· Public charity
Idaho Womens Charitable Foundation
Idaho women's charitable foundation (iwcf) educates members about community needs and inspires them to positively impact the community through educated philanthropy.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of IDAHO WOMENS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k17 grants · $262k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $114k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRANTS OF 5000 OR LESS | $114,000 |
| FRIENDS OF WEISER RIVER TRAIL | $28,000 |
| JESSE TREE OF IDAHO | $23,250 |
| VALOR HEALTH | $21,013 |
| FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES | $20,721 |
| MCCALL PUBLIC LIBRARY | $15,750 |
| THE SHEPHERD'S HOME | $15,000 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA | $15,000 |
| ROLLING TOMATO | $15,000 |
| LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES | $15,000 |
| BOISE VERTICAL FARM INC | $15,000 |
| ARTISANS FOR HOPE | $13,400 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA COUNTY | $12,500 |
| WEISER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
| LIFE'S KITCHEN | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $357k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 16% of Idaho Womens Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in ID; read by stated purpose it is 87% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $216k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TJTHE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC4× · 2021–2025 · $73k · revenue +16%
- BCBOISE CONTEMPORARY THEATER INC4× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +112%
- JIJANNUS INC3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- GLGrants less than 5000 dollarsone grant, 2019 · $219k
- GLGrants less than 5000 dollars andone grant, 2020 · $209k
- GLGrants less than 5001 dollarsone grant, 2021 · $206k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help feed, educate and advocate for Idaho's hungry through collaborative partnerships to develop efficient solutions that strengthen individuals, families, and communities.
Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education
To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.
IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.
The Boise Farmers Market supports a regenerative, healthy food and agricultural system by operating a vibrant marketplace featuring locally grown and crafted products.
Icl's mission is to create a conservation community and pragmatic, enduring solutions that protect and restore the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the land and wildlife you love.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Council of Idaho Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Morrison Knudsen Nature Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds BOISE CONTEMPORARY THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds JANNUS INC ↗
- Who funds GLENNS FERRY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY ↗
- Who funds BOISE VERTICAL FARM INC ↗
- Who funds Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children ↗
- Who funds Family Health Services Corporation ↗
- Who funds Lutheran Community Services Northwest ↗
- Who funds OPERA IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL SW ID SW ID DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERDS HOME INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING INDEPENDENCE NETWORK COPORATION ↗
- Who funds STEP AHEAD IDAHO ↗
- Who funds Idaho Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds ROCK ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL LOUNGE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds WILDERNESS SCIENCE EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds BUILDING HOPE TODAY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF WEISER RIVER TRAIL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds BOISE BICYCLE PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · El& Bg Lightfoot Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · United Way of Treasure Valley Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Idaho Womens Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.