Skip to content

· Private foundation

Inman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$141k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$349kYouth Development$130kArts & Culture$77kHealth$59kPublic Benefit$58kFood & Nutrition$53kScience & Tech$47kHousing & Shelter$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$63,500
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$10,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$7,500
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$5,000
CENTRAL TEXAS PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION$5,000
KEY TO CHANGE$5,000
ZACH THEATRE CAPITAL CAMPAIGN$5,000
CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION$5,000
HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN$3,500
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS$3,500
CARITAS OF AUSTIN$3,500
SAMARITAN CENTER$3,000
HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY$2,500
LIFESPACE FOUNDATION$2,500
TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $1k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $4k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $3k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $3k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $3k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $3k → 10%SAMARITAN CENTER: $115 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
VA
MD
KS
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$794k · 36 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
23

Total granted

$794k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+3%

Still filing today

75%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KT
    KEY TO CHANGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +761%
  • TEXAS TRIBUNE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $32k · revenue +50%
  • CF
    Center for Excellence in Education
    6× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • AC
    Austin Child Guidance Center
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +4%
  • TR
    THE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +31%
  • CO
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
4
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education
5
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
6
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
7
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
8
Forty First Foundation

The forty first foundation supports and advances the university of texas at austin in its pursuit of excellence. we work closely with the office of the president to identify, fund, and implement strategic initiatives that enhance the…

Education
9
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humanities Texas; the most unlike its peers is Naval Intelligence Professionals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/51
Grantees still filing
30/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $257,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINLBJ FOUNDATION: $88,500 · OtherLBJ FOUNDATIONZACH THEATRE CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $30,000 · OtherCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $19,370 · Other+37 more: $179,000 · Other+37 moreCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $37,500 · EducationCALIFORNIA IN…TEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $32,450 · EducationTEXAS TRIBUNE…TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationTYLER JUNIOR …SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $6,500 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN …Claremont Graduate University: $6,000 · EducationClaremont Gra…SAINT JAMES SCHOOL: $5,500 · EducationTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $5,000 · Education+3 more: $3,000 · EducationKEY TO CHANGE: $35,000 · Arts & CultureNAVAL AVIATION MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureNAISMITH MEMORIAL BASKETBALL HALL OF FAME: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $5,200 · Arts & CultureCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $52,500 · Food & NutritionSAMARITAN CENTER INC: $14,440 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE AUSTIN: $1,000 · Human ServicesCenter for Excellence in Education: $22,500 · Science & TechCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 · Health
Other$573,870Education$105,950Arts & Culture$60,700Food & Nutrition$52,500Human Services$26,440Science & Tech$22,500Health$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $52,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $37,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEY TO CHANGE: $35,000 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetTEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $32,450 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Excellence in Education: $22,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $19,370 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST PARTNERSHIP: $16,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetSAMARITAN CENTER INC: $14,440 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPUBLIC AGENDA INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNAVAL AVIATION MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $11,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAustin Child Guidance Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION: $10,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetTYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClaremont Graduate University: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JAMES SCHOOL: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAISMITH MEMORIAL BASKETBALL HALL OF FAME: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNaval Intelligence Professionals: $3,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Eisenhower Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUND OFF: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS STATE HISTORY MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARMSTRONG COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES NAVAL INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCouncil on At Risk Youth: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGERALD R FORD PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE AUSTIN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCreative Action: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas 2036: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANITIES TEXAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Himalayan Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Lyndon B Johnson National Historical Park: $1,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds KEY TO CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TRIBUNE INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Excellence in Education ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC AGENDA INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVAL AVIATION MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Austin Child Guidance Center ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds Claremont Graduate University ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JAMES SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds NAISMITH MEMORIAL BASKETBALL HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds Naval Intelligence Professionals ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TADSAW INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX20.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Buena Vista Foundation · Still Water Foundation · Bernard & Audre Rapoport Foundation · Ascension Seton · Better Business Bureau · Greater Houston Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Ibm International Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Inman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Inman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Naval Aviation Museum Foundation Inc: 13% of income from government
  • United States Naval Institute: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Inman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Inman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Inman’s filings →

More from the funding graph