Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ida B Wells Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Crime & Legal$6kHousing & Shelter$3kCommunity Improvement$2kEnvironment$2kArts & Culture$2kEducation$2kHuman Services$1kEmployment$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$69k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSE OF REFUGE INC$1,050
NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$1,000
OHIO CITY INC$1,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYINTERRELIGIOUS TASK FORCE$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $1k → 17%NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8k · 3 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +108% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$8k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+108%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Public BenefitCrime & LegalEmploymentHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LW
    LEGAL WORKS INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $4k · revenue +386%
  • NO
    NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS
    2× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +108%
  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • HD
    HOW DO WE SUSTAIN
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • R
    RENOVARE
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • NO
    NORTHEAST OHIO BLACK HEALTH COALITION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
2
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
3
Cleveland Jobs With Justice

To work as a coalition of labor unions, community organzation, and religious community to raise the public awarness of and build campaigns to promote workers rights an social justice issues.

Education
4
Cleveland Mediation Center

Our mission is to promote a just and peaceful community by honoring all people, building their capacity to act, and facilitating opportunities for them to engage in conflict constructively. We continue to fulfill our mission by…

Crime & Legal
5
Ohio Business Leadership Network
6
Neighborhood Progress Inc

Cleveland neighborhood progress is committed to advancing its mission of fostering communities of choice and opportunity. our vision is for all of cleveland's neighborhoods to be attractive, vibrant communities where people from all…

Community Improvement
7
Literary Cleveland

Literary Cleveland assists writers and readers at all stages of development, promotes new and existing literature of the highest quality, and advances Northeast Ohio as a vital center of diverse voices and visions.

Education
8
Urban League of Greater Cleveland

The mission of Urban League of Greater Cleveland, Inc., (the League) is a community-based organization focused on eliminating the racial, economic, and societal barriers that prevent Black Americans and other underrepresented/underserved…

9
Ohio Conference of Community Development Inc

Occd's purpose is to develop, implement and improve federal, state and local programs for community development and to develop and improve the professional standards and practices of all phases of public administration which are related…

10
Ohio Housing Council

To advocate and educate on behalf of our members to increase the quality and supply of affordable housing in the state of ohio, and to provide our members with current legislative awareness, a forum for voicing legislative and programmatic…

Community Improvement
11
Ohio Growth Partnership

To promote the common good and general welfare of ohioans.

12
Ohio Minority Supplier Development Council

To coordinate efforts of corporations in the State of Ohio to increase the amount of purchases of goods and services from minority owned companies; to provide educational, managerial and technical assistance to minority companies.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Cleveland and the most unlike its peers is Americans Making Immigrants Safe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOW DO WE SUSTAIN — $2,000 · OtherHOW DO WE SUSTAINRENOVARE — $2,000 · OtherRENOVAREHOUSE OF REFUGE INC — $1,050 · OtherHOUSE OF REFUGE INCST CLAIR SUPERIOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,000 · OtherST CLAIR SUPERIOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $1,000 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELANDRESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROJECT ST PAUL'S COMM CHURCH — $588 · OtherRESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROJECT ST PAUL'S COMM…LEGAL WORKS INC — $4,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL WORKS INCNORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS — $2,000 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST O…Americans Making Immigrants Safe — $1,000 · Public BenefitAmericans M…GMILUTH CHASODIM (THE HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION) — $1,000 · Public BenefitGMILUTH CHA…CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $1,850 · EducationCASE WESTE…NORTHEAST OHIO BLACK HEALTH COALITION INC — $1,000 · HealthOHIO CITY INCORPORATED — $1,000 · Community ImprovementESPERANZA THREADS INC — $1,000 · Employment
Other$7,638Crime & Legal$4,000Human Services$2,000Public Benefit$2,000Education$1,850Health$1,000Community Improvement$1,000Employment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEGAL WORKS INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $1,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST OHIO BLACK HEALTH COALITION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST CLAIR SUPERIOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOHIO CITY INCORPORATED — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetESPERANZA THREADS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGMILUTH CHASODIM (THE HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION) — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland · Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Community West Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ida B Wells Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ida B Wells Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ida B Wells Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph