Skip to content
Idaho Womens Charitable Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Idaho Womens Charitable Foundation

Idaho women's charitable foundation (iwcf) educates members about community needs and inspires them to positively impact the community through educated philanthropy.

$376k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$114k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$874kCivil Rights$459kEnvironment$386kHealth$321kHuman Services$312kCommunity Improvement$281kEducation$257kRecreation & Sports$219kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k17 grants · $262k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $114k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRANTS OF 5000 OR LESS$114,000
FRIENDS OF WEISER RIVER TRAIL$28,000
JESSE TREE OF IDAHO$23,250
VALOR HEALTH$21,013
FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES$20,721
MCCALL PUBLIC LIBRARY$15,750
TEACH FOR AMERICA$15,000
ROLLING TOMATO$15,000
BOISE VERTICAL FARM INC$15,000
THE SHEPHERD'S HOME$15,000
LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES$15,000
ARTISANS FOR HOPE$13,400
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA COUNTY$12,500
WEISER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$12,000
LIFE'S KITCHEN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $357k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 9%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO: $14k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA COUNTY: $13k → 8%Community Council of Idaho: $14k → 11%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA COUNTY: $13k → 8%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $23k → 8%THE SHEPHERD'S HOME: $15k → 8%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $20k → 8%Jannus Inc: $15k → 8%Jannus Inc: $15k → 8%Jannus Inc: $15k → 8%Jannus Inc: $15k → 8%ARTISANS FOR HOPE: $13k → 8%NAMI Idaho: $12k → 8%Society of St Vincent de Paul: $23k → 8%BOISE VERTICAL FARM INC: $15k → 8%St Vincent de Paul Southwest Idaho Council: $8k → 8%THE SHEPHERD'S HOME: $15k → 8%Living Independent Network Corp: $15k → 8%Living Independence Network Corp (LINC): $15k → 8%Jesse Tree: $15k → 8%Jesse Tree: $15k → 8%Lutheran Community Services NW: $13k → 8%Lutheran Community Services NW: $13k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Idaho Womens Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in ID; by stated purpose, 87%.

Idaho Womens Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 43 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
26

Total granted

$1.8M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+3%

Still filing today

81%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $216k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthEnvironmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $73k · revenue +16%
  • JI
    JANNUS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +63%
  • BC
    BOISE CONTEMPORARY THEATER INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • GL
    Grants less than 5000 dollars
    one grant, 2019 · $219k
  • GL
    Grants less than 5000 dollars and
    one grant, 2020 · $209k
  • GL
    Grants less than 5001 dollars
    one grant, 2021 · $206k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
2
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
3
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
4
Idaho Foodbank Warehouse

To help feed, educate and advocate for Idaho's hungry through collaborative partnerships to develop efficient solutions that strengthen individuals, families, and communities.

Food & Nutrition
5
Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc

Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education

Crime & Legal
6
Idaho Technology Council Inc

To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.

—
7
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
—
8
Building Hope Idaho Inc
Philanthropy
9
Underdogs Boise
Arts & Culture
10
Boise Farmers Market Inc

The Boise Farmers Market supports a regenerative, healthy food and agricultural system by operating a vibrant marketplace featuring locally grown and crafted products.

Community Improvement
11
Idaho Health Data Exchange Inc

IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.

Health
12
Brave Hearts Idaho
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Council of Idaho Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Morrison Knudsen Nature Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/56
Grantees still filing
39/56
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Grants less than 5000: $390,350 · OtherGrants less than 5000Grants less than 5000 dollars: $219,200 · OtherGrants less than 5000 dollarsGrants less than 5000 dollars and: $208,800 · OtherGrants less than 5000 dollars andGrants less than 5001 dollars: $206,428 · OtherGrants less than 5001 dollarsGrants less than 5001 and: $171,978 · OtherGrants less than 5001 andGrants less than 5001 dollars and: $138,350 · OtherGrants less than 5001 dollars andGRANTS 5000 OR LESS AND INDIVIDUALLY DIRECTED GRANTS: $127,201 · OtherGRANTS 5000 OR LESS AND INDIVIDUALLY DIRECTED GRANTSGRANTS OF 5000 OR LESS: $114,000 · Other+33 more: $805,273 · Other+33 moreTHE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC: $73,250 · Human ServicesTHE JESSE TRE…JANNUS INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesJANNUS INCBOISE VERTICAL FARM INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesBOISE VERTICA…Lutheran Community Services Northwest: $40,000 · Human ServicesLutheran Comm…LIVING INDEPENDENCE NETWORK COPORATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesLIVING INDEPE…SHEPHERDS HOME INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesSHEPHERDS HOM…SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL SW ID SW ID DISTRICT: $30,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF SA…COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC: $28,470 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY COU…Love Inc of Boise Community Incorporated: $25,000 · Human ServicesLove Inc of B…IDAHO DIAPER BANK INC: $15,000 · Human Services+2 more: $25,150 · Human Services+2 moreGLENNS FERRY HEALTH CENTER INC: $59,642 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY: $56,000 · HealthFamily Health Services Corporation: $50,721 · HealthWALTER KNOX MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $21,013 · HealthChildrens Free Dental Clinic Inc: $7,500 · HealthIdaho Association for the Education of Young Children: $51,981 · EducationSTEP AHEAD IDAHO: $30,000 · EducationLEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC: $25,000 · EducationLIFES KITCHEN INC: $20,000 · EducationTeach for America Inc: $15,000 · EducationBOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · EducationBOISE CONTEMPORARY THEATER INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA IDAHO INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureGLOBAL LOUNGE INCORPORATED: $30,000 · Arts & CultureROCK ON WHEELS: $30,000 · Arts & CultureWILDERNESS SCIENCE EDUCATION INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF WEISER RIVER TRAIL INC: $28,000 · EnvironmentFriends of Morrison Knudsen Nature Center: $25,000 · EnvironmentIDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $20,335 · EnvironmentSnake River Waterkeeper Inc: $20,000 · EnvironmentUNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC: $28,600 · PhilanthropyBOISE BICYCLE PROJECT INC: $27,500 · PhilanthropyWEISER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $24,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,381,580Human Services$411,870Health$194,876Education$156,981Arts & Culture$150,000Environment$123,335Philanthropy$80,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC: $73,250 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetJANNUS INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBOISE CONTEMPORARY THEATER INC: $60,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetGLENNS FERRY HEALTH CENTER INC: $59,642 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY: $56,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOISE VERTICAL FARM INC: $55,000 over 2y, 87% of budgetIdaho Association for the Education of Young Children: $51,981 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFamily Health Services Corporation: $50,721 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLutheran Community Services Northwest: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEP AHEAD IDAHO: $30,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetOPERA IDAHO INC: $30,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetGLOBAL LOUNGE INCORPORATED: $30,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetROCK ON WHEELS: $30,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetIdaho Humane Society Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING INDEPENDENCE NETWORK COPORATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL: $30,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetINTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC: $30,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSHEPHERDS HOME INC: $30,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetSOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL SW ID SW ID DISTRICT: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBUILDING HOPE TODAY INC: $29,834 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC: $28,600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC: $28,470 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF WEISER RIVER TRAIL INC: $28,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $27,960 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOISE BICYCLE PROJECT INC: $27,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetLEARNING LAB INC: $27,275 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMCCALL MUSIC SOCIETY INC: $26,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetIDAHO STEM ACTION CENTER FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $26,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLove Inc of Boise Community Incorporated: $25,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetWASSMUTH CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS HOME OF THE ANNE FRANK MEMORIAL: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFriends of Morrison Knudsen Nature Center: $25,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetLEAP CHARITIES INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWEISER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTREASURE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $23,354 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetIDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $20,335 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetIdaho Trails Association: $20,305 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBreaking Chains Academy of Development Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetSnake River Waterkeeper Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetLIFES KITCHEN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRolling Tomato: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWEST CENTRAL HIGHLANDS RC&D INC: $15,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetARTISANS4HOPE: $13,400 over 1y, 18% of budgetNAMI IDAHO: $11,750 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Found…Laura Moore Cunningha…St Luke's Health Syst…Claude R & Ethel B Wh…Idaho Power Foundatio…Lamb Weston Charitabl…The Julius C Jeker Fo…Blue Cross of Idaho F…El& Bg Lightfoot Foun…First Interstate Banc…Simplot Company Found…United Way of Treasur…
Idaho Community Foundation IncID74× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · El& Bg Lightfoot Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · United Way of Treasure Valley Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Idaho Womens Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Idaho Womens Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Idaho Womens’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home