Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement

To provide training and leadership development opportunities for asian american native hawaiian pacific islander (aanhpi) workers; to support research of and for aanhpi workers; and to pursue social and economic justice forall workers.

$113k
Granted FY2022
5
Itemized grants FY2022
5
Organizations funded FY2022
20%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2022
$90k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2022
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$24,192
Organizations funded a year
3 to 9
FY2018 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
5
Total assets, FY2022
$2.1M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 20% of the organizations Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement funded were first-time grantees, receiving 12% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
Public BenefitCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20225$90k20%
FY20213$82k33%
FY20206$255k50%
FY20199$312k33%
FY20189$422kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Public Benefit$976kYouth Development$141kCivil Rights$17kHuman Services$15kHousing & Shelter$11k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MI
MA
NV
PA
NJ
CA
DC
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Apala-Nv$290,0002n/a
Service Employees International Union$170,00010%
Asian Americans United Inc$141,330516%
Penn Immigration & Citizenship Coalition$96,2862n/a
Access Philanthropy Charities$65,00029%
Progress Michigan Education Inc$64,98433%
American Fed of Labor & Congress of Ind TX Gulf Coast Area Labor Feder$51,94624%
Pilipino Workers Center of Southern$49,20021%
Urban Affairs Coalition$44,00020%
Chinese Progressive Association$42,00022%
Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Apala-Nv$290,0002n/a
Service Employees International Union$170,00010%
Asian Americans United Inc$141,330516%
Penn Immigration & Citizenship Coalition$96,2862n/a
Access Philanthropy Charities$65,00029%
Progress Michigan Education Inc$64,98433%
American Fed of Labor & Congress of Ind TX Gulf Coast Area Labor Feder$51,94624%
Pilipino Workers Center of Southern$49,20021%
Urban Affairs Coalition$44,00020%
Chinese Progressive Association$42,00022%
Asian & Pacific Islander American Vote$30,00011%
Texas Afl-Cio$24,60011%
Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement$24,50022%
Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance Afl-Cio$24,2002n/a
Aaop$17,0001n/a
Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance Afl-Cio$14,7001n/a
Reformed Church Of Highland Park - Affordable Housing Corp$11,15310%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetService Employees International Union: $170,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAsian Americans United Inc: $141,330 over 5y, 16% of budgetAccess Philanthropy Charities: $65,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetProgress Michigan Education Inc: $64,984 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetAmerican Fed of Labor & Congress of Ind TX Gulf Coast Area Labor Feder: $51,946 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetPilipino Workers Center of Southern: $49,200 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUrban Affairs Coalition: $44,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChinese Progressive Association: $42,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetAsian & Pacific Islander American Vote: $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTexas Afl-Cio: $24,600 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetInstitute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement: $24,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetReformed Church Of Highland Park - Affordable Housing Corp: $11,153 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NEO Philanthropy IncNY17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Wallace H Coulter Trust · Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · Asian & Pacific Islander American Vote · Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc · Gofundmeorg · Impactassetsinc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement with peer funders

About Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement

How much does Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement give?
Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement reported 5 itemized grants totaling $90,345, out of $112,931 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 9 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2022.
What does Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2022, its largest causes are Public Benefit (84%), Youth Development (12%), Civil Rights (1%).
Who are Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2022: Apala-Nv ($290k), Service Employees International Union ($170k), Asian Americans United Inc ($141k).
Does Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include NEO Philanthropy Inc, Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc, Wallace H Coulter Trust.
Where is Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement based?
Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $2k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Institute for Asian Pacific American Leadership and Advancement’s filings →

More from the funding graph