Loading…
· Private foundation
IDAHO ELKS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL INC
TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO REHABILITATION PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS THAT ENHANCE THE LIVES OF REHAB PATIENTS.
$2.3M
Granted FY2024
4
Grants
1
Communities
$2.2M
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Health$17MHuman Services$10kEducation$10kPublic Benefit$7kOther$358k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
paid
2021
healthcare
2022
management deliverydelivery healthcare
2023
—
2024
health
2025
luke's health
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $250k+1 grant · $2.2M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$74M
Total assets
Largest grants
- ST LUKE'S HEALTH SYSTEM$2,225,582
- IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
- RISING STATRS THEREAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$8,025
- BONNER GENERAL HEALTH$7,500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17M · 5 repeat orgs$351k to everyone else
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
10
Total granted
$17M
$343k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+51%
+75%
Still filing today
40%
60%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthEducationPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLST LUKE'S HEALTH SYSTEM LTD7× · 2018–2024 · $16M · revenue +51%
- VVVALLEY VISTA CARE CORPORATION3× · 2020–2022 · $484k · revenue -9%
- BGBONNER GENERAL HEALTH2× · 2023–2024 · $23k
Funded once
- FCFRANKLIN COUNTY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $265k
- TETHE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETYone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +1%
- BGBONNER GENERAL HEALTH & HOSPITALone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
St Luke's Nampa Medical Center Ltd
Provide healthcare services to the community.
Health
2
St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd
Provide healthcare services to the community.
Health
3
Glendive Medical Center
Committed to caring, healing, and a healthier community through the procurement of health services.
Health
4
Valley Health System
Serving our community by improving health. provision of healthcare and medical services.
Health
5
Saint Lukes East Hospital
Hospital
Health
6
Bozeman Health Deaconess Hospital
To improve community health and quality of life for residents and visitors of Southwest Montana.
Health
7
St Luke's Cornwall Hospital
Montefiore st. luke's cornwall hospital is dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare to improve the lives and well-being of the people in the communities we serve.
Health
8
Lehigh Valley Hospital
Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.
Health
9
Sutter Valley Hospitals
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
Health
10
Falls Community Hospital & Clinic Inc
Providing quality care in inpatient and outpatient services, emergency services, rural health clinic and ancillary services.
Health
11
Fairview Health Services
Fairview is driven to heal, discover and educate for longer, healthier lives.
Health
12
Renown Health
To establish, equip and maintain one or more general acute care hospitals and medical centers.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bmh Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$16,986,370Other$357,631Human Services$10,000Education$9,974Public Benefit$6,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST LUKE'S HEALTH SYSTEM LTD ↗
- Who funds VALLEY VISTA CARE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BONNER GENERAL HEALTH & HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BINGHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds GRITMAN MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation IDAHO ELKS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: VALLEY VISTA CARE CORPORATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue held over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 820408601 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on VALLEY VISTA CARE CORPORATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Idaho Elks Rehabilitation Hospital Inc?
Find your warmest path to Idaho Elks Rehabilitation Hospital Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines