Skip to content
Int'L Assoc Bridge Structural & Ornamen Iron Workers Local Union 40 at a glance

· Public charity

Int'L Assoc Bridge Structural & Ornamen Iron Workers Local Union 40

The objectives of the union, as the representative of its members, are to improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and to establish necessary procedures for the amicable adjustment of all disputes which may arise between employers and employees.

$1.1M
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Employment$58kHealth$40kYouth Development$38kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kRecreation & Sports$25kArts & Culture$25kCommunity Improvement$19kHuman Services$15kOther$0
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $49,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,104,658 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,055,158 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$64M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNION HISTORIES$19,500
OUTREACH PROJECT$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$5,000
LAUGHTER SAVE LIVES FOUNDATION$5,000
ST MARTIN OF TOURS SCHOOL$5,000
NYC BLDG AND CONST INDUSTRY SAFETY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ALLAIRE COMMUNITY FARM: $10k → 6%ALLAIRE COMMUNITY FARM: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Int'L Assoc Bridge Structural & Ornamen Iron Workers Local Union 40’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 68% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 52%.

Int'L Assoc Bridge Structural & Ornamen Iron Workers Local Union 40lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159k · 7 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$159k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+35%

Still filing today

43%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthPublic BenefitPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OP
    OUTREACH PROJECT INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $19k · revenue +23%
  • NH
    NY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $18k · revenue +17%
  • AC
    ALLAIRE COMMUNITY FARM A NJ NONPROFIT CO
    2× · 2019–2022 · $15k · revenue +291%

Funded once

  • IW
    IRON WORKERS DISASTER RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • ST
    SUB-CONTRACTORS TRADE ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +35%
  • H9
    HEART 911 BCTD GREATER NY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Upstate New York Construction Industry Research & Service Tr Fund

To assist workers and employers in solving problems of mutual concern not susceptible to resolution within the collective bargaining process, to improve the employment opportunities for employees, to expand the market for the construction…

Employment
2
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
3
Foundation for Research of the New York Academy of Osteopathy Inc
—
4
Honor Emergency Fund of the Fire Department of the City of New York

To provide health, medical, counseling services and financial aid to active and retired fdny firefighters, fire officers, their families, active members of the emergency medical service and active civilian fdny employees in medical and…

Membership Benefit
5
North Shore-Lij Occupational Medicine Pc

North shore-lij occupational medicine, pc is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the…

Health
6
New York Dental Affiliates Pc

Operating as an integral part of the nyc health + hospitals ("h+h"), formerly the new york city health and hospitals corporation. nyda will further h+h's tax-exempt charitable, scientific, and educational purposes by enhancing the…

Health
7
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
8
New York State Building & Construction Trades Council Afl-Cio

Liason for organized labor.

—
9
Altruism for New York Foundationinc
Civil Rights
10
Cop Shot Inc

The purpose of cop shot is to offer a standing reward of $10,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of anyone shooting a new york city police officer.to determine that an individual of organization qualifies to receive…

—
11
Gotham Health Fqhc Inc

Gotham health fqhc, inc., operating together with new york city health and hospitals corporation under a public entity model federally qualified health center, provides you and your family with access to primary and preventative healthcare…

Health
12
Lenox Hill Hospital Medical Pc

Lenox hill hospital medical, pc is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nch Healthcare System Inc; the most unlike its peers is National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUTREACH PROJECT: $46,000 · OtherOUTREACH PROJECTBUILD UP NYC LLC: $40,000 · OtherBUILD UP NYC LLCIRON WORKERS DISASTER RELIEF FUND: $25,000 · OtherIRON WORKERS DISASTER RELIEF FUNDUNION HISTORIES: $19,500 · OtherUNION HISTORIESNYC HELMETS TO HARDHATS AWARD: $12,000 · OtherNYC HELMETS TO HARDHATS AWARDSUB-CONTRACTORS TRADE ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · OtherNYC BLDG AND CONST INDUSTRY SAFETY: $10,000 · OtherHEART 911 BCTD GREATER NY: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · Other+2 more: $10,250 · Other+2 moreOUTREACH PROJECT INC: $18,500 · HealthOUTREACH PROJ…NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $10,000 · HealthNCH HEALTHCAR…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $5,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONA…NY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC: $17,500 · Public BenefitNY HELMET…THOMAS JOSEPH FRANZESE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Public BenefitTHOMAS JO…ALLAIRE COMMUNITY FARM A NJ NONPROFIT CO: $15,000 · Human ServicesLAUGHTER SAVES LIVES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHAUDENOSAUNEE NATIONALS DEVELO GROUP INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONAL SEPTEMBER 11 MEMORIAL AND MUSEUM AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$190,250Health$33,500Public Benefit$23,500Human Services$15,000Philanthropy$5,000Youth Development$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUILD UP NYC LLC: $40,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetIRON WORKERS DISASTER RELIEF FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetOUTREACH PROJECT INC: $18,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetALLAIRE COMMUNITY FARM A NJ NONPROFIT CO: $15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSUB-CONTRACTORS TRADE ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHOMAS JOSEPH FRANZESE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetLAUGHTER SAVES LIVES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAUDENOSAUNEE NATIONALS DEVELO GROUP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNATIONAL SEPTEMBER 11 MEMORIAL AND MUSEUM AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO3.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Int'L Assoc Bridge Structural & Ornamen Iron Workers Local Union 40 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Int'L Assoc Bridge Structural & Ornamen Iron Workers Local Union 40. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.0M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Int'L Assoc Bridge Structural & Ornamen Iron Workers Local Union 40’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home