Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hyman Jebb Levy Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
58
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$460k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$2.6MInternational$1.0MEducation$881kArts & Culture$213kCivil Rights$200kHealth$120kHuman Services$85kPhilanthropy$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $737k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $412k
  • $250k+1 grant · $460k
$18,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$460,000
SEPHARDIC TEMPLE TIFERETH ISRAEL$100,000
GIMMEL FOUNDATION$97,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ELWYN$65,000
Yeshivat Ohr Chanoch$50,000
American Associates Ben-Gurion Univ$50,000
Stand with US$50,000
Individual grant recipient$43,500
Mesivta of Greater Los Angeles$40,000
YESHIVA KETANA OF LOS ANGELES$36,000
Colel Chabad$30,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL$28,000
Chabad House UCLA$27,000
American Friends of Shehebar Sephar$26,000
Jewish Student Center DBA Chabad US$26,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ELWYN: $65k → 7%CHIMES ISRAEL THRU CHIMES INTERNATI: $5k → 19%Community Security Servise: $5k → 6%ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $20k → 17%ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $10k → 17%ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $10k → 17%ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $10k → 17%ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $10k → 17%ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $10k → 17%ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.7M · 73 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

73 repeat relationships: 50 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
20

Total granted

$7.7M
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+21%

Still filing today

34%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ELWYN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $240k · revenue ×13 · 36% of their budget
  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $225k · revenue +108%
  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $176k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • GC
    GEMILOS CHASODIM CHASDEI MOSHE
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • OS
    Our Space LA Valley Beth Shalom
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
2
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
6
University of Judaism Foundation
—
7
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
8
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
9
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
10
American Friends of Ohev Yisrael

Support for study of torah and chasiddus in ramat shilo, israel

Religion
11
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
12
American Friends of Torat Eliyahu
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yeshivat Hesder Sderotinc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Yeshivat Hameiri Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/39
Grantees still filing
26/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,480,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSEPHARDIC JEWISH COMMUNITY & BROTHERHOOD OF LOS ANGELES: $569,000 · OtherSEPHARDIC JEWISH COMMUNITY & BROTHERHOOD OF LOS ANGELESYESHIVAT OHR CHANOCH INC: $218,667 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $191,500 · Other+66 more: $2,039,134 · Other+66 moreThe Gimmel Foundation Inc: $480,500 · InternationalThe Gimmel …ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $176,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMER…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC: $84,800 · InternationalAMERICAN FR…+2 more: $43,200 · International+2 moreAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $225,000 · EducationYeshiva Ketana of Los Angeles: $163,600 · EducationMESIVTA OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $109,000 · EducationMENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Education+1 more: $17,400 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ELWYN: $240,000 · Human ServicesISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $80,000 · Human ServicesFriends of Ethiopian Jews Inc: $35,000 · Human Services+2 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesOPENDOR MEDIA INC: $121,000 · ReligionTZEDEK AMERICA: $68,000 · ReligionGindi Maimonides Academy: $40,000 · ReligionJEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $32,500 · ReligionMY MORASHA INC: $20,000 · ReligionHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC: $20,000 · ReligionTORAH ACADEMY OF LOS ANGELES: $15,000 · Religion+4 more: $24,550 · ReligionCLARION PROJECT INC: $120,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $60,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER SDEROTINC: $44,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HAMEIRI INC: $31,700 · PhilanthropyTHE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INC: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$5,498,301International$784,500Education$575,000Human Services$365,000Religion$341,050Arts & Culture$260,000Philanthropy$100,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Gimmel Foundation Inc: $480,500 over 8y, 37% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ELWYN: $240,000 over 8y, 36% of budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $225,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $176,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYeshiva Ketana of Los Angeles: $163,600 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetOPENDOR MEDIA INC: $121,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCLARION PROJECT INC: $120,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetMESIVTA OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $109,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC: $84,800 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $80,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $80,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $80,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTZEDEK AMERICA: $68,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetMENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER SDEROTINC: $44,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetHARKHAM-GAON ACADEMY: $41,800 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetFriends of Ethiopian Jews Inc: $35,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $32,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PERUTZ ETZ JACOB HEBREW ACADEMY: $30,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $28,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMY MORASHA INC: $20,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAAGALIM INC: $18,200 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEFESH HACHAIM INC: $17,400 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetONEGENERATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVEN HATORAH OF AVENTURA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCommunity Security Service: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAM YISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHIMES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH REPUBLICAN ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Gimmel Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ELWYN ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Yeshiva Ketana of Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds OPENDOR MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds TZEDEK AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER SDEROTINC ↗
  • Who funds HARKHAM-GAON ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Gindi Maimonides Academy ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA40.6× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc · Goldner Family Foundation Inc · Max Candiotty Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Paul Marciano Foundation · Los Angeles Jewish Fund · The Alon and Rosana Miller Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hyman Jebb Levy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hyman Jebb Levy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hyman Jebb Levy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hyman Jebb Levy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hyman Jebb Levy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph