Skip to content

· Public charity

I Have a Dream Foundation

The "I have a dream" foundation (IHDF) expands educational opportunities for children living in under-resourced communities by empowering them to achieve higher education and providing them with guaranteed tuition support and equipping them with the skills and knowledge they need to gain entry to and succeed in college and beyond.

$462k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$153k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$859kYouth Development$193k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $39k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $414k
$60,679
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
I Have a Dream - New Jersey$152,500
I Have a Dream - Atlanta$75,000
I Have a Dream - Miami$67,080
I Have a Dream - Milwaukee$60,679
I Have a Dream - Los Angeles$58,573
I Have a Dream - Dallas$38,865
I Have a Dream - Boulder$9,014
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%I Have a Dream - Idaho: $53k → 7%I Have a Dream - Los Angeles: $59k → 14%I Have a Dream - Dallas: $39k → 14%I Have a Dream - Miami: $67k → 15%I Have a Dream - Milwaukee: $61k → 17%I Have a Dream - Atlanta: $75k → 13%I Have a Dream - Boulder: $10k → 12%I Have a Dream - Newark: $163k → 16%I Have a Dream - Idaho: $26k → 7%I Have a Dream - Los Angeles: $36k → 14%I Have a Dream - Miami: $34k → 15%I Have a Dream - Milwaukee: $38k → 17%I Have a Dream - Boulder: $10k → 12%I Have a Dream - New Jersey: $153k → 16%I Have a Dream - Idaho: $16k → 7%I Have a Dream - Los Angeles: $25k → 14%I Have a Dream - Milwaukee: $15k → 17%I Have a Dream - Boulder: $9k → 12%I Have a Dream - Newark: $89k → 16%I Have a Dream - Idaho: $10k → 7%I Have a Dream - Los Angeles: $10k → 14%I Have a Dream - Milwaukee: $7k → 17%I Have a Dream - Boulder: $9k → 12%I Have a Dream - New Jersey: $27k → 16%I Have a Dream - Los Angeles: $9k → 14%I Have a Dream - Milwaukee: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
WI
NJ
CA
CO
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$834k · 5 repeat orgs$218k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$834k
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+35%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IH
    I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - NEW JERSEY INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $431k · revenue +39%
  • IH
    I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - LOS ANGELES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $139k · revenue +95%
  • IH
    I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - MILWAUKEE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $127k · revenue +481%

Funded once

  • FI
    FARWISE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $89k · revenue +35%
  • IH
    I Have a Dream - Idaho
    one grant, 2022 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
I Have a Dream Foundation - New York

The i have a dream foundation strives to remove the barriers that prevent students in low-income communities from having the same opportunities for success as their peers in middle and high-income families. the foundation offers academic…

—
2
I Have a Dream Foundation

The "I have a dream" foundation (IHDF) expands educational opportunities for children living in under-resourced communities by empowering them to achieve higher education and providing them with guaranteed tuition support and equipping…

Crime & Legal
3
I Have a Dream Foundation -Richmond

Youth educational

Youth Development
4
Let Kids Dream
—
5
Dream Foundation Arizona
Employment
6
Realize Your Dream Foundation
Education
7
Dream for Destiny
Human Services
8
Dream On Foundation
Education
9
I Can Dream Center

Ican dream center fuels dreams by empowering youth with special needs, and their families, with the skills to thrive.

Arts & Culture
10
My American Dreams Foundation

Non-profit organization that tells the stories of Dreamers - young immigrants with DACA status - to raise awareness and dispel myths about immigration. The organization holds educational presentations and events while also conducting…

Arts & Culture
11
Big Dreamers United
Philanthropy
12
Ican Dream Foundation Inc

The ican dream foundation strives to expand the educational and social mission of the ican dream center by providing financial backing beyond the means of their public funding, and by fostering long-term community partnerships.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is I Have a Dream Foundation - Dallas; the most unlike its peers is Farwise Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - NEW JERSEY INC: $430,574 · EducationI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - NEW JERSEY INCI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - MILWAUKEE INC: $126,802 · EducationI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - MILWAUKEE INCTHE I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION OF MIAMI INC: $100,745 · EducationTHE I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION OF MIAMI INCFARWISE INC: $88,594 · EducationFARWISE INCI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - ATLANTA: $75,000 · EducationI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - ATLANTAI Have A Dream Foundation Of Boulder County: $37,514 · EducationI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - LOS ANGELES: $138,697 · PhilanthropyI HAVE A DREAM…I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - DALLAS: $38,865 · Youth DevelopmentI Have a Dream - Idaho: $15,588 · Other
Education$859,229Philanthropy$138,697Youth Development$38,865Other$15,588

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - NEW JERSEY INC: $430,574 over 3y, 17% of budgetI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - LOS ANGELES: $138,697 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - MILWAUKEE INC: $126,802 over 4y, 15% of budgetTHE I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION OF MIAMI INC: $100,745 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetFARWISE INC: $88,594 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - ATLANTA: $75,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION - DALLAS: $38,865 over 1y, 12% of budgetI Have A Dream Foundation Of Boulder County: $37,514 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH11.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization I Have a Dream Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from I Have a Dream Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on I Have a Dream’s filings →

    More from the funding graph