Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Independent Arts & Media

Independent Arts & Media's mission is to steward and empower independent art and media projects that foster community and civic participation and facilitate cultural engagement and free expression.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$247k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$1.6MPhilanthropy$1.4MCommunity Improvement$429kEducation$379kEnvironment$256kYouth Development$228kCivil Rights$148kAnimals$103kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 18 grants below total $854,039 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,061,312 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $207,273 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $208k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $620k
$31,525
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CinemaSF$246,891
Art Forces$102,709
Upstream Podcast LLC$76,184
Little Boxes Theater$71,000
Lansing Journal LLC$67,000
Shaping San Francisco$55,836
Fatasilima LLC$38,025
Mpowerdance Company$36,000
Flamenco Arts International$31,525
Coalition to Grow San Francis$28,010
San Ramon Academy of Music$25,800
Dogpatch Collective LLC$21,820
Mendocino News Media LLC$15,237
San Francisco Art Book Fair$11,250
The Wild Hunt Inc$9,352
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Double Union: $9k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
NV
IN
CA
UT
CO
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 22 repeat orgs$845k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
18

Total granted

$2.5M
$314k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
-2%

Still filing today

18%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $531k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OAKLAND SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $346k · revenue +73%
  • TC
    THE CRUCIBLE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $133k · revenue +1%
  • K
    Kidnuz
    4× · 2020–2023 · $77k · revenue +87% · 58% of their budget

Funded once

  • TA
    The Atlantic Monthly Grp LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • A
    AMPED
    one grant, 2019 · $33k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $32k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sebastopol Center for the Arts

Enriching Lives Through the Arts

Arts & Culture
2
San Francisco Public Press

The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…

Education
3
Marin Open Studios

Marin open studios is a non-profit visual arts organization dedicated to engaging and supporting marin county artists and their audiences through events, programs and services. marin open studios champions a diverse and inclusive community…

Arts & Culture
4
Artist Trust

Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.

Arts & Culture
5
Southern Exposure

Southern Exposure (SoEx) is an artist-centered non-profit organization that is committed to supporting visual artists. Through our extensive and innovative programming, SoEx strives to experiment, collaborate and further educate while…

Arts & Culture
6
San Francisco Center for the Book

San Francisco Center For The Book is a center of inspiration for the Book Arts world, featuring the art and craft of letterpress printing, bookbinding, and artists' bookmaking. We are dedicated to the art of the book!

Education
7
Oregon Arts Watch

Oregon Arts Watch produces independent, professional arts and culture journalism and criticism that is transparent, fair and accurate.

Arts & Culture
8
Shotgun Players

Shotgun Players is a company of artists determined to create bold, relevant, affordable theatre that inspires and challenges audience and artist alike to re-examine our lives, our community, and the ever-changing world around us.

Arts & Culture
9
Theatre Flamenco of San Francisco

Theatre Flamenco of San Francisco aims to enrich and inspire both the art community and the general public through a blend of traditional and innovative flamenco. We produce imaginative, thematic shows that feature the talents of both…

Arts & Culture
10
Bay Area Creative Foundation

The Bay Area Creative Foundation celebrates, cultivates, and inspires creativity in youth and young adults. We believe in fostering a society that embodies creative spirit, art, and innovation.

Arts & Culture
11
ArtsSV

Founded in 2018 by a group of high-tech investors, and arts executives and advocates, ArtsSV is on the meaningful track of changing the cultural landscape of Silicon Valley.

Education
12
Cutting Ball Theater

The description of Cutting Ball Theater's mission starts on Form 990 Page 1 and continues on Schedule O

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Francisco Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Double Union. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Shaping San Francisco — $260,844 · OtherShaping San FranciscoCinemaSF — $246,891 · OtherCinemaSFThe Atlantic Monthly Group LLC — $216,000 · OtherThe Atlantic Monthly Group LLCCraftsmanship LLC — $188,109 · OtherCraftsmanship LLCThe Frisc — $182,714 · OtherThe FriscWe Wield the Hammer — $148,410 · OtherWe Wield the HammerGrotto Partners LLC — $146,533 · OtherGrotto Partners LLCPianoFight LLC — $137,182 · OtherWasatch Public Media — $125,724 · OtherMpowerdance Company — $98,061 · OtherLittle Boxes Theater — $93,700 · Other+31 more — $864,163 · Other+31 moreTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,415,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATIONOAKLAND SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS — $346,042 · EducationOAKLAND SCH…THE CRUCIBLE — $132,840 · EducationTHE CRUCIBL…Kidnuz — $76,824 · Youth DevelopmentFLAMENCO ARTS INTERNATIONAL — $31,525 · Arts & CultureSmall Press Traffic Literary Arts Center — $26,220 · Arts & CultureCoalition to Grow San Francisco - Grow SF — $28,010 · Civil RightsEAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT — $10,000 · Community ImprovementDOUBLE UNION — $9,034 · Human Services
Other$2,708,331Philanthropy$1,415,000Education$478,882Youth Development$76,824Arts & Culture$57,745Civil Rights$28,010Community Improvement$10,000Human Services$9,034

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,415,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOAKLAND SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS — $346,042 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CRUCIBLE — $132,840 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetKidnuz — $76,824 over 4y, 58% of budgetFLAMENCO ARTS INTERNATIONAL — $31,525 over 1y, 16% of budgetCoalition to Grow San Francisco - Grow SF — $28,010 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSmall Press Traffic Literary Arts Center — $26,220 over 2y, 15% of budgetEAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OAKLAND SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS
  • Who funds THE CRUCIBLE
  • Who funds Wasatch Public Media
  • Who funds Kidnuz
  • Who funds FLAMENCO ARTS INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds Coalition to Grow San Francisco - Grow SF
  • Who funds Small Press Traffic Literary Arts Center

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN4.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Independent Arts & Media funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Independent Arts & Media?

    Find your warmest path to Independent Arts & Media through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph