Skip to content

· Private foundation

Indo- American Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$177k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$137k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$492kInternational$103kScience & Tech$17kAnimals$10kArts & Culture$6kCivil Rights$5kHealth$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $137k
$136,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 98% of reported assets are held in Charles Schawab.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$136,500
TAMIL NADU FOUNDATION USA$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 22% of grant dollars ($139k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 78% that went abroad ($499k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%SRI AHOBILI MUTT INC: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
NJ
CA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 78% of all-years giving ($499k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$480k · 14 grants
Sri Lanka$19k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Indo- American Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Indo- American Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 79% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$431k · 9 repeat orgs$208k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
18

Total granted

$431k
$208k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+46%

Still filing today

33%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    8× · 2017–2025 · $308k
  • TN
    TAMIL NADU FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue -37%
  • BF
    BHUVANA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $7k

Funded once

  • AT
    ABBOY TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $130k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $26k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Prakasam Global Nri Forum

Help poor students in education.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Nunmaan Tamil Academy

To promote and preserve the Tamil language and culture through educational programs and community-based instruction.

Education
3
Sampradaya Usa

Foster teachings of hindu religion

Religion
4
Shraman Foundation
Arts & Culture
5
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Karuna America

fund and support rural health and education programs

International
7
Samarpan Foundation Usa
—
8
Ananta Giving Foundation

To provide support for charitable and educational organizations and initiatives in the united states and abroad, including but not limited to organizations and initiatives focused on providing and facilitating access to high quality…

Philanthropy
9
One Billion Literates Foundation Usa

Improve the social and economic conditions of the economically weaker and underprivileged sections of society in India; and improve the literacy rate in villages in India by imparting elementary education to children in these villages

Education
10
San Diego Tamil Palli

Tamil Academy

Education
11
Armman-Usa

ARMMAN USA aims to support ARMMAN India directed towards reducing maternal, child, and neonatal mortality in India by providing financial support, technical support, and internships for professionals in India, forming volunteer groups, and…

International
12
Sri Rama Foundation Inc

Sri Rama Foundation was created to provide a loving home for orphaned and destitute children in India. In 1976 Sri Rama Foundation began funding Anath Shishu Palan Trust of India. Today Sri Ram Ashram is situated on 16 acres of land in the…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tamil Nadu Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is San Marino Schools Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $308,003 · OtherIndividual grant recipientABBOY TRUST: $130,000 · OtherABBOY TRUSTIndividual grant recipient: $25,600 · Other+16 more: $58,866 · Other+16 moreTAMIL NADU FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyTAMIL NADU FOUNDA…+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropySan Marino Schools Foundation: $8,500 · EducationBhuvana Foundation Tennessee: $3,000 · EducationKHAN ACADEMY INC: $1,500 · EducationSankara Nethralaya OM Trust Inc: $1,000 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesSRI AHOBILA MUTH INC: $500 · Human Services
Other$522,469Philanthropy$100,500Education$14,000Human Services$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTAMIL NADU FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetSan Marino Schools Foundation: $8,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSankara Nethralaya OM Trust Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSRI AHOBILA MUTH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TAMIL NADU FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds San Marino Schools Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Bhuvana Foundation Tennessee ↗
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Sankara Nethralaya OM Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds SRI AHOBILA MUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Indo- American Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Indo- American Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Indo- American’s filings →

    More from the funding graph