Skip to content
Huntington Arts Council Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Huntington Arts Council Inc

To enrich the quality of life of long islanders with programs and services that address the needs and interests of artists, cultural organizations and the community.

$411k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$316kEducation$31kHealth$7k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $158,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $411,400 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $253,400 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $98k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Westbury Arts$10,000
eVoco Voice Collective v$10,000
Teatro Experimental Yerbabruj$10,000
The Art Guild of Port Washing$10,000
Hamptons Take 2-Film Festival$10,000
Dance Visions NY Inc$10,000
Island Symphony Orchestra$7,000
Arts Project of Cherry Grove$7,000
The Jam Session Inc$7,000
NassauPops Symphony Orchestra$7,000
Friends of NSSO$7,000
The Art Center at Duck Creek$7,000
Rites of Spring Music Festiva$7,000
Stage the Change Inc$7,000
Bay Shore Schools Arts Educat$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%LONG BEACH THEATRE GUILD: $5k → 6%Bay Area Friends of Fine Arts: $7k → 7%EASTLINE PLAYERS CORP: $7k → 6%Stage the Change Inc: $7k → 7%Artists in Partnership: $7k → 6%WALT WHITMAN BIRTHPLACE ASSOC: $5k → 7%Circulo Hispanidad: $5k → 6%SAINT-CYR ART STUDIOS: $38k → 7%Dance Visions NY Inc: $10k → 6%THE ART CENTER AT DUCK CREEK: $8k → 7%SYMPHONIC POPS OF LONG ISLAND: $7k → 6%SAINT-CYR ART STUDIOS: $38k → 7%WESTBURY ARTS INC: $12k → 6%The Art Center at Duck Creek: $7k → 7%Westbury Arts: $10k → 6%SAINT-CYR ART STUDIOS: $14k → 7%Westbury Arts Inc: $10k → 6%Hamptons Take 2-Film Festival: $10k → 7%eVoco Voice Collective v: $10k → 6%The Art Guild of Port Washing: $10k → 7%NassauPops Symphony Orchestra: $7k → 6%Rites of Spring Music Festiva: $7k → 7%Friends of NSSO: $7k → 6%Bay Shore Schools Arts Educat: $7k → 7%Eastline Players Corp: $7k → 7%NORTHPORT CHORALE: $6k → 7%NORTHPORT CHORALE: $6k → 7%Teatro Experimental Yerbabruj: $10k → 7%OLA OF EASTERN LI: $9k → 7%The Jam Session Inc: $7k → 7%Islip Arts Council: $6k → 7%The Victor DAmico Institute: $7k → 7%ISLIP ARTS COUNCIL: $5k → 7%Orchestra Long Island: $7k → 7%Island Symphony Orchestra: $7k → 7%SOL Y SOMBRA DANCE CO: $8k → 7%Smithtown Community Band: $7k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159k · 5 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$159k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+10%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $141k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WESTBURY ARTS INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $32k · revenue +60%
  • EP
    EastLine Players Corp
    2× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +28%
  • IA
    ISLIP ARTS COUNCIL INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $11k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • OO
    OLA OF EASTERN LONG ISLAND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +26%
  • TA
    THE ART CENTER AT DUCK CREEK
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • SY
    Sol y Sombra Spanish Dance Co
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hudson Lyric Opera

The Hudson Lyric Opera is an organization dedicated to providing culturalopportunities for talented singers and musicians in the Hudson Valleyregion that have been classically or formally trained who, otherwise, wouldnot be able to devote…

Arts & Culture
2
Chelsea Opera Inc

Chelsea Opera produces live staged performances and concerts of various musical types including opera, classical music and popular jazz, engagingsingers, pianists and instrumentalists, and production staff (stage director, stage manager,…

Arts & Culture
3
Amelia Island Opera Inc

to promote public appreciation of classical vocal music

Arts & Culture
4
Northern Dutchess Symphony Orchestra

Northern Dutchess Symphony Orchestra (NDSO) was formed as a nonprofit organization in 2006 to bring live professional music to the Hudson Valley. Orchestra members include professional musicians and music educators, as well as talented…

Arts & Culture
5
Bronx Opera Company Inc

Performance of opera in staged productions with orchestra and in concert at affordable prices for the Bronx community and other parts of the New York City area

Arts & Culture
6
Southeastern Connecticut Community Orchestra Inc
Arts & Culture
7
New York Baroque Dance Co Inc

Concerts and workshops in 18th century dance.

