Skip to content
Impact100 Oakland County at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Impact100 Oakland County

Provide high impact grants to non profits serving oakland county.

$292k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$97k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$454kEducation$258kHuman Services$197kCrime & Legal$188kRecreation & Sports$102kYouth Development$102kCommunity Improvement$100kFood & Nutrition$97kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$97,333
Median grant
1
States reached
$469k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARE HOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC$97,334
HOSPITALITY HOUSE$97,333
HOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKING$97,333
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $370k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $97k → 8%ENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDERN INC: $100k → 8%LIVING AND LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENT: $82k → 8%HOPE HOSPITALITY & WARMING CENTER: $91k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
2
Lighthouse of Oakland County

To support lighthouse mi in their mission to build equitable communities and alleviate poverty in partnership with and in service to individuals, families, and organizations.

Human Services
3
Oak Orchard Community Health Centerinc

To cultivate patient-centered health and wellness by providing engaged and innovative health care for our community.

Health
4
South Oakland Shelter

Lighthouse mi endeavors to build equitable communities and alleviate poverty in partnership with and in service to individuals, families, and organizations.

Housing & Shelter
5
Ozone House Inc

Ozone house provides holistic support and housing services that enhance the well-being and safety of young people through empowerment, advocacy, and connection.

Human Services
6
Oakland Private Industry Council in C

Provide accessible high-quality training & employment services to local residents and employers.

Community Improvement
7
Erie Homes for Children & Adults Inc

Erie homes for children and adults operates as a private, non-profit agency providing programs for individuals with intellectual and physical disabilities.

Health
8
Hope Medical Clinic Inc

Hope is a not-for-profit interdenominational christian medical, dental, and social service organization. hope's goal is to provide compassionate and practical help, ministering to the whole person with dignity and respect. this includes…

—
9
Oakland Family Services

To provide quality treatment, education and prevention services to meet human service needs in the community

Human Services
10
Habitat for Humanity of Oakland County Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity of Oakland County brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
11
Oakland Integrated Healthcare Network

To provide for the health and wellness needs of the underserved of Oakland County through the provision of comprehensive, integrated primary, behavioral health, and dental care.

Health
12
Humanistic Alternatives to Addiction Research & Treatment Inc

Haart is a non-profit organization dedicated to serving the community by reducing the harmful effects of opiate and opioid abuse and dependence, and opiate combined with poly-substance abuse, on individuals and their families. haart's…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ennis Center for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Families Against Narcotics Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INCHOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKING: $97,333 · Human ServicesHOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKINGHOSPITALITY HOUSE: $97,333 · Human ServicesHOSPITALITY HOUSEHOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER INC: $91,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER…OAKLAND LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY: $85,000 · Human ServicesOAKLAND LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVICE AG…LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $82,000 · Human ServicesLIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTERFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $102,000 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CIRCLEURBAN LEAGUE OF DETROIT AND SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $100,000 · OtherURBAN LEAGUE OF DETROIT AND S…FAMILIES AGAINST NARCOTICS INC: $85,000 · OtherFAMILIES AGAINST NARCOTICS IN…DETROIT AREA PRE-COLLEGE ENGINEERING PROGRAM INC: $85,000 · OtherDETROIT AREA PRE-COLLEGE ENGI…OAKLAND LITERACY COUNCIL: $82,000 · OtherOAKLAND LITERACY COUNCILKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $102,000 · HealthKIDS KICKING …DR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $100,000 · HealthDR GARY BURNS…CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC: $97,334 · Crime & LegalCAREHOUSE OF…HAVEN INC: $91,000 · Crime & LegalHAVEN INCEton Academy: $91,000 · EducationEton Academ…ACCENT PONTIAC INC: $82,000 · EducationACCENT PONT…CROSSROADS FOR YOUTH: $102,000 · Recreation & SportsWORLD MEDICAL RELIEF INCORPORATED: $82,000 · International
Human Services$552,666Other$454,000Health$202,000Crime & Legal$188,334Education$173,000Recreation & Sports$102,000International$82,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROSSROADS FOR YOUTH: $102,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF DETROIT AND SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetDR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC: $97,334 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKING: $97,333 over 1y, 21% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE: $97,333 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetEton Academy: $91,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHAVEN INC: $91,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHOPE HOSPITALITY AND WARMING CENTER INC: $91,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetDETROIT AREA PRE-COLLEGE ENGINEERING PROGRAM INC: $85,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetOAKLAND LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY: $85,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOAKLAND LITERACY COUNCIL: $82,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetWORLD MEDICAL RELIEF INCORPORATED: $82,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACCENT PONTIAC INC: $82,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetLIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $82,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way for Southe…Community Foundation …DTE Energy FoundationFord PhilanthropyThe Village Club Foun…The Jewish FundConsumers Energy Foun…Molinello Family Foun…Phillip and Elizabeth…Canton Community Foun…Trinity Health - Mich…United Jewish Foundat…
United Way for Southeastern MichiganMI31.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · DTE Energy Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · The Village Club Foundation · The Jewish Fund · Consumers Energy Foundation · Molinello Family Foundation · Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer Memorial · Canton Community Foundation Inc · Trinity Health - Michigan · United Jewish Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Impact100 Oakland County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Impact100 Oakland County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Impact100 Oakland County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home