Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Im L F & C Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$295k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2025
11
Organizations funded FY2024
45%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 11
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$1.7M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 45% of the organizations Im L F & C Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 18% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsEnvironmentHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving9$295k11%
FY202411$220k45%
FY20235$186k60%
FY20224$180k50%
FY20211$125k100%
FY20202$30k50%
FY20198$16kn/a
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$526kEnvironment$165kHuman Services$115kReligion$84kHousing & Shelter$38kArts & Culture$26kCivil Rights$11kHealth$9kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 15 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($117k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Im L F & C Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrinity Episcopal School: $266,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetUp Rva: $205,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetChesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: $165,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Richmond (6769): $115,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSt Andrew's School: $51,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetGrace and Holy Trinity Endowment Fund Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetBetter Housing Coalition: $37,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Richmond Ballet: $25,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetZebra Youth Inc: $8,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOutmemphis: $8,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMedical College of Va Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAdvocates for Trans Equality Education Fund: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrevor Project Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLewis Ginter Botanical Garden Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaymont Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tesco FoundationVA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tesco Foundation · Herndon Foundation · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Hamilton Family Foundation Charitable Trust · The William G Reynolds Jr Charitable Foundation · Windsor Fdn Trust Uw Quincy Cole · Estes Foundation Co Matthew Breidenbach Pitcairn · Wilbur Moreland Havens Charitable Foundation · Marie G Dennett Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Im L F & C Foundation with peer funders

About Im L F & C Foundation

How much does Im L F & C Foundation give?
Im L F & C Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $294,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 11 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does Im L F & C Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (50%), Environment (16%), Human Services (11%).
Who are Im L F & C Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Trinity Episcopal School ($266k), Up Rva ($205k), Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc ($165k).
Does Im L F & C Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 45% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Im L F & C Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Im L F & C Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Tesco Foundation, Herndon Foundation, Richard S Reynolds Foundation.
Where is Im L F & C Foundation based?
Im L F & C Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Im L F & C’s filings →

More from the funding graph