· Public charity
Institute for Women's Policy Research
Iwpr champions economic equity for all women and eliminates barriers to their full participation in society.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $125k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $738k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YELLOWHAMMER FUND | $125,000 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO | $87,500 |
| HEALTHY FUTURES OF TEXAS | $75,000 |
| DALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC | $75,000 |
| IPAS - AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION | $75,000 |
| BELLEVUE COLLEGE | $75,000 |
| FAMILY HEALTH CENTER | $75,000 |
| HOWARD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $50,000 |
| FREDERICK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| OHLONE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT | $50,000 |
| TRUMAN COLLEGE | $40,000 |
| TAKE CONTROL INITIATIVE | $35,000 |
| SOLANO COMMUNITY COLLEGE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CLUB | $25,000 |
| ADVOCATES FOR REPRODUCTIVE EDUCATION | $25,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone
Health Access Fund works to protect the fundamental right of all people to choose and access quality,dignified and affordable reproductive health care.
The purpose of the family planning council of iowa is to assure access to quality reproductive healthcare and family planning for all people.
Texans for vaccine choice exists to directly influence vaccine choice public policy and legislation
We provide financial assistance and emotional support while building community spaces for people who need abortions in texas unapologetically, with compassion and conviction. through organizing and movement-building, we foster a positive…
The texas academy of family physicians is dedicated to the promotion of a health care environment that values the vital role of family physicians in providing quality, comprehensive care to all texans.
Our vision is a nation where the best health and health care are equally accessible and affordable to all.
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…
Offer life-affirming choices for pregnancy and sexual health.
The human rights campaign foundation is organized for the charitable and educational purposes of promoting public education and welfare for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (lgbtq+) community. the hrc foundation envisions…
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
Provide funding and logistical support to ensure southerners receive safe and compassionate reproductive care including abortion services. through education and leadership development we build power in communities of color to abolish…
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Institute for Women's Policy Research funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Institute for Women's Policy Research. Bigger dots raise more.
- Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Institute for Women's Policy Research’s filings →