Skip to content
In Concertcare Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

In Concertcare Inc

Enhancing community health centers' capacity to care.

$258k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$611k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $243k
$20,777
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Health Care Inc$45,952
Primary Health Care Inc$43,002
Siouxland Community Health Center$41,047
Community Health Centers of Southeastern Iowa$27,352
River Hills Community Health Center$26,704
Peoples Community Health Clinic Inc$20,777
Infinity Health$15,276
Community Health Center of Fort Dodge$12,445
Crescent Community Health Center$10,933
All Care Health Center$8,727
United Community Health Center$5,828
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITED COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $9k → 10%PRIMARY HEALTH CARE INC: $94k → 10%CRESCENT COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $50k → 11%ALL CARE HEALTH CENTER: $9k → 12%COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE: $62k → 12%Community Health Center of Fort Dodge: $12k → 13%Siouxland Community Health Center: $41k → 13%COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTHEASTERN IA: $41k → 15%RIVER HILLS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $29k → 16%PEOPLES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $17k → 17%Infinity Health: $15k → 18%United Community Health Center: $6k → 10%Primary Health Care Inc: $43k → 10%Peoples Community Health Clinic Inc: $21k → 11%All Care Health Center: $9k → 12%Community Health Care Inc: $46k → 12%SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $35k → 13%Community Health Centers of Southeastern Iowa: $27k → 15%River Hills Community Health Center: $27k → 16%INFINITY HEALTH: $7k → 18%Crescent Community Health Center: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$598k · 10 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$598k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PRIMARY HEALTH CARE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $137k · revenue +9%
  • CH
    Community Health Care Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $108k · revenue +22%
  • SC
    Siouxland Community Health Center
    2× · 2023–2024 · $77k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF FORT DODGE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
2
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
3
Community Health Center of Se Kansas Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
4
Greater Sioux Community Health Center Inc

The mission of promise community health center is to provide accessible, holistic health care that adapts to the needs of the community to improve the wellbeing of all persons.

Health
5
Universal Community Health Center

The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.

Health
6
Community Clinic of Maui Inc

To provide culturally sensitive, coordinated primary care services emphasizing education, prevention, and advocacy, regardless of one's ability to pay.

Health
7
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
8
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
9
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
10
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
11
Community Health Systems Inc

Operate primary health care clinics, ultrasound, ob/gyn and five pharmacies.

—
12
Community Health Center of Central Wyoming Inc

To maintain a high quality patient care delivery system that provides access to comprehensive health care services, regardless of ability to pay. it is the desire of chccw to treat all patients with the dignity and respect they deserve…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Health Center of Fort Dodge Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRIMARY HEALTH CARE INC: $136,680 · HealthPRIMARY HEALTH CARE INCSiouxland Community Health Center: $76,528 · HealthSiouxland Community Health CenterCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTHEASTERN IOWA INC: $68,151 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTHEASTERN IOWA INCCrescent Community Health Center: $61,219 · HealthCrescent Community Health CenterRIVER HILLS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $55,354 · HealthRIVER HILLS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCPEOPLES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $38,161 · HealthPEOPLES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INCINFINITY HEALTH: $22,439 · HealthALL CARE HEALTH CENTER: $17,470 · Health+2 more: $26,868 · Health+2 moreCommunity Health Care Inc: $107,820 · OtherCommunity Health Car…
Health$502,870Other$107,820

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRIMARY HEALTH CARE INC: $136,680 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Health Care Inc: $107,820 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSiouxland Community Health Center: $76,528 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTHEASTERN IOWA INC: $68,151 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCrescent Community Health Center: $61,219 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRIVER HILLS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $55,354 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $38,161 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINFINITY HEALTH: $22,439 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALL CARE HEALTH CENTER: $17,470 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $14,423 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF FORT DODGE INC: $12,445 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Iowa Primary Care Ass…Delta Dental of Iowa …American Cancer Socie…Direct ReliefAmazonsmile Foundation
Iowa Primary Care Association IncIA24.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Iowa Primary Care Association Inc · Delta Dental of Iowa Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Direct Relief · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization In Concertcare Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from In Concertcare Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on In Concertcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home