Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Illinois Bar Foundation

The mission of the Illinois Bar Foundation is to ensure meaningful access to the justice system, especially for those with limited means, and to assist lawyers who can no longer support themselves due to incapacity.

$611k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Crime & Legal$1.4MHousing & Shelter$30kEmployment$14kCivil Rights$8kEducation$8kInternational$8k
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 33 grants below total $329,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $611,107 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $282,107 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $142k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $188k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Prairie State Legal Services$20,000
Land of Lincoln Legal Assistance Foundation$20,000
Public Interest Law Initiative$20,000
Illinois Legal Aid Online$20,000
CARPLS$12,500
Chicago Volunteer Legal Services$12,500
Ascend Justice$12,500
Pro Bono Network$10,000
Immigration Project$10,000
Center for Disability & Elder Law$10,000
Uptown People Law Center$10,000
James B Moran Center for Youth Academy$10,000
Migrant and Community Action Project$10,000
National Immigrant Justice Center$10,000
Chicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Migrant and Community Action Project: $10k → 21%Migrant and Community Action Project: $8k → 21%CARPLS: $13k → 14%CARPLS: $10k → 14%CARPLS: $10k → 14%CARPLS: $10k → 14%CARPLS: $10k → 14%CARPLS: $10k → 14%CARPLS: $10k → 14%CARPLS: $10k → 14%CARPLS: $10k → 14%Beyond Legal Aid: $8k → 14%The Village Legal and Community Project: $8k → 14%Chicago Advocate Legal NFP: $8k → 14%Legal Aid Society of Metropolitan Family Services: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 21 repeat orgs$126k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
2

Total granted

$1.3M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+16%

Still filing today

90%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEducationCivil RightsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    Public Interest Law Initiative
    9× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +114%
  • LO
    LAND OF LINCOLN LEGAL AID INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $158k · revenue +66%
  • PS
    PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $158k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • EF
    EQUIP FOR EQUALITY
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +16%
  • TF
    The Family Defense Center
    one grant, 2019 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Legal Aid Chicago

At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…

Crime & Legal
2
Greater Chicago Legal Clinic

The organization provides community based legal services and education to the under-served and disadvantaged in Chicago metropolitan areas.

Crime & Legal
3
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
4
First Defense Legal Aid

First Defense Legal Aid mobilizes lawyers and community members to fill gaps in public defense and create, protect, and engage replicable alternatives to the criminal system, starting with its entry points.

Crime & Legal
5
Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc

To provide transformative legal services that enable diverse communities in East Palo Alto and beyond to achieve a secure and thriving future.

Crime & Legal
6
Chicago Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Inc

Secure racial equity and economic opportunity for all

Crime & Legal
7
Centro Legal Por Derechos Humanos Inc

Provide low and no cost legal representation, consultation, and education to people with low incomes.

Crime & Legal
8
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
9
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.

—
10
Michigan Advocacy Program

To advance the safety, independence, and economic stability of those most affected by poverty, racism, and other structurally oppressive systems by increasing access to justice and working for systemic solutions.

Crime & Legal
11
Inner City Law Center

In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.

Crime & Legal
12
Legal Aid Justice Center

The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Suburban Legal Aid Clinic and the most unlike its peers is World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%6%<5yr14%6%5–10yr18%21%10–20yr17%15%20–35yr14%39%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr18%5%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr14%65%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
16%
5,316/34,118

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
20/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Public Interest Law Initiative — $177,500 · Crime & LegalPublic Interest Law InitiativeLAND OF LINCOLN LEGAL AID INC — $157,500 · Crime & LegalLAND OF LINCOLN LEGAL AID INCPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC — $157,500 · Crime & LegalPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INCILLINOIS LEGAL AID ONLINE — $140,000 · Crime & LegalILLINOIS LEGAL AID ONLINECABRINI GREEN LEGAL AID — $70,000 · Crime & LegalCABRINI GREEN LEGAL AIDLaw Center for Better Housing — $53,000 · Crime & LegalLaw Center for Better HousingJAMES B MORAN CENTER FOR YOUTH ADVOCACY — $40,000 · Crime & Legal+5 more — $54,500 · Crime & Legal+5 moreCHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION — $95,000 · OtherCHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERV…ASCEND JUSTICE — $62,500 · OtherASCEND JUSTICEHeartland Alliance for Human Needs and Rights — $62,500 · OtherHeartland Alliance for Human…Legal Council for Health Justice — $30,000 · OtherLegal Council for Health Jus…Domestic Violence Legal Clinic — $30,000 · OtherDomestic Violence Legal Clin…UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE — $17,500 · OtherCenter for Disability & Elder Law Inc — $17,500 · OtherUptown People's Law Center — $17,500 · Other+4 more — $28,000 · Other+4 moreCOORDINATED ADVICE & REFERRAL PROGRAM FOR LEGAL SERVICES — $92,500 · Human ServicesCOORDINATED…Migrant and Immigrant Community Action Project — $17,500 · Human ServicesMigrant and…CHICAGO ADVOCATE LEGAL NFP — $7,500 · Human ServicesGREENLIGHT FAMILY SERVICES — $7,500 · Human ServicesBEYOND LEGAL AID — $7,500 · Human ServicesThe Village Legal and Community Project — $7,500 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family Services — $7,500 · Human ServicesPRO BONO NETWORK — $32,500 · Public BenefitNORTHERN ILLINOIS JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS — $7,500 · Public BenefitChicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation — $15,500 · Civil RightsWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $15,000 · InternationalChicago Workers' Collaborative NFP — $7,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · Education
Crime & Legal$850,000Other$360,500Human Services$147,500Public Benefit$40,000Civil Rights$15,500International$15,000Education$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPublic Interest Law Initiative — $177,500 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetLAND OF LINCOLN LEGAL AID INC — $157,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC — $157,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS LEGAL AID ONLINE — $140,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetCHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION — $95,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCOORDINATED ADVICE & REFERRAL PROGRAM FOR LEGAL SERVICES — $92,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCABRINI GREEN LEGAL AID — $70,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetASCEND JUSTICE — $62,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHeartland Alliance for Human Needs and Rights — $62,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLaw Center for Better Housing — $53,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetJAMES B MORAN CENTER FOR YOUTH ADVOCACY — $40,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPRO BONO NETWORK — $32,500 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetLegal Council for Health Justice — $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMigrant and Immigrant Community Action Project — $17,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCenter for Disability & Elder Law Inc — $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUptown People's Law Center — $17,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetIMMIGRATION PROJECT INC — $17,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetChicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation — $15,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLIFE-SPAN — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO ADVOCATE LEGAL NFP — $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEQUIP FOR EQUALITY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREENLIGHT FAMILY SERVICES — $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEQUITY LEGAL SERVICES INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBEYOND LEGAL AID — $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Village Legal and Community Project — $7,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION LEGAL — $7,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lawyers Trust Fund of…Illinois Equal Justic…The Chicago Bar Found…Polk Bros Foundation …Public Interest Law I…The Sidley Austin Fou…Equal Justice WorksChicago Foundation fo…The Chicago Community…The Resurrection Proj…United Way of Metropo…Circle of Service Fou…
Lawyers Trust Fund of IllinoisIL62.3× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lawyers Trust Fund of Illinois · Illinois Equal Justice Foundation · The Chicago Bar Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Public Interest Law Initiative · The Sidley Austin Foundation · Equal Justice Works · Chicago Foundation for Women · The Chicago Community Trust · The Resurrection Project · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Circle of Service Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Illinois Bar Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines