Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ima Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$831k
Granted FY2025still arriving
602
Grants FY2025still arriving
42
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$1.0MHuman Services$943kYouth Development$826kHealth$494kArts & Culture$408kCommunity Improvement$235kInternational$216kPhilanthropy$190kOther$0
02FY2025 · 602 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k569 grants · $445k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $387k
$440
Median grant
42
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIMPLY HYGIENE INC$27,500
METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DE$22,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS KANSAS CIT$20,110
IMA FINANCIAL GROUP INC ASSOCIATE$16,581
LIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC$15,000
MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC$11,580
STARLIGHT THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF KA$11,266
SOUND$11,000
CASA OF LANE COUNTY$10,550
HIGHVIEW$10,500
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC$10,100
FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY$10,000
WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION$10,000
HOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION$10,000
MOXXIE NETWORK FOUNDATION INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $832k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNT: $5k → 10%CHILDRENS FUND: $8k → 14%CLOTHING INC: $15k → 19%EMBERHOPE INC: $10k → 9%BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE: $7k → 21%FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC: $11k → 10%CASA PACIFICA CENTERS FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 10%WISEPLACE: $10k → 10%CLOTHING INC: $14k → 19%LEAD TO READ INC: $5k → 8%CLOTHING INC: $10k → 19%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY INC: $8k → 15%LAURAS HOUSE: $10k → 10%CLOTHING INC: $10k → 19%LOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 15%RAINBOW KITCHEN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 11%HOPESPARKS: $10k → 9%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE: $8k → 15%LOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 15%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDRENS FOUNDATION A CORP: $10k → 14%CHELSEA PIERS FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDRENS FOUNDATION A: $10k → 14%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $10k → 16%LYTE COLLECTIVE: $10k → 14%EMPOWER EVERGREEN: $10k → 16%PARA LOS NINOS: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC: $29k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INCORPORATED: $19k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INCORPORATED: $19k → 14%EAGLES NEST COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $10k → 9%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $8k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER WICHITA: $28k → 16%KANDELIA: $10k → 9%RAINBOWS UNITED INC: $35k → 16%PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS: $10k → 14%ABILITYFIRST: $5k → 14%THE PANDO INITIATIVE INC: $20k → 16%THE PANDO INITIATIVE INC: $10k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $10k → 16%ACTIVATEWORK INC: $10k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE INC: $24k → 12%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $28k → 16%WARREN VILLAGE INC: $15k → 12%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $16k → 16%WARREN VILLAGE INC: $14k → 12%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $7k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $7k → 16%SIMPLY HYGIENE INC: $28k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 491 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

491 repeat relationships: 262 still active in FY2025, 229 since wound down; 322 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

491
711

Total granted

$3.8M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+4%

Still filing today

80%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $292k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationAnimalsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COUNCIL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $160k · revenue +24%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $74k · revenue +48%
  • TW
    THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME
    5× · 2021–2025 · $59k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • VG
    VARIOUS GRANTS
    one grant, 2022 · $94k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS KC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
2
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
3
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
4
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
5
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
6
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
7
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
8
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
9
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
10
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Young Americans Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

1180 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1180 of the 1,545 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
158
Early backer (in before they grew)
1163/1180
Grantees still filing
623/1180
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COUNCIL FOUNDATION: $160,000 · OtherTHE COUNCIL FOUNDATIONVARIOUS GRANTS: $94,387 · OtherBIG BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $71,650 · OtherMETROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DE: $62,500 · Other+92 more: $1,431,165 · Other+92 moreJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $73,600 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SER…THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $58,629 · Human ServicesTHE WICHITA CHILD…WARREN VILLAGE INC: $57,170 · Human ServicesWARREN VILLAGE IN…CLOTHING INC: $50,180 · Human ServicesCLOTHING INCTHE PANDO INITIATIVE INC: $41,088 · Human ServicesTHE PANDO INITIAT…LOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $40,000 · Human ServicesLOOKING GLASS COM…RAINBOWS UNITED INC: $35,050 · Human ServicesRAINBOWS UNITED I…SIMPLY HYGIENE INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesSIMPLY HYGIENE IN…FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER WICHITA: $31,600 · Human Services+21 more: $232,455 · Human Services+21 moreWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationWICHITA STATE UNI…CRISTO REY DALLAS HIGH SCHOOL INC: $50,000 · EducationCRISTO REY DALLAS…ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $48,000 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CHOI…The Kansas University Endowment Association: $40,750 · EducationThe Kansas Univer…DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $40,268 · EducationDENVER SCHOLARSHI…NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $39,500 · EducationNEWMAN UNIVERSITY…THE ATTAINMENT NETWORK: $30,000 · EducationFriends University: $30,000 · EducationMETROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INC: $21,840 · Education+21 more: $263,991 · Education+21 moreKEN GARFF FOR GOOD: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentKEN GARFF…GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER: $30,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INC…TRANSITION ZONE INC: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentTRANSITIO…MISSION SQUASH OF HOUSTON: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentMISSION S…HIGHVIEW: $25,525 · Youth DevelopmentHIGHVIEWBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTH…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF EMERALD VALLEY: $20,210 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND …SIMS-FAYOLA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentSIMS-FAYO…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTH…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS COLUMBIA NORTHW: $19,127 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTH…C5 Youth Foundation of Texas Inc: $12,500 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP FIRE ALASKA: $12,232 · Youth DevelopmentFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE: $12,000 · Youth Development+4 more: $40,000 · Youth Development+4 moreDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $52,500 · Arts & CulturePaper Mill Playhouse: $40,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $40,000 · Arts & CultureSTARLIGHT THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureWichita Art Museum Inc: $22,500 · Arts & CultureHope Stone Inc: $10,401 · Arts & CultureTHE NEW 42ND STREET INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTURNING POINT CENTER FOR FAMILIES: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePLATTEFORUM: $10,000 · Arts & CultureKAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureEugene Symphony Association Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureJUDI'S HOUSE INC: $51,333 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC: $44,522 · PhilanthropyMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $36,228 · PhilanthropyDENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $31,608 · PhilanthropyGOLD CROWN FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,400 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR BETTER SCHOOLS: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS INC: $71,510 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC: $57,500 · InternationalJunior Achievement of Utah & Idaho: $30,000 · InternationalBUILDING YOUTH AROUND THE WORLD: $10,880 · InternationalGIVING CHILDREN HOPE: $10,000 · InternationalBUILDON INC: $10,000 · International
Other$1,819,702Human Services$654,772Education$624,349Youth Development$337,094Arts & Culture$267,901Philanthropy$236,091International$189,890

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COUNCIL FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $73,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS INC: $71,510 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $58,629 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC: $57,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWARREN VILLAGE INC: $57,170 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $52,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJUDI'S HOUSE INC: $51,333 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCLOTHING INC: $50,180 over 5y, 17% of budgetCRISTO REY DALLAS HIGH SCHOOL INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $48,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $45,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC: $44,522 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF LANE COUNTY: $42,576 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE PANDO INITIATIVE INC: $41,088 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $40,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC: $40,450 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $40,268 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Kansas City: $40,261 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDCAREGROUP: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPaper Mill Playhouse: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKEN GARFF FOR GOOD: $40,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $39,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $36,228 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOWS UNITED INC: $35,050 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSIMPLY HYGIENE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado: $32,970 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON INC: $32,600 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $31,608 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER WICHITA: $31,600 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetURBAN PEAK DENVER: $30,821 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER: $30,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $30,320 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ATTAINMENT NETWORK: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSTARLIGHT THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJunior Achievement of Utah & Idaho: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFriends University: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSITION ZONE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetMISSION SQUASH OF HOUSTON: $30,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCOLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION: $28,225 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHIGHVIEW: $25,525 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetLIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC: $25,375 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $24,149 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable FoundationKS74.7× affinity40 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Wichita Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Kansas Health Foundation · Belin Foundation · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Denver Broncos Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Bruce G Cochener Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ima Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ima Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Relief Nursery Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Looking Glass Community Services: 18% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Clubs of Emerald Valley: 15% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Forests Today and Forever: 10% of income from government
  • Paper Mill Playhouse: 9% of income from government
  • St Vincent De Paul Society of Lane County Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Eugene Symphony Association Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Intempo Organization Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Jasper Mountain: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon Symphony Association: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
84report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1545 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ima’s filings →

More from the funding graph