Skip to content

· Public charity

Institute for Justice

Through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research, the INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE (ij) advances a rule of law under which individuals can control their destinies as free and responsible members of society.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.4MCivil Rights$137kPublic Benefit$127kRecreation & Sports$84kHealth$8k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $77,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $103,566 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,066 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $64k
$14,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$178M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
State Policy Network$20,000
American legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)$20,000
InHeirit$14,000
7323 Chicago Caf$10,000
National Conference of State legislature$7,500
Daniel's Test Kitchen$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TEMPLETON ACADEMY: $1k → 10%PREPARATORY SCHOOL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSON FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%National Conference of State legislature: $8k → 12%EDCHOICE INC: $1.3M → 16%MOOR'S BREWING COMPANY LLC: $10k → 14%STATE POLICY NETWORK: $20k → 7%CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $7k → 14%Daniel's Test Kitchen: $6k → 14%STATE POLICY NETWORK: $20k → 7%THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY: $10k → 14%THE RECORD TRACK: $8k → 14%STATE POLICY NETWORK: $20k → 7%SERVING OUR CHILDREN INC: $33k → 14%SISTA AFYA COMMUNITY MENTAL WELLNESS: $8k → 14%State Policy Network: $20k → 7%THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY: $7k → 14%7323 Chicago Caf: $10k → 14%STATE POLICY NETWORK: $20k → 7%DUPONT PARK ADVENTIST SCHOOL: $7k → 14%R CITY KITCHEN GROUP: $13k → 14%STATE POLICY NETWORK: $20k → 7%JUSTUS JUNKIE INC: $9k → 14%AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL (ALEC): $34k → 7%PIGGYBACK NETWORK: $7k → 14%AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL (ALEC): $22k → 7%NEW MAGNOLIA GARDEN CENTER INC: $7k → 14%American legislative Exchange Council (ALEC): $20k → 7%InHeirit: $14k → 14%AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL (ALEC): $17k → 7%TBM GROUP: $11k → 14%AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL (ALEC): $17k → 7%AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL (ALEC): $17k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

15%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$264k · 3 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
15

Total granted

$264k
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
-12%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $127k · revenue +37%
  • SP
    STATE POLICY NETWORK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +26%
  • TF
    THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $17k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • EI
    EdChoice Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $1.3M · revenue 0%
  • SO
    SERVING OUR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2020 · $33k · revenue -16%
  • RC
    R CITY KITCHEN GROUP
    one grant, 2024 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Seed Public Charter School of Washington Dc

The seed public charter school of washington, dc is a public college-preparatory boarding school whose primary mission is to provide an outstanding intensive educational program that prepares children, both academically and socially, for…

Education
2
Education Commission of the States

The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…

Education
3
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Center City Public Charter Schools

Center city public charter schools (center city pcs) empowers our students for lifelong success by building strong character, promoting academic excellence, and generating public service throughout washington, d.c.

Education
6
Washington Federation of Independent Schools

Strengthening education as the advocate and voice of private schools.

—
7
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
8
Cesar Chavez Public Charter School for Public Policy

To prepare students to succeed in competitive colleges and to empower them to use public policy to create a more just, free, and equal world.

Education
9
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
10
Council of Chief State School Officers

Ccsso through leadership, advocacy and service, assists chief state school officers and their organizations in achieving the vision of an american education system that enables all children to succeed in school, work, and life.

Education
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
Brooklyn Law School

To provide students with the knowledge, skills, ethical values needed for a career in law.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies; the most unlike its peers is Preparatory School of the District of Columbia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EdChoice Inc: $1,283,542 · EducationEdChoice Inc+4 more: $51,381 · EducationTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES: $16,500 · OtherInHeirit: $14,000 · OtherR CITY KITCHEN GROUP: $13,000 · OtherTBM GROUP: $11,000 · Other7323 Chicago Caf: $10,000 · OtherMOOR'S BREWING COMPANY LLC: $10,000 · OtherJUSTUS JUNKIE INC: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherSISTA AFYA COMMUNITY MENTAL WELLNESS: $8,000 · OtherNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES: $7,500 · OtherDUPONT PARK ADVENTIST SCHOOL: $7,480 · OtherPIGGYBACK NETWORK: $7,000 · OtherNEW MAGNOLIA GARDEN CENTER INC: $7,000 · OtherDaniel's Test Kitchen: $6,000 · Other+1 more: $1,219 · OtherAMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL: $127,000 · Public BenefitSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $120,000 · Civil Rights
Education$1,334,923Other$135,699Public Benefit$127,000Civil Rights$120,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEdChoice Inc: $1,283,542 over 1y, 11% of budgetAMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL: $127,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES: $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $6,793 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INC: $1,959 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EdChoice Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SERVING OUR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
  • Who funds PREPARATORY SCHOOL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA6.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Institute for Justice funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Institute for Justice. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Institute for Justice’s filings →

    More from the funding graph