Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Huseby Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$131kHealth$21kReligion$4kAnimals$2kEducation$200
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$137k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALERIE'S HOUSE INC$5,500
FLORIDA LIONS EYE CLINIC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OPERATION HEALING FORCES: $1k → 13%SENOR CITIZENS AWARENESS NETWORK: $500 → 7%VALERIE'S HOUSE INC: $6k → 11%VALERIE'S HOUSE INC: $5k → 11%VALERIE'S HOUSE INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$151k · 6 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$151k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+18%

Still filing today

83%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VH
    VALERIE'S HOUSE INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $127k · revenue +165%
  • FL
    FLORIDA LIONS EYE CLINC INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +79%
  • VU
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    2× · 2018–2019 · $8k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • BR
    BETHEL ROMANIAN CHURCH OF GOD
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • OH
    OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +18%
  • SH
    SCAN HEALTH PLANgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +81%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
3
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
4
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
5
Scan Group

To support the charitable mission of scan health plan, the scan foundation and its other 501(c)(3) related organizations; other programs, initiatives and partnerships focused on the mission of scan health plan.

Human Services
6
Visiting Nurse Association of Texas

Established in 1934, vna helps older adults live with dignity and independence at home by providing in-home care, food and friendship for the ill, hungry, and homebound.

Health
7
Vna Home Health Services Inc

Vna home health services' mission is to improve the quality of their patients' lives by providing compassionate services that support care, comfort and independence. this is accomplished by coordinating and delivering the services needed…

Health
8
Emanate Health

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
9
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
10
Banner Medical Group

To assist banner health complete its mission, banner medical group (bmg) was created to make health care easier, so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
11
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
Mount Sinai Community Foundation

To improve the health of the community it serves by ensuring the availability of medical, surgical, and primary care physicians and advanced practice providers and high quality healthcare services.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scan Health Plan and the most unlike its peers is Senior Citizens Awareness Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VALERIE'S HOUSE INC — $126,500 · Human ServicesVALERIE'S HOUSE INC+2 more — $1,500 · Human ServicesFLORIDA LIONS EYE CLINC INC — $10,000 · HealthFLORIDA LIONS…Vanderbilt University Medical Center — $7,500 · HealthVanderbilt Un…SCAN HEALTH PLAN — $1,000 · HealthSCAN HEALTH P…LOVING SPIRIT INC — $2,500 · OtherBETHEL ROMANIAN CHURCH OF GOD — $2,500 · OtherAmerican Brain Tumor Association — $2,000 · OtherST MARYS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $1,000 · OtherWEST END COMMUNITY CHURCH — $500 · OtherOLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOG SANTUARY — $500 · Other+1 more — $200 · OtherOLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOGS INC — $2,000 · Animals
Human Services$128,000Health$18,500Other$9,200Animals$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVALERIE'S HOUSE INC — $126,500 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetFLORIDA LIONS EYE CLINC INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOGS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCAN HEALTH PLAN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Huseby Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Valerie's House Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph