· Private foundation
Infinity Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GURUJI SANGAT FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $14,100 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,765 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,367 |
| FREE HEARTS FREE MINDS | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,314 |
| TIBET HOUSE US INC | $4,000 |
| GIULIANO DIAS DE MORAIS | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,100 |
| ARSHA VIDYA GURUKULAM | $1,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS | $500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 48% of grant dollars ($189k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 52% that went abroad ($202k) is mapped below.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Beyond the US: 52% of all-years giving ($202k)
5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.
14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2021–2024 · $62k
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2021–2024 · $34k
- IGIndividual grant recipient6× · 2019–2024 · $33k
Funded once
- IFInstitute for Civilizational Studiesone grant, 2019 · $23k · revenue -20%
- CPCALIFORNIA PARENTS FOR EQUALIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIALSone grant, 2019 · $15k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The very essence of spirituality and religion lies in understanding the depth of ancient wisdom, connecting to the divine, and achieving inner peace. our organization, rooted in the profound teachings of vedic scriptures and the practice…
Religious culture and education, meditation and religions comparative study
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Infinity Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Infinity Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Infinity’s filings →