Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Innovative Quality Schools

Please see the mission and vision of INNOVATIVE QUALITY SCHOOLS (iqs) as previously stated.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$130k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $5,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $15,250 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$5,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$436k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BDOTE LEARNING CENTER$5,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Minnesota Excellence in Learning Academy: $24k → 11%Level Up Academy: $10k → 14%Minnesota Excellence in Learning Academy: $10k → 11%The Journey School: $10k → 14%Minnesota Excellence in Learning Academy: $10k → 11%St Paul City School: $7k → 14%Progeny Academy: $9k → 11%Notre Ecole: $5k → 11%Bdote Learning Center: $13k → 11%Bdote Learning Center: $7k → 11%BDOTE LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 11%Nasha Shkola: $5k → 11%BlueSky Charter School: $6k → 11%Success Academy: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Math & Science Academy

We provide accelerated curricula in all subjects with an emphasis on math and science.

Education
2
Minnesota Transitions Charter School

We are a student-centered learning community that inspires and supports all learners to achieve excellence through equitable, relevant learning experiences.

Education
3
Phoenix Academy

The phoenix academy of art and science school program has been developed on research- backed foundational teaching and learning practices and with the intent of offering a curriculum that is more experiential and personally appealing to…

Education
4
Stonebridge World School

Our mission is to create and environment with a global perspective that prepares students to excel academically. Our vision is to develop motivated and principled global citizens for lifelong learning and productive citizenship.

Education
5
Aspen Academy

To provide students with a well-rounded and core knowledge-based education.

Education
6
The World Learner School of Chaska

The World Learner School's mission is to create a school that supports an experiential collaborative learning (Montessori) program that empowers children to unfold their full potential as whole and unique persons in classroom, local and…

Housing & Shelter
7
New Millennium Academy

The new millennium academy (nma) community prepares learners for life, engages them in high academic achievement, and fosters hmong cultural pride and identity.

Education
8
Woodbury Leadership Academy

The mission of wla is to utilize leadership based programs and strategies grounded in solid research, combined with the demonstrated success of core knowledge curriculum as the basis of a rigorous overall educational program that builds…

Education
9
Yinghua Academy

The mission of yinghua academy is to provide a challenging and comprehensive learning environment that will nurture the students' natural inquisitiveness and will prepare them to be engaged and productive global citizens.

Education
10
Arcadia Charter School

It is the mission of arcadia charter school to prepare our students to transition intellectually, emotionally, and ethically to higher education, future employment, and engaged citizenship.

Education
11
Rivers Edge Academy

The mission of rivers edge academy is, in partnership with parents and community, to prepare urban high school students for their further education and career with rigorous academics, innovative projects and an interdisciplinary…

12
Nova Classical Academy

Offering a rigorous, through, systematic, and challenging classical education to K-12 students.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota Excellence in Learning Academy and the most unlike its peers is Progeny Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MINNESOTA EXCELLENCE IN LEARNING ACADEMY — $43,653 · EducationMINNESOTA EXCELLENCE IN LEARNING ACADEMYBDOTE LEARNING CENTER — $25,249 · EducationBDOTE LEARNING CENTERTHE JOURNEY SCHOOLS INC — $10,000 · EducationTHE JOURNEY SCHOOLS INCSUCCESS ACADEMY — $10,000 · EducationSUCCESS ACADEMYLEVEL UP ACADEMY — $10,000 · EducationLEVEL UP ACADEMYPROGENY ACADEMY INC — $8,542 · EducationPROGENY ACADEMY INCST PAUL CITY SCHOOL — $6,729 · EducationST PAUL CITY SCHOOLBLUESKY CHARTER SCHOOL — $5,500 · EducationNasha Shkola — $5,413 · EducationNotre Ecole French Immersion School — $5,100 · Other
Education$125,086Other$5,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMINNESOTA EXCELLENCE IN LEARNING ACADEMY — $43,653 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBDOTE LEARNING CENTER — $25,249 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE JOURNEY SCHOOLS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSUCCESS ACADEMY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLEVEL UP ACADEMY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROGENY ACADEMY INC — $8,542 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetST PAUL CITY SCHOOL — $6,729 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUESKY CHARTER SCHOOL — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNasha Shkola — $5,413 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNotre Ecole French Immersion School — $5,100 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Innovative Quality Schools funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Innovative Quality Schools?

    Find your warmest path to Innovative Quality Schools through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph