Skip to content

Utah · Public charity

Impact Foundation

Sharing the healing powere of nature

$73k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2024
13
Organizations funded FY2022
85%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$70k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 13
FY2020 to FY2022
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$277k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 85% of the organizations Impact Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 62% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22
InternationalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving3$70k33%
FY202213$160k85%
FY20215$103k80%
FY20206$80kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$189kInternational$82kHealth$80kPublic Safety & Disaster$27kArts & Culture$20kHousing & Shelter$10kEducation$5k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
MI
NY
IA
CA
UT
DC
HI
OK
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of Impact Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc$156,61740%
Feed My Starving Children Inc$46,23820%
Intermountain Front Range Inc$25,00010%
Sinclair Broadcast Group$20,0001n/a
Project Hawaii Inc$10,00011%
American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches$10,00010%
United States Fund for Unicef$5,33810%
Bonneville Charitable Foundation$5,0001n/a
GenYOUTH Incorporated$3,10010%
Type of Wood Charities$2,50010%
Feed the Children Inc$50010%

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($129k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Impact Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVitamin Angel Alliance Inc: $156,617 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFeed My Starving Children Inc: $46,238 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIntermountain Front Range Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Hawaii Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Fund for Unicef: $5,338 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGenYOUTH Incorporated: $3,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetType of Wood Charities: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFeed the Children Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Impact Foundation with peer funders

About Impact Foundation

How much does Impact Foundation give?
Impact Foundation reported 3 itemized grants totaling $70,000, out of $72,600 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 13 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2022.
What does Impact Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (46%), International (20%), Health (19%).
Who are Impact Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc ($157k), Feed My Starving Children Inc ($46k), Intermountain Front Range Inc ($25k).
Does Impact Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 85% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Impact Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Network for Good, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Impact Foundation based?
Impact Foundation is based in UT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $75k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Impact’s filings →

More from the funding graph