—
8
New York Opera Society Inc

Nyos is an educational and touring company dedicated to the promotion of classical music through relevant and accessible productions for domestic and international audiences

Arts & Culture
9
String Orchestra of Brooklyn Inc

Music: Arts and Culture

Arts & Culture
10
Grand Island Music Series
Arts & Culture
11
Queens Council On the Arts Inc

Promotion of arts and arts organizations in queens, ny

—
12
West Shore Chorale

Arts Organization

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Islip Arts Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hamptons Take 2 Documentary Film Festival Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
8/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT-CYR ART STUDIOS: $90,250 · OtherSAINT-CYR ART STUDIOSNORTHPORT CHORALE INC: $11,600 · OtherNORTHPORT CHORALE INCDANCE VISIONS NY: $10,000 · OtherTeatro Experimental Yerbabruj: $10,000 · OtherThe Art Guild of Port Washing: $10,000 · OtherTHE ART CENTER AT DUCK CREEK: $7,875 · OtherSol y Sombra Spanish Dance Co: $7,750 · Other+10 more: $64,843 · Other+10 moreWESTBURY ARTS INC: $31,660 · Arts & CultureWESTBURY ARTS INCEastLine Players Corp: $14,250 · Arts & CultureEastLine Players CorpISLIP ARTS COUNCIL INC: $11,160 · Arts & CultureISLIP ARTS COUNCIL INCEVOCO VOICE COLLECTIVE INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureEVOCO VOICE COLLECTIVE INCHAMPTONS TAKE 2 DOCUMENTARY FILM FESTIVAL INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHAMPTONS TAKE 2 DOCUMENTARY FILM FESTIVAL I…OLA OF EASTERN LONG ISLAND INC: $8,750 · Arts & CultureOLA OF EASTERN LONG ISLAND INCVICTOR D'AMICO INSTITUTE OF ART: $7,000 · Arts & CultureARTS CENTER AT DUCK CREEK INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureRITES OF SPRING MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureSTAGE THE CHANGE INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE NORTH SHORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $7,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ARTS PROJECT OF CHERRY GROVE NY INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureLONG ISLAND ORCHESTRA INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureBAY SHORE SCHOOLS ARTS EDUCATION FUND INC: $7,000 · Health
Other$212,318Arts & Culture$134,820Health$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTBURY ARTS INC: $31,660 over 3y, 11% of budgetEastLine Players Corp: $14,250 over 2y, 12% of budgetISLIP ARTS COUNCIL INC: $11,160 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetEVOCO VOICE COLLECTIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetHAMPTONS TAKE 2 DOCUMENTARY FILM FESTIVAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetOLA OF EASTERN LONG ISLAND INC: $8,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSol y Sombra Spanish Dance Co: $7,750 over 1y, 21% of budgetBAY AREA FRIENDS OF THE FINE ARTS: $7,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBAY SHORE SCHOOLS ARTS EDUCATION FUND INC: $7,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSTAGE THE CHANGE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE JAM SESSION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NORTH SHORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $7,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetLONG ISLAND ORCHESTRA INC: $7,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetWALT WHITMAN BIRTHPLACE ASSOCIATION: $5,375 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCIRCULO DE LA HISPANIDAD INC: $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robert David Lion Gar…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Robert David Lion Gardiner Foundation IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robert David Lion Gardiner Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Huntington Arts Council Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Huntington Arts Council Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Huntington Arts Council Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Huntington Arts Council Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Huntington Arts Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home