Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Indian Paintbrush Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$103M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$46M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$166MPhilanthropy$83MCivil Rights$38MHealth$22MHousing & Shelter$1.3MArts & Culture$1.0MAnimals$250kFood & Nutrition$250kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $700k
  • $250k+10 grants · $102M
$350,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY$46,000,000
FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC$37,500,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$5,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA$5,000,000
COLLEGE YEAR IN ATHENS INC$2,800,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE$2,500,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION$1,500,000
ST JOHNS HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000,000
CROHNS AND COLITIS FOUNDATION INC$500,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$350,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT INC$200,000
ALI FORNEY CENTER$200,000
PHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM$100,000
NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC$100,000
ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER INC$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEAVEN SOUTH INC: $13k → 14%WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
OR
WY
IN
PA
CA
CO
MD
TN
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$165M · 12 repeat orgs$64M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
30

Total granted

$165M
$20M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+15%

Still filing today

92%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationFood & NutritionCivil RightsHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DePauw University
    4× · 2020–2024 · $147M · revenue +55% · 42% of their budget
  • CY
    COLLEGE YEAR IN ATHENS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +148% · 48% of their budget
  • SJ
    St John's Health Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +267% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • SB
    Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $10M · revenue -27%
  • GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5.0M · revenue +131% · 47% of their budget
  • PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Foundation to Combat Anti-Semitism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Community College Foundatio…Pregnancy Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Development ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesEquine Therapy ProgramsJewish Community Organizati…Domestic Violence ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Animal Rescue and ShelterFood Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Cancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%1%35–55yr16%54%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/51
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,514

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
34/50
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DePauw University — $146,907,232 · EducationDePauw UniversityUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $5,600,000 · Education+3 more — $6,000,000 · EducationNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $73,050,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $5,000,000 · PhilanthropyGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUN…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $5,000,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSO…+2 more — $225,104 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC — $37,500,000 · Civil RightsFOUNDATION TO…+2 more — $800,000 · Civil RightsSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation — $10,000,000 · HealthSt John's Health Foundation — $2,000,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $1,000,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · Health+7 more — $1,467,500 · HealthCOLLEGE YEAR IN ATHENS INC — $7,825,000 · International+1 more — $5,000 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA — $5,000,000 · OtherSAG-AFTRA — $1,000,000 · Other+25 more — $1,947,500 · OtherMOUNT DESERT 365 — $725,000 · Community Improvement
Education$158,507,232Philanthropy$83,275,104Civil Rights$38,300,000Health$15,467,500International$7,830,000Other$7,947,500Community Improvement$725,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDePauw University — $146,907,232 over 4y, 42% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $73,050,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC — $37,500,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation — $10,000,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetCOLLEGE YEAR IN ATHENS INC — $7,825,000 over 3y, 48% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $5,600,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $5,000,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $5,000,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $5,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt John's Health Foundation — $2,000,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMOUNT DESERT 365 — $725,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $700,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON COLLEGE — $500,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $350,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM — $225,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetTRANSITION HOUSE — $200,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $150,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBETHESDA COMMUNITY BASE BALL CLUB — $100,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnimal Adoption Center Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSlow Money Institute Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $75,104 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL — $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAUXILIARY OF CITY HOSPITAL AT ELMHURST — $50,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetFriends of Acadia — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH & RECOVERY SERVICES OF JACKSON HOLE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Auxiliary Of Kings County Hospital — $25,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STORE INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Indian Paintbrush Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 20%
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc20% of income from government
  • Washington College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Indian Paintbrush Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Indian Paintbrush Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph