· Private foundation
Indian Paintbrush Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $700k
- $250k+10 grants · $102M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DEPAUW UNIVERSITY | $46,000,000 |
| FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC | $37,500,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | $5,000,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA | $5,000,000 |
| COLLEGE YEAR IN ATHENS INC | $2,800,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE | $2,500,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION | $1,500,000 |
| ST JOHNS HEALTH FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| CROHNS AND COLITIS FOUNDATION INC | $500,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA | $350,000 |
| THE TREVOR PROJECT INC | $200,000 |
| ALI FORNEY CENTER | $200,000 |
| PHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM | $100,000 |
| NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC | $100,000 |
| ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER INC | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
DePauw University4× · 2020–2024 · $147M · revenue +55% · 42% of their budget- CYCOLLEGE YEAR IN ATHENS INC3× · 2022–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +148% · 48% of their budget
- SJSt John's Health Foundation2× · 2023–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +267% · 31% of their budget
Funded once
- SBSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundationone grant, 2022 · $10M · revenue -27%
GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5.0M · revenue +131% · 47% of their budget
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INCone grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Foundation to Combat Anti-Semitism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DePauw University ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC ↗
- Who funds Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE YEAR IN ATHENS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT 365 ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds PHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds TRANSITION HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds BETHESDA COMMUNITY BASE BALL CLUB ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds Animal Adoption Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SECOND HELPINGS INC ↗
- Who funds Slow Money Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds AUXILIARY OF CITY HOSPITAL AT ELMHURST ↗
- Who funds Friends of Acadia ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Indian Paintbrush Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New Avenues for Youth Inc — 20% of income from government
- Washington College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Indian Paintbrush Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Indian Paintbrush Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.