Skip to content

· Private foundation

Individual Freedom Fund

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$209k
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$118kEducation$35kCivil Rights$35kInternational$31kPublic Benefit$18kHealth$11kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k7 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $170k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$33,500
ANSWERS IN GENESIS$33,500
RAFIKI FOUNDATION$31,000
THE HAVEN AT HEBRON$30,000
BLACKABY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$21,500
THE OBRIA GROUP INC$10,500
GEORGIA RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION TRUST FUND$10,000
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION$9,209
CRU$8,000
THE AREOPAQUS$6,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$5,000
STAND TO REASON$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
THE NAVIGATORS$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE OBRIA GROUP INC: $11k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
CA
CO
KY
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$150k · 10 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$150k
$900

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
ReligionPublic BenefitInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ANSWERS IN GENESIS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $40k · revenue +100%
  • GR
    GEORGIA RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION TRUST FUND
    7× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +68%
  • BM
    BLACKABY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
    7× · 2017–2023 · $29k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CB
    CENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $900
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
2
Christian Research Institute Inc

The mission statement of the Christian Research Institute is to provide Christians worldwide with carefully researched information and well-reasoned answers that encourage them in their faith and equip them to intelligently represent it to…

Religion
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Bible Thinker Inc

Bible Thinker, Inc is a ministry dedicated to equipping people to think and live biblically. There are three main areas of teaching that we focus on:1. Teaching accurate theology based on exegeting the text of the Bible and confronting…

Religion
5
Liberty Initiative

Biblical worldview advancement

Religion
6
Alpha and Omega Ministries Inc

Alpha and Omega Ministries seeks to provide a faithful and accurate response to the many challenges presented to the Christian Church in the modern world. Based firmly upon an unflinching commitment to the Bible as the Word of God and to…

Religion
7
The Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies

The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…

Religion
8
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

—
9
American Atheists Inc

The organization works for the civil liberties of atheists and the total, absolute separation of government and religion.

Religion
10
Ankerberg Theological Research Institute

The mission of the ankerberg theological research institute is to reach viewers and listeners for the gospel of christ through radio tv, and internet evangelism via the john ankerberg show.

Arts & Culture
11
International Orality Institute

The purpose of this corporation is international biblical education and the activities that make that goal possible. we seek to come alongside church bodies who desire to study god's work and assist them to teach their leaders a solid,…

Religion
12
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGIA RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION TRUST FUND: $34,749 · OtherGEORGIA RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION TRUS…THE HAVEN AT HEBRON INC: $30,000 · OtherTHE HAVEN AT HEBRON INCCRU: $10,700 · OtherCRUIndividual grant recipient: $4,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE NAVIGATORS: $3,000 · Other+2 more: $2,580 · OtherANSWERS IN GENESIS INC: $39,500 · ReligionANSWERS IN GENESIS INCBLACKABY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $29,150 · ReligionBLACKABY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONALTHE AREOPAGUS INC: $12,400 · ReligionTHE AREOPAGUS INCSTAND TO REASON: $4,250 · ReligionHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $35,400 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLE…RAFIKI FOUNDATION INC: $31,000 · InternationalRAFIKI FOUNDA…THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $12,909 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $5,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $500 · Public BenefitTHE OBRIA GROUP INC: $10,500 · Human Services
Other$85,629Religion$85,300Education$35,400International$31,000Public Benefit$18,409Human Services$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANSWERS IN GENESIS INC: $39,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $35,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION TRUST FUND: $34,749 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetRAFIKI FOUNDATION INC: $31,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLACKABY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $29,150 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $12,909 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AREOPAGUS INC: $12,400 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetTHE OBRIA GROUP INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND TO REASON: $4,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANSWERS IN GENESIS INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION TRUST FUND ↗
  • Who funds RAFIKI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACKABY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AREOPAGUS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OBRIA GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds STAND TO REASON ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Individual Freedom Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Individual Freedom Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Individual Freedom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph