Skip to content
Immanuel Community Vision Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Immanuel Community Vision Foundation

Recognizing that all we have comes from god, we have been called to be faithful and courageous stewards of god's resources.

$3.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
64
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$390k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$6.5MReligion$4.3MHealth$4.0MHousing & Shelter$2.4MFood & Nutrition$2.3MEducation$1.5MCrime & Legal$907kYouth Development$902kOther$0
02FY2025 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k41 grants · $935k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+2 grants · $640k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$89M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEBRASKA SYNOD OF THE EVANGELICALS$390,000
INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER$250,000
LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES$195,000
NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRY$160,000
MOSAIC$125,000
WARTBURG THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$105,000
TABITHA INC$100,000
MIDLAND UNIVERSITY$90,000
NEBRASKA LUTHERAN CAMPUS MINISTRY$85,000
OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC$75,000
HEART MINISTRY CENTER$75,000
LEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA$75,000
DENTAL CONNECTIONS INC$60,000
ONE WORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$60,000
CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PERKINS COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $65k → 11%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $300k → 12%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $173k → 18%MADISON COUNTY ELDERLY SERVICE: $40k → 7%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $250k → 12%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $105k → 18%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $47k → 12%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $100k → 18%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $40k → 12%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $75k → 18%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $40k → 12%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $75k → 18%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $70k → 18%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $70k → 18%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 12%CHILDREN'S SQUARE USA: $60k → 12%HELP ADULT SERVICES: $50k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $40k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $40k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $40k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $40k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $40k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $200k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $195k → 12%PROJECT HOUSEWORKS: $75k → 12%TOGETHER INC: $50k → 12%PROJECT HOUSEWORKS: $45k → 12%TOGETHER INC: $40k → 12%PROJECT HOUSEWORKS: $40k → 12%PROJECT HOUSEWORKS: $40k → 12%PROJECT HOUSEWORKS: $40k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $50k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $270k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE: $130k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE: $105k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA: $100k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE: $75k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE: $75k → 12%THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE: $50k → 12%THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE: $45k → 12%THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE: $42k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $45k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $40k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $40k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $40k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $40k → 12%CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER: $60k → 12%CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Immanuel Community Vision Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in NE; by stated purpose, 81%.

Immanuel Community Vision Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 114 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

114 repeat relationships: 53 still active in FY2025, 61 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

114
60

Total granted

$23M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+21%

Still filing today

75%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $310k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +55%
  • NL
    NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES
    7× · 2017–2025 · $920k · revenue +69%
  • M
    MOSAIC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $865k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • SA
    SAN ANDRES LUTHERAN COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2024 · $130k
  • PC
    PERKINS CO SENIOR SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $65k · revenue -28% · 26% of their budget
  • LC
    LINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
2
Martin Luther Home Corporation

To provide healthcare and other related services for aging persons regardless of the ability of residents to pay for these services.

—
3
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
4
Heartland Community Health Network Inc

Heartland community health network exists to support and strengthen its federally qualified health center members through collaboration, information-sharing and integration of administrative, fiscal and clinical operations.

Health
5
Prairie Harvest Mental Health

We promote independence and an enhanced quality of life for adults with serious mental illness.

Human Services
6
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
7
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
8
Vna Hospice of Southwest Iowa

Cherishing life's journey through an extraordinary commitment to compassion, comfort and holistic care.

—
9
Jefferson Community Health Center Inc

Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.

Health
10
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
11
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heartland Family Service; the most unlike its peers is Susan Laflesche Picotte Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

129 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 129 of the 185 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
37
Early backer (in before they grew)
126/129
Grantees still filing
89/129
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEBRASKA SYNOD OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA: $2,892,912 · OtherNEBRASKA SYNOD OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMER…Tabitha Inc: $2,605,000 · OtherTabitha IncNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES: $919,500 · OtherNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIESNEBRASKA LUTHERAN CAMPUS MINISTRY INC: $702,600 · OtherNEBRASKA LUTHERAN CAMPUS MINISTRY INCWARTBURG THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $640,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY AT CHICAGO: $445,000 · OtherBLUE VALLEY LUTHERAN HOMES SOCIETY INC: $444,107 · Other+94 more: $3,667,144 · Other+94 moreLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $1,149,622 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF…INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $792,500 · Human ServicesINTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTEROAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $731,580 · Human ServicesOAKS INDIAN MISSION INCCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $310,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOUSEWORKS: $290,000 · Human ServicesJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA: $270,000 · Human ServicesTOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA: $200,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $195,000 · Human Services+29 more: $1,875,381 · Human Services+29 moreCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES: $300,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY…INTERFAITH HEALTH SERVICE: $238,000 · HealthINTERFAIT…ALL CARE HEALTH CENTER: $190,000 · HealthALL CARE …CHICANO AWARENESS CENTER INC: $190,000 · HealthCHICANO A…DENTAL CONNECTIONS INC: $170,000 · HealthDENTAL CO…RADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC: $111,000 · HealthRADIO TAL…The Tabitha Foundation Inc: $100,000 · HealthCORNBELT DIABETES CONNECTION INC: $88,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $85,000 · HealthHARBOR HOUSE: $80,000 · HealthOLLIE WEBB CENTER INC: $80,000 · Health+13 more: $328,442 · Health+13 moreMOSAIC: $865,000 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $225,000 · Housing & ShelterCARE CORPS' LIFEHOUSE: $142,500 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER PLATTE VALLEY EAST INC: $135,000 · Housing & ShelterSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $135,000 · Housing & ShelterMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $98,000 · Housing & Shelter+5 more: $165,000 · Housing & ShelterMIDLAND UNIVERSITY: $830,000 · EducationSUSAN LAFLESCHE PICOTTE CENTER: $40,000 · EducationHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $400,000 · Food & NutritionSAVING GRACE PERISHABLE FOOD RESCUE INC: $205,000 · Food & NutritionNO MORE EMPTY POTS: $94,000 · Food & NutritionNEBRASKA DIAPER BANK: $65,000 · Food & NutritionTABLE OF GRACE MOBILE FOOD PANTRY: $35,000 · Food & NutritionLEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA: $395,000 · Crime & LegalIowa Legal Aid: $135,000 · Crime & LegalNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $53,000 · Crime & LegalPROJECT HARMONY: $40,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $7,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$12,316,263Human Services$5,814,083Health$1,960,942Housing & Shelter$1,765,500Education$870,000Food & Nutrition$799,000Crime & Legal$630,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTabitha Inc: $2,605,000 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $1,149,622 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES: $919,500 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetMOSAIC: $865,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMIDLAND UNIVERSITY: $830,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetINTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $792,500 over 9y, 12% of budgetOAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $731,580 over 9y, 12% of budgetBLUE VALLEY LUTHERAN HOMES SOCIETY INC: $444,107 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $405,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $400,000 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetLEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA: $395,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $310,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES: $300,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT HOUSEWORKS: $290,000 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA: $270,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetINTERFAITH HEALTH SERVICE: $238,000 over 9y, 24% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $225,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSAVING GRACE PERISHABLE FOOD RESCUE INC: $205,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetTOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA: $200,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $195,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetALL CARE HEALTH CENTER: $190,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $190,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHICANO AWARENESS CENTER INC: $190,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetTABLE GRACE MINISTRIES: $185,000 over 7y, 9.9% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $185,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVolunteers Assisting Seniors: $179,500 over 9y, 12% of budgetLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC: $171,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDENTAL CONNECTIONS INC: $170,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetGRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE: $156,500 over 5y, 10% of budgetCARE CORPS' LIFEHOUSE: $142,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER: $140,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT HOPE INC: $137,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PLATTE VALLEY EAST INC: $135,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetIowa Legal Aid: $135,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWHYARTS INC: $135,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $135,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHRISTIAN HOME ASSN - CHILDREN'S SQUARE USA: $125,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHELP ADULT SERVICES INC: $122,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetCHADRON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $112,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC: $111,000 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetThe Tabitha Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $98,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCITY SPROUTS INC: $95,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetNO MORE EMPTY POTS: $94,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS: $93,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFONTENELLE FOREST: $90,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCORNBELT DIABETES CONNECTION INC: $88,500 over 7y, 26% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Tabitha Inc ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE VALLEY LUTHERAN HOMES SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOUSEWORKS ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH HEALTH SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SAVING GRACE PERISHABLE FOOD RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ALL CARE HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds CHICANO AWARENESS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TABLE GRACE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds Volunteers Assisting Seniors ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds DENTAL CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds GRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE ↗
  • Who funds CARE CORPS' LIFEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER PLATTE VALLEY EAST INC ↗
  • Who funds Iowa Legal Aid ↗
  • Who funds WHYARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationThe Sherwood Foundati…The Hawks FoundationMutual of Omaha Found…Weitz Family Foundati…United Way of the Mid…Leland J & Dorothy H …Robert B Daugherty Fo…Suzanne & Walter Scot…Gilbert M and Martha …Nebraska Community Fo…Peter Kiewit Foundati…
The Lozier FoundationNE130.1× affinity68 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Immanuel Community Vision Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Immanuel Community Vision Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 185 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Immanuel Community Vision’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home