Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Imb Foundation Dba the Richardson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$378k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of IMB FOUNDATION DBA THE RICHARDSON FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $255k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSPIRE ACCESS INC$100,000
REGINALD LEWIS MUSEUM$100,000
COUNCIL OF URBAN PROFESSIONALS INST$55,000
JUNE BUG MAGIC MOMENTS$25,000
ROBERT TIOGO FOUNDATION$25,000
BLACK ECONOMIC ALLIANCE FOUNATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,325
APOLLO THEATRE FOUNDATION$10,000
BOYSGIRLS CLUB$5,000
CHILMARK TOWN AFFAIRS COUNCIL$5,000
GIRLS LEADERSHIP$5,000
EL HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,700
PAVE$2,500
51VETS ORG$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 78% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILMARK TOWN AFFAIRS COUNCIL: $5k → 8%STUDENT CLUB - HARVARD BUS SCHOOL: $10k → 16%ROBERT TIOGO FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%J3 FOUNDATION SPONSORSHIP: $5k → 14%EMPOWERING AFRICA: $4k → 17%THE PROMISE VENTURE: $25k → 10%BOYSGIRLS CLUB: $5k → 14%DONORS OF COLOR: $10k → 8%51VETS ORG: $3k → 13%GIRLS LEADERSHIP: $5k → 10%INSPIRE ACCESS INC: $100k → 8%REGINALD LEWIS MUSEUM: $100k → 19%ROBERT TIOGO FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%JUNE BUG MAGIC MOMENTS: $25k → 14%ALLSTAR CODE INC: $5k → 17%BOYSGIRLS CLUB: $5k → 14%GIRLS LEADERSHIP: $5k → 10%APOLLO THEATRE FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%BLACK ECONOMIC ALLIANCE FOUNATION: $25k → 14%COUNCIL OF URBAN PROFESSIONALS INST: $55k → 17%NAIC SPONSORSHIP: $30k → 14%COUNCIL OF URBAN PROFESSIONALS INST: $48k → 17%PAVE: $3k → 14%READAHEAD ORGANIZATION: $1k → 17%PAVE: $3k → 14%EL HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $4k → 14%EL HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
MD
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$169k · 6 repeat orgs$357k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against -46% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$169k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-46%

Still filing today

50%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $282k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COUNCIL OF URBAN PROFESSIONALS INSTITUTE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $103k · revenue +10%
  • RT
    ROBERT TIOGO FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $33k
  • GL
    GIRLS LEADERSHIP
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • SC
    STUDENT CLUB - HARVARD BUS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pave Academy Charter School

Pave is a k-8 college-preparatory charter school that lays the foundation for a productive and choice-filled life. we build our students brick by brick; equipping them with the academic, social, and emotional skills that they need to…

Education
2
Cesar Chavez Public Charter School for Public Policy

To prepare students to succeed in competitive colleges and to empower them to use public policy to create a more just, free, and equal world.

Education
3
Apex for Youth Inc

Apex for youth delivers possibilities to underserved asian and immigrant youth from low-income families in nyc. apex recruits working professionals to volunteer and become positive role models who inspire youth to expand their horizons and…

Community Improvement
4
Achievement Preparatory Academy Public Charter School

To prepare students to excel as high-achieving scholars and leaders in high school, college and beyond.

Education
5
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
6
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

7
Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School

We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.

8
Digital Pioneers Academy Public Charter School

The mission of digital pioneers academy (dpa) is to develop the next generation of innovators. we prepare students to meet or exceed the highest academic standards, while cultivating the strength of character necessary to both graduate…

Education
9
Providence Englewood School Corporation

Providence englewood school corporation is a pre-kindergarten through 8th grade charter school serving the englewood community. our mission is to prepare our students for responsible citizenship and a successful high school career leading…

Education
10
The Seed Public Charter School of Washington Dc

The seed public charter school of washington, dc is a public college-preparatory boarding school whose primary mission is to provide an outstanding intensive educational program that prepares children, both academically and socially, for…

Education
11
American Council On Education

Ace leads higher education with a united vision for the future, galvanizing our members to make change. the council collaborates across the sector to design solutions for today's challenges, serves the needs of a diverse student…

Education
12
Confluence Academy

As a collaborative network of unique schools in an urban setting, confluence develops the whole child by providing experiences that require critical thinking, creativity, and empathy to equip graduates to become leaders in a changing…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inspire Access and the most unlike its peers is The Council of Urban Professionals Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGINALD LEWIS MUSEUM — $100,000 · OtherREGINALD LEWIS MUSEUMROBERT TIOGO FOUNDATION — $32,500 · OtherROBERT TIOGO FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJUNE BUG MAGIC MOMENTS — $25,000 · OtherJUNE BUG MAGIC MOMENTSIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $10,325 · OtherGIRLS LEADERSHIP — $10,000 · OtherSTUDENT CLUB - HARVARD BUS SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherBOYSGIRLS CLUB — $10,000 · Other+4 more — $11,742 · OtherINSPIRE ACCESS — $100,000 · PhilanthropyINSPIRE ACCESSBLACK ECONOMIC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyBLACK ECONOMIC ALLIANCE FO…THE COUNCIL OF URBAN PROFESSIONALS INSTITUTE — $103,000 · Community ImprovementTHE COUNCIL OF URBAN P…EUPHEMIA L HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $8,000 · EducationPAVE INC DBA PARENTS AMPLIFYING VOICES IN EDUCATION — $5,000 · EducationAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureCHILMARK TOWN AFFAIRS COUNCIL INC — $5,000 · Public BenefitAll Star Code Inc — $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$264,567Philanthropy$125,000Community Improvement$103,000Education$13,000Arts & Culture$10,000Public Benefit$5,000Youth Development$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE COUNCIL OF URBAN PROFESSIONALS INSTITUTE — $103,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetINSPIRE ACCESS — $100,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBLACK ECONOMIC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEUPHEMIA L HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILMARK TOWN AFFAIRS COUNCIL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAll Star Code Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPAVE INC DBA PARENTS AMPLIFYING VOICES IN EDUCATION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COUNCIL OF URBAN PROFESSIONALS INSTITUTE
  • Who funds INSPIRE ACCESS
  • Who funds BLACK ECONOMIC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds APOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds EUPHEMIA L HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds CHILMARK TOWN AFFAIRS COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds All Star Code Inc
  • Who funds PAVE INC DBA PARENTS AMPLIFYING VOICES IN EDUCATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Imb Foundation Dba the Richardson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph