· Public charity
Idonate Charitable Foundation
IDONATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION exists to provide people with a simple way to give.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $347,143 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $382,265 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $35,122 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $185k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $137k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOZO COALITION | $80,194 |
| BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE | $56,375 |
| SOJOURN CHURCH MARIETTA | $37,080 |
| CAMPUS OUTREACH BIRMINGHAM | $32,027 |
| CEDAR RIDGE BAPTIST CHURCH | $20,840 |
| CAMPUS OUTREACH SERVE | $18,434 |
| LIGHTHOUSE HARBOR CHURCH | $17,318 |
| TURNING POINT FOR GOD | $15,751 |
| LOVE BAPTIST CHURCH | $12,138 |
| NEIGHBORS INC | $10,752 |
| BLESSINGS OF HOPE | $10,278 |
| CHRISTIANITY EXPLORED USA | $10,230 |
| CONNIE MAXWELL CHILDREN'S MINISTRIES | $9,861 |
| WIPHAN CARE MINISTRIES INC | $8,158 |
| CLAPHAM SCHOOL | $7,707 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE3× · 2021–2023 · $194k · revenue +83%
- SCSOZO Coalition5× · 2019–2024 · $184k · revenue +87%
- RARAINIER ATHLETES4× · 2019–2023 · $144k · revenue +229%
Funded once
- AVAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC2× · 2019–2020 · $249k · revenue +21%
- NCNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INCgraduated2× · 2019–2020 · $45k · revenue ×103
- IJINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $39k · revenue +48%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.
To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.
Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.
To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.
Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.
Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.
Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connie Maxwell Children's Ministries and the most unlike its peers is The Mba Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE ↗
- Who funds AMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds SOZO Coalition ↗
- Who funds RAINIER ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds GRIP OUTREACH FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds CAMPUS OUTREACH SERVE INC ↗
- Who funds BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds HOOSIER CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
- Who funds LIFE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
- Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MOSAIC HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds HOWTOLIFE MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds THE WELLHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Andrew Wommack Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds CLAPHAM SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CEDAR RIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds Connie Maxwell Children's Ministries ↗
- Who funds WIPHAN CARE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds REFLECTIONS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds NEW PATHWAYS TO ENTERPRISE INC ↗
- Who funds Turning Point for God ↗
- Who funds LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · South Carolina Christian Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Impact Investing Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Idonate Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.