Skip to content

· Private foundation

Impart Group Inc

Contribute financial support to organizations for charitable, religious and educational purposes.

$100k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

International$87kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kReligion$20kCrime & Legal$17kArts & Culture$16kYouth Development$16kEducation$10kHealth$8k
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$622k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Church of Jesus Christ$30,000
University of Utah Healthcare$20,000
Birch Creek Service Ranch$10,000
Church of Jesus Christ$10,000
Ballet West$10,000
Church of Jesus Christ$10,000
Fair Trade USA$5,000
End Exploitation Montana$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 21% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%End Exploitation Montana: $5k → 9%Operation Underground Railroad Inc: $6k → 10%Fair Trade USA: $5k → 10%Global Giving Foundation: $5k → 14%University of Utah Healthcare: $20k → 8%Birch Creek Service Ranch: $10k → 15%University of Utah: $8k → 8%Birch Creek Service Ranch: $6k → 15%Church of Jesus Christ: $30k → 8%Church of Jesus Christ: $10k → 8%Church of Jesus Christ: $10k → 8%Corporation Of The President: $28k → 8%Fight Against Domestic Violence: $5k → 8%Corporation of the President: $18k → 8%Internet Safety Kids: $5k → 8%LDS Business College: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Redemption Ridge

Redemption Ridge is dedicated to bringing hope and healing to young girls rescued from the horrendous world of sex trafficking. We are committed to redeeming lives, restoring dignity and placing purpose in hearts of these precious children.

—
2
Our Daughters International

We exist to bring an end to human trafficking in Nepal, and to see lives and communities transformed

Human Services
3
Freed Life

Freed Life exists to eradicate human trafficking through empowering survivors, equipping communities and changing systems.

—
4
Wyoming Coalition Against Domestic Violence and Se

Through a collective voice, the Wyoming Coalition Against Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault is committed to provide leadership, education, and systems advocacy to advance social change and end violence.

—
5
Colorado Coalition Against Sexual Assault

Advocates against sexual assault

Crime & Legal
6
Prevention Now Inc

Prevention now leverages data and technology to stop human trafficking before it starts.

Human Services
7
Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Advancing the well-being of all coloradans through relationships free from abuse and oppression.

Human Services
8
Weave Inc

To promote safe and healthy relationships and support survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence, and sex trafficking. weave's vision is: when everyone acts, violence ends.

—
9
In Our Backyard

Linking arms across America in the fight against human trafficking through awareness, education, outreach events, survivor advocacy, legislative advising, and engagement of key partners.

Crime & Legal
10
Bakhita Mountain Home Inc

To support women in healing from the trauma of sexual exploitation and in achieving independence by providing an established residential home, trauma informed practices, and life enhancing skills.

Human Services
11
She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…

International
12
Every Woman Treaty Inc

Every Woman is a global coalition of more than 4,000 womens rights advocates and organisations in 165 nations advancing a treaty to end violence against women and girls in the form of a new Optional Protocol to CEDAW. We catalyse…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our Rescue; the most unlike its peers is End Exploitation Montana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $96,350 · OtherCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSUniversity of Utah Healthcare: $20,000 · OtherUniversity of Utah HealthcareUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $8,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHINTERNET SAFETY KIDS: $5,300 · OtherENSIGN COLLEGE: $4,500 · OtherYELLOWSTONE CASA INC: $6,400 · Crime & LegalYELLOWSTO…Fight Against Domestic Violence: $5,300 · Crime & LegalFight Aga…END EXPLOITATION MONTANA: $5,000 · Crime & LegalEND EXPLO…BIRCH CREEK SERVICE RANCH: $16,400 · Youth DevelopmentBIRCH CRE…BALLET WEST: $10,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET WE…OUR RESCUE: $6,400 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCU…GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $5,300 · InternationalTRANSFAIR USA: $5,000 · International
Other$134,150Crime & Legal$16,700Youth Development$16,400Arts & Culture$16,400International$10,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIRCH CREEK SERVICE RANCH: $16,400 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetBALLET WEST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYELLOWSTONE CASA INC: $6,400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $6,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFight Against Domestic Violence: $5,300 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $5,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEND EXPLOITATION MONTANA: $5,000 over 1y, 70% of budgetTRANSFAIR USA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Impart Group Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Impart Group Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Impart Group Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Impart Group Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Impart Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph