Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hunt Alternatives

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$984k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$410k
Largest
01What it funds
0164% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$430kHealth$62kCrime & Legal$28kHuman Services$17kCivil Rights$7kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $301k
  • $250k+2 grants · $660k
$100,771
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc$409,706
Vital Voices$250,080
Conservatory Lab Charter School Foundation$200,000
National Center on Sexual Exploitation$100,771
Texas Womens Foundation$10,000
Colorado Women's Hall of Fame$10,000
Egyptian Study Society$2,080
Mighty Is Her Call$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $415k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BREAKING FREE: $2k → 14%The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc: $410k → 12%ORGANIZATION FOR PROSTITUTION SURVIVORS: $2k → 9%CASA MYNA VAZQUEZ: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MA
CA
CO
VA
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 93% of Hunt Alternatives’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 76% of the giving stays in DC; by stated purpose, 2%.

Hunt Alternativeslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$603k · 3 repeat orgs$550k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
17

Total granted

$603k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+31%

Still filing today

33%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $463k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureInternationalEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $531k · revenue +11%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2019–2021 · $62k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k

Funded once

  • CC
    COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
    one grant, 2019 · $24k
  • CH
    COURTNEYS HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Independent Women's Voice

Engage more individuals in legislative advocacy, educate them about the impact of public policies on their lives and our economy, and build support for policies that empower individuals by giving them greater freedom and autonomy.

Civil Rights
2
Stichting Womens Initiatives for Gender Justice

Ending impunity for conflict related sexual violence

International
3
Women Winning

To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.

Public Benefit
4
World Pulse Voices

World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…

Human Services
5
Woman Inc

W.O.M.A.N., Inc. supports survivors of domestic violence and their loved ones along their healing journeys, bridging value rich networks designed to address intersections of violence. In all our work, we strive to continually increase our…

Health
6
The Conversationalist
—
7
Coalition Against Trafficking in Women

The mission of the organization is to end the trafficking and sexual exploitation of women and girls worldwide. it promotes the human rights of women and girls by working internationally to combat commercial sexual exploitation in all its…

International
8
She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…

International
9
Every Woman Treaty Inc

Every Woman is a global coalition of more than 4,000 womens rights advocates and organisations in 165 nations advancing a treaty to end violence against women and girls in the form of a new Optional Protocol to CEDAW. We catalyse…

International
10
The Network Advocating Against Domestic Violence

The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…

Human Services
11
Mormon Women for Ethical Government

To inspire women of faith to be ambassadors of peace who transcend partisanship and courageously advocate for ethical government.

Human Services
12
Center for International Policy Inc

The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Organization for Prostitution Survivors; the most unlike its peers is Colorado Womens Hall of Fame. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION: $530,771 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATIONTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $409,706 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COL…+3 more: $5,250 · Human ServicesVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC: $250,080 · InternationalVITAL VOICES GLOBA…CONSERVATORY LAB FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · EducationCONSERVATORY L…Individual grant recipient: $61,885 · OtherIndividual g…COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE: $24,000 · OtherCOOK COUNTY …COURTNEYS HOUSE INC: $12,000 · OtherCOURTNEYS HO…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual g…Texas Women's Foundation: $10,000 · OtherTexas Women'…Colorado Womens Hall of Fame: $10,000 · OtherColorado Wom…+10 more: $41,830 · Other+10 moreEPIK PROJECT: $2,000 · Crime & LegalJUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC: $1,750 · Crime & LegalMassachusetts Voter Education Network Inc: $1,750 · Civil RightsMIGHTY IS HER CALL INC: $1,000 · Religion
Arts & Culture$530,771Human Services$414,956International$250,080Education$200,000Other$169,715Crime & Legal$3,750Civil Rights$1,750Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION: $530,771 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $409,706 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCONSERVATORY LAB FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetTexas Women's Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetColorado Womens Hall of Fame: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetEPIK PROJECT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCASA MYRNA VAZQUEZ INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Voter Education Network Inc: $1,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR PROSTITUTION SURVIVORS: $1,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIGHTY IS HER CALL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hunt Alternatives funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hunt Alternatives. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 48%
  • Justice Resource Institute Inc: 48% of income from government
  • Casa Myrna Vazquez Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hunt Alternatives?

Find your warmest path to Hunt Alternatives through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hunt