Skip to content

· Private foundation

Immordino Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$77kHealth$46kHuman Services$29kHousing & Shelter$23kEnvironment$10kEducation$10kFood & Nutrition$9kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,750
Median grant
3
States reached
$619k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Affordable Housing for Artists$7,750
Fractured Atlas$7,750
Make A Wish Foundation$7,750
Individual grant recipient$7,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Our Lady of Peace: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
NV
IA
OH
CA
CO
AZ
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Immordino Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 23% of the giving stays in NV; by stated purpose, 25%.

Immordino Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 5 repeat orgs$172k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
29

Total granted

$59k
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+1%

Still filing today

60%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRACTURED ATLAS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $13k · revenue 0%
  • AP
    AHA Projects
    2× · 2024–2025 · $13k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $13k

Funded once

  • TC
    TEXARKANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +109%
  • LC
    LA Center of Photography
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SP
    SEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Contemporary Art Review Los Angeles

Contemporary Art Review Los Angeles (Carla) is a Los Angeles-based nonprofit organization and publishing platform that is dedicated to providing inclusive perspectives on contemporary art. Publishing in both print and online, Carla is an…

Arts & Culture
2
Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions Inc

Lace both champions and challenges the art of our time by fostering artists who innovate, explore, and risk. we move within and beyond our four walls to provide opportunities for diverse publics to engage deeply with contemporary art. in…

Arts & Culture
3
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
4
Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
5
Oakland Museum of California

The museum's mission is to inspire all californians to create a more vibrant future for themselves and their communities. through collections, exhibitions, education programs, and public dialogue, we inspire people of all ages and…

Arts & Culture
6
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
7
Museum of Latin American Art

The specific purpose of this corporation is to: expand knowledge and appreciation of modern and contemporary latin american tine art that has been created since world war ii; to operate a museum; to collect and display latin american…

Arts & Culture
8
Artnoir Inc

ARTNOIR is a global collective and a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization with a mission to celebrate and highlight the work of creatives of color from around the world while catalyzing cultural equity across the arts and culture industries.…

Arts & Culture
9
Artpace Inc (Audit)

Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.

Arts & Culture
10
Minnesota Museum of American Art

The m inspires understandings of identities, experiences, and complex truths through american art.

Arts & Culture
11
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
12
Apex Art Curatorial Program Inc

Apex Art Curatorial Program is a resolutely noncommercial visual art exhibition space which provides curators and artists with a venue dedicated to ideas that are often too provocative or too small in scope for display elsewhere. Apex Art…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our Lady of Peace; the most unlike its peers is Texarkana College Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
10/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $12,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMake A Wish Foundation: $12,750 · OtherMake A Wish FoundationLA Center of Photography: $10,000 · OtherLA Center of PhotographyUniversity of Arizona: $10,000 · OtherUniversity of ArizonaMEDIUM PHOTOGRAPHY INC DBA MEDIUM PHOTO: $7,500 · OtherMEDIUM PHOTOGRAPHY INC DBA MEDIUM PHOTOSt Judes Ranch for Children - Boulder City: $6,000 · OtherNV Desert Valley Chapter of AOSA: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherSouthern NV Public TV (Vegas PBS): $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherNV School of the Arts: $5,000 · OtherTHE SHADE TREE INC: $5,000 · OtherUSC: $5,000 · OtherHabitat for Humanity: $5,000 · OtherPABLOVE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · OtherPABLOVE FOUNDATION INCSPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC: $6,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF PEACE: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $6,500 · OtherMAYO CLINIC: $10,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICCANDO CANCER: $6,500 · HealthCANDO CANCERBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthBENEVOLENT HEALTHC…FUTURE SMILES: $6,000 · HealthFUTURE SMILESCaringBridge: $5,000 · HealthCaringBridgeHOLDYOU FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthHOLDYOU FOUNDATION…FRACTURED ATLAS INC: $12,750 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS …ART SHARE LOS ANGELES: $6,000 · Arts & CultureART SHARE LOS AN…MUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $6,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATE…VENICE ARTS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureVENICE ARTSAMERICAN ORFF-SCHULWERK ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN ORFF-SC…AHA Projects: $12,750 · Housing & ShelterTEXARKANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationSEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCY: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHREE SQUARE: $8,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$126,000Health$38,500Arts & Culture$34,750Housing & Shelter$12,750Education$10,000Environment$10,000Food & Nutrition$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $12,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAHA Projects: $12,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEXARKANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIUM PHOTOGRAPHY INC DBA MEDIUM PHOTO: $7,500 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetPABLOVE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetART SHARE LOS ANGELES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFUTURE SMILES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE ARTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN ORFF-SCHULWERK ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOUR LADY OF PEACE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCaringBridge: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHADE TREE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOLDYOU FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE ARROYO ARTS COLLECTIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Immordino Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Immordino Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Immordino Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Immordino Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Immordino’s filings →

    More from the funding graph