· Public charity
Impact 100 Greater Indianapolis Inc
Impact 100 Greater Indianapolis, Inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Coburn Place | $50,000 |
| Big Car Media Inc | $15,000 |
| Humane Society of Indianapolis Inc | $15,000 |
| Nine 13 Inc | $15,000 |
| Indiana Diaper Bank | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $546k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NONEUROHOPE OF INDIANA INC3× · 2018–2023 · $129k · revenue +66%
- FPFAMILY PROMISE OF HENDRICKS COUNTY INC2× · 2019–2021 · $124k · revenue +839%
- BCBROOKSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION2× · 2018–2019 · $100k · revenue +170%
Funded once
- NINEIGHBORLINK INDIANAPOLIS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +15%
- 9P91 PLACE INCone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
- VOVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICAone grant, 2018 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.
Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…
At indiana guardianship services, inc., we are dedicated to providing our clients with the same compassion, attention, and patience as our own family. through competence, service, and dignity, we uphold the values of the national…
The indiana justice project is a non-partisan, non-profit legal advocacy organization. we use all available legal tools to ensure equal justice and opportunity for all hoosiers. we focus on health, housing, and food insecurity.
Insight development corporation fosters low-income housing in and around indianapolis, indiana and the surrounding community.
Circle up indy seeks to improve the quality of life for all residents of indianapolis by addressing issues of violence; by tackling the perpetual disparities of economics, education, and employment; in addition to mental and physical…
To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.
The mission of indy hunger network is to address systemic hunger issues and eliminate disparities in the greater indianapolis hunger relief system through collaboration on programs, advocacy, and research.
Faith in Indiana (formerly IndyCAN) is a catalyst for faith communities and marginalized peoples to act collectively for racial and economic justice in Indiana. FaithIN develops civic leaders directly impacted by inequality, awakens the…
To reduce recidivism and rebuild lives through the dignity of work.
Assist indiana provides advocacy, specialized services, interventions and support to trauma victims. utilizing proven efforts through trauma informed care approach along with best practices, we eliminate the negative effects of violence in…
Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westminster Neighborhood Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Paws & Think Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEUROHOPE OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF HENDRICKS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds KENNEDY KING MEMORIAL INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORLINK INDIANAPOLIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds 91 PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds TRINITY HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds UNCONDITIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds PAWS & THINK INC ↗
- Who funds COBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC ↗
- Who funds NINE 13 INC ↗
- Who funds YOU YES YOU PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FIDO INC ↗
- Who funds CLAUDE MCNEAL'S MUSICAL THEATRE TRAINING PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds Elevate Indianapolis Inc ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BEACON OF HOPE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS SHAKESPEARE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION AGAINST COMPANION-ANIMAL EUTHANASIA INC ↗
- Who funds PHALEN LEADERSHIP ACADEMY - INDIANA ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds INDIANA DIAPER BANK INC ↗
- Who funds BIG CAR MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds STEP-UP INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FREEWHEELIN COMMUNITY BIKES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ALLIANCE OF THE FAR EASTSIDE INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA ARTISAN INC ↗
- Who funds Medical Mutts Service Dogs Inc ↗
- Who funds IIBADA DANCERS INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' VOICE OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds EARTH CHARTER INDIANA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Indiana Youth Institute Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Hoover Family Foundation · Rotary Foundation of Indianapolis Inc · Indianapolis Neighborhood Housing Partnership Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Impact 100 Greater Indianapolis Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.