Skip to content
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

$780k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$385k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.3MHousing & Shelter$1.1MCommunity Improvement$604kPhilanthropy$190kEducation$153kArts & Culture$6kReligion$6kYouth Development$5k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $370k
  • $250k+1 grant · $385k
$95,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$842M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STABILITY FIRST INC$384,756
NEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER$146,674
CENTERSTONE IN$127,939
LAWRENCE COUNTY ECONOMIC GROWTH COUNCIL$95,500
The Greater Bloomington Chamber of Commerce Inc$6,930
EMINENCE CHRISTIAN CHURCH$5,990
Tandem Community Birth Center and Postpartum House Inc$5,060
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CENTERSTONE IN: $128k → 14%Morgan County Economic Development: $5k → 9%Lawrence county economic growth council: $296k → 12%SICHC: $460k → 15%Indiana State Medical Association: $5k → 16%Bloomington Health Foundation Inc: $472k → 18%EMINENCE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $6k → 13%Lawrence county economic growth council: $172k → 12%Cancer Support Community: $5k → 16%bloomington health foundation: $29k → 18%LAWRENCE COUNTY ECONOMIC GROWTH COUNCIL: $96k → 12%IVY TECH FOUNDATION: $153k → 16%The Greater Bloomington Chamber of Commerce Inc: $7k → 18%LAWRENCE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $85k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMINGTON: $5k → 18%Tandem Community Birth Center and Postpartum House Inc: $5k → 18%CENTERSTONE: $630k → 18%CENTERSTONE: $630k → 18%NEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER: $147k → 18%UNITED WAY OF MONROE COUNTY: $105k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 4 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$3.6M
$744k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-1%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $491k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BLOOMINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.5M · revenue -58% · 35% of their budget
  • CO
    CENTERSTONE OF INDIANA INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +24%
  • NH
    NEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $700k · revenue -26%

Funded once

  • SI
    SOUTHERN INDIANA COMMUNITY HEALTH CAREgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $460k · revenue +37%
  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $153k · revenue -2%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA
    one grant, 2021 · $105k · revenue -51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
2
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
6
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
8
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Indiana University Health Blackford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern Indiana Community Health Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Stability First Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
6/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLOOMINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,456,411 · PhilanthropyBLOOMINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION INCCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $552,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP INCUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $105,000 · PhilanthropyCENTERSTONE OF INDIANA INC: $1,387,939 · HealthCENTERSTONE OF INDIANA INCSOUTHERN INDIANA COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE: $459,539 · HealthSOUTHERN INDIANA COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE+2 more: $10,106 · HealthNEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER INC: $700,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTE…STABILITY FIRST INC: $384,756 · Housing & ShelterSTABILITY FIRST INCIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $152,975 · EducationIndiana University Foundation: $6,000 · EducationLAWRENCE COUNTY ECONOMIC GROWTH COUNCIL INC: $95,500 · Community ImprovementGREATER BLOOMINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $35,550 · OtherEMINENCE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $5,990 · OtherMORGAN COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $5,000 · OtherINDIANA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMINGTON INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$2,113,911Health$1,857,584Housing & Shelter$1,084,756Education$158,975Community Improvement$95,500Other$51,540Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLOOMINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,456,411 over 4y, 35% of budgetCENTERSTONE OF INDIANA INC: $1,387,939 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER INC: $700,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $552,500 over 3y, 11% of budgetSOUTHERN INDIANA COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE: $459,539 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetSTABILITY FIRST INC: $384,756 over 1y, 16% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $152,975 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $105,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetLAWRENCE COUNTY ECONOMIC GROWTH COUNCIL INC: $95,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetGREATER BLOOMINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $35,550 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTandem Community Birth Center and Postpartum House Inc: $5,060 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY INDIANA: $5,046 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetINDIANA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMINGTON INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Indiana University Health Bloomington’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home