Skip to content

· Private foundation

Il Cohen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$283k
Granted FY2025still arriving
69
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$149kEnvironment$146kCivil Rights$131kFood & Nutrition$125kInternational$112kHealth$96kEducation$52kHuman Services$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 69 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k60 grants · $191k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $92k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION$12,000
EARTH JUSTICE$10,325
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$10,000
AFMDA$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
EWG$10,000
PASADENA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
PEER$10,000
PROPUBLICA$7,500
ORCAS MEALS ON WHEELS$5,200
MEMRI$5,000
ORCAS FOOD BANK$5,000
NRDC$5,000
NATIONAL PARKS & CONSERVATION ASSOC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNFLOWER OF PEACE: $1k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $3k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
AR
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$954k · 74 repeat orgs$510k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

74 repeat relationships: 48 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
119

Total granted

$954k
$435k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+13%

Still filing today

15%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalCivil RightsArts & CultureFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $22k · revenue +48%
  • Feeding America
    4× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +23%
  • MM
    MINDS MATTER OF SEATTLE INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $12k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • SC
    SUPPORT CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCATES
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • PE
    PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +89%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
7
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
11
Ceres Inc

Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…

Environment
12
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grassroots International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Orcas Open Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 215 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/66
Grantees still filing
41/66
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACLU FOUNDATION: $47,500 · Other+163 more: $1,207,975 · Other+163 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $22,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $10,000 · Civil RightsOXFAM AMERICA ACTION FUND INC: $4,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $4,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $3,500 · Civil RightsPUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE: $10,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $6,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $4,000 · EnvironmentMONARCH BUTTERFLY FUND: $2,500 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $1,500 · EnvironmentMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $1,500 · Environment+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentNORTHWEST INDIAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $22,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $6,000 · EducationNORTHWEST INDIAN COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,000 · InternationalHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 · InternationalGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,000 · InternationalTEACHING FOR CHANGE: $3,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $3,000 · InternationalMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 · International+2 more: $2,000 · InternationalFeeding America: $13,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance: $9,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $4,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY INVOLVED IN SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE INC: $2,500 · Food & NutritionALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $12,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $4,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $4,000 · Health
Other$1,255,475Civil Rights$53,500Environment$42,500Education$35,500International$34,500Food & Nutrition$28,500Health$20,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $22,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMINDS MATTER OF SEATTLE INC: $12,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSupport Center for Child Advocates: $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPLASTIC ANEMIA & MDS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPAL COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM AMERICA ACTION FUND INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMINDS MATTER OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $4,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSURVIVAL CENTERS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORCAS ISLAND FOOD BANK: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEACHING FOR CHANGE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF WMASS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWEST INDIAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MINDS MATTER OF SEATTLE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Support Center for Child Advocates ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA15× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Lorber Foundation · Orcas Island Community Foundation · The Beveridge Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Il Cohen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Il Cohen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Urban League of Greater Springfield Inc: 81% of income from government
  • Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Survival Centers Inc: 9% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 215 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Il Cohen’s filings →

More from the funding graph