurant & Retailers Association

Dedicated to advancing, serving, and protecting alaska's hospitality and foodservice industry.

—
11
Food Bank of Northwest Indiana Inc

To provide food to various charitable organizations and needy individuals in northwest indiana.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas

The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need in twelve counties in northeast arkansas by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fairbanks Community Food Bank Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is No Limits Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH STAR COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $103,160 · Human ServicesNORTH STAR COUNCIL ON AGING INCNORTHWEST RESOURCE ASSOCIATES: $72,890 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST RESOURCE ASSOCIATESRESOURCE CENTER FOR PARENTS AND CHILDREN INC: $70,993 · Human ServicesRESOURCE CENTER FOR PARENTS AND…FOUNDATION HEALTH LLC: $104,772 · HealthFOUNDATION HEALTH LL…NORTHERN HOPE CENTER: $54,996 · HealthNORTHERN HOPE CENTERFAIRBANKS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK SERVICE INC: $145,228 · Food & NutritionFAIRBANKS COMMUNIT…CITY OF FAIRBANKS: $70,645 · OtherCITY OF FAIRBAN…THE BREAD LINE INC: $48,022 · OtherTHE BREAD LINE …FAIRBANKS RESCUE MISSION INC: $84,404 · Housing & ShelterFAIRBANKS RE…NO LIMITS INCORPORATED: $11,326 · Housing & ShelterNO LIMITS IN…Boys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska: $74,529 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Gi…Alaska Legal Services Corporation: $37,636 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$247,043Health$159,768Food & Nutrition$145,228Other$118,667Housing & Shelter$95,730Youth Development$74,529Crime & Legal$37,636

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAIRBANKS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK SERVICE INC: $145,228 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFOUNDATION HEALTH LLC: $104,772 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH STAR COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $103,160 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetFAIRBANKS RESCUE MISSION INC: $84,404 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska: $74,529 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHWEST RESOURCE ASSOCIATES: $72,890 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetRESOURCE CENTER FOR PARENTS AND CHILDREN INC: $70,993 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetNORTHERN HOPE CENTER: $54,996 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetTHE BREAD LINE INC: $48,022 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetAlaska Legal Services Corporation: $37,636 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alaska Community …Rasmuson FoundationUnited Way of the Tan…The Usibelli Foundati…The Norman FoundationBill Stroecker Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Alaska Community FoundationAK23.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Rasmuson Foundation · United Way of the Tanana Valley Inc · The Usibelli Foundation · The Norman Foundation · Bill Stroecker Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Interior Community Health Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Interior Community Health Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Interior Community Health Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home