Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Inspired Nation Inc

Grants to qualifying non-profits to benefit youth

$20k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Health$101kArts & Culture$69kHuman Services$30kYouth Development$15kHousing & Shelter$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$52k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Berklee College of Music$10,000
Genesis at the Crossroads$5,000
Mana Mentors$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Edward Charles Foundation: $5k → 14%SUNRISE DAY CAMP: $10k → 6%ZEBRA CROSSINGS: $9k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
HI

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$122k · 5 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$122k
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+90%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    Westchester Medical Center Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · $31k · revenue +40%
  • OP
    OGUNQUIT PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $28k · revenue +50%
  • CC
    CONNORS CLIMB FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $24k · revenue +277%

Funded once

  • KI
    KIDS IN CRISIS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +76%
  • AT
    ARTWORKS THE NAOMI COHAIN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -93%
  • ART START INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +92%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
The New York Gracie Square Hospital Inc

Our mission is to provide the highest-quality, state-of-the-art mental health and chemical dependency treatment in a warm, healing environment. our caring, compassionate team prepares our patients to return to their families and…

Health
3
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

5
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
6
Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute

The Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute ALCMI is dedicated to catalyzing and accelerating the discovery, development and delivery of new and more effective treatment options for lung cancer patients.

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
12
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in Crisis Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mana Mentor Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Westchester Medical Center Foundation — $30,518 · HealthWestchester Medical Center FoundationCONNORS CLIMB FOUNDATION — $23,875 · HealthCONNORS CLIMB FOUNDATIONYork Hospital — $23,375 · HealthYork HospitalDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $9,169 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncNAMI National — $5,001 · HealthNAMI NationalOGUNQUIT PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION — $28,375 · Arts & CultureOGUNQUIT PLAYHOUSE FOUNDA…ARTWORKS THE NAOMI COHAIN FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureARTWORKS THE NAOMI COHAIN…ART START INC — $10,319 · Arts & CultureART START INCY2Y NETWORK INC — $15,397 · Youth DevelopmentY2Y NETWORK …KIDS HELPING KIDS INC — $10,319 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS HELPING…SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $10,319 · Human ServicesSUNRISE DAY…ZEBRA CROSSINGS — $9,169 · Human ServicesZEBRA CROSS…EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Human ServicesEDWARD CHAR…KIDS IN CRISIS INC — $15,000 · OtherKIDS IN CRIS…MANA MENTOR INC — $5,000 · OtherMANA MENTOR …GENESIS AT THE CROSSROADS INC — $5,000 · OtherGENESIS AT T…BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC — $10,000 · EducationSONA SONGWRITERS OF NORTH AMERICA — $5,000 · Community Improvement
Health$91,938Arts & Culture$53,694Youth Development$25,716Human Services$24,488Other$25,000Education$10,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWestchester Medical Center Foundation — $30,518 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOGUNQUIT PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION — $28,375 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCONNORS CLIMB FOUNDATION — $23,875 over 2y, 10% of budgetYork Hospital — $23,375 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetY2Y NETWORK INC — $15,397 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARTWORKS THE NAOMI COHAIN FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetART START INC — $10,319 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKIDS HELPING KIDS INC — $10,319 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $10,319 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZEBRA CROSSINGS — $9,169 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $9,169 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National — $5,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONA SONGWRITERS OF NORTH AMERICA — $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANA MENTOR INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGENESIS AT THE CROSSROADS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Inspired Nation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Kids in Crisis Inc49% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Inspired Nation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Inspired Nation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $14k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph