Skip to content

· Private foundation

Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc

TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO REHABILITATION PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS THAT ENHANCE THE LIVES OF REHAB PATIENTS.

$4.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$24MEducation$29kHuman Services$17k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $235k
  • $250k+2 grants · $4.0M
$85,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$57M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LUKE'S HEALTH FOUNDATION$3,652,000
BONNER GENERAL HEALTH$305,000
MINIDOKA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$150,000
TETON VALLEY HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$85,000
IESDB FOUNDATION$25,500
ST LUKE'S HEALTH SYSTEM$2,500
SYRINGA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,026
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 5 repeat orgs$4.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against +58% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

$19M
$351k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+58%

Still filing today

40%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    St Luke's Health System Ltd
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19M · revenue +96%
  • VV
    VALLEY VISTA CARE CORPORATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $484k · revenue -5%
  • BG
    BONNER GENERAL HEALTH
    3× · 2023–2025 · $328k

Funded once

  • FC
    FRANKLIN COUNTY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $265k
  • BG
    Bonner General Hospital Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • TE
    THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd

To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.

Health
2
St Luke's Nampa Medical Center Ltd

To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
Teton Valley Health Care

To encourage and support a healthier community.

Health
4
Linton Hospital

The mission of Linton Hospital and Clinics is to enhance the health, well-being, and quality of life of the people we serve.

Health
5
St Luke's Wood River Medical Center Ltd

To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.

Health
6
St Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd

To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.

Health
7
St Luke's McCall Ltd

To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.

Health
8
Boulder City Hospital Inc

Boulder City Hospital seeks to continually improve the quality of the care and service to our patients, guests, and physicians. We promote effective and efficient utilization of available resources to ensure long-term financial viability.…

Health
9
Renown Health

Renown Health makes a genuine difference in the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.

Health
10
Salina Regional Health Center Inc

To provide quality health care services in a healing and spiritual environment

Health
11
Boulder Community Health

To provide our community the highest value healthcare in an innovative, patient-centered environment.

Health
12
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center

Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center (LGSHMC), founded in 1875 is one of the earliest hospitals in the Pacific Northwest. LGSHMC provides acute and tertiary care in Portland, OR with 539 licensed beds. LGSHMC provides a…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bmh Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fry Healthcare Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Luke's Health System Ltd: $18,626,055 · HealthSt Luke's Health System LtdSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd: $3,652,000 · HealthSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd+4 more: $512,815 · HealthBONNER GENERAL HEALTH: $327,500 · OtherFRANKLIN COUNTY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $265,000 · OtherMINIDOKA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $150,000 · OtherTETON VALLEY HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $85,000 · Other+7 more: $105,631 · OtherTHE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $10,000 · Human ServicesIdaho State University Foundation Inc: $9,974 · EducationFRY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 · Public BenefitSYRINGA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,026 · Philanthropy
Health$22,790,870Other$933,131Human Services$10,000Education$9,974Public Benefit$6,500Philanthropy$2,026

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSt Luke's Health System Ltd: $18,626,055 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd: $3,652,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetVALLEY VISTA CARE CORPORATION: $484,465 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBonner General Hospital Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIdaho State University Foundation Inc: $9,974 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBMH INC: $9,443 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRITMAN MEDICAL CENTER INC: $8,907 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYRINGA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,026 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds St Luke's Health System Ltd ↗
  • Who funds St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY VISTA CARE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Bonner General Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Idaho State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BMH INC ↗
  • Who funds GRITMAN MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SYRINGA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Power Foundation IncID13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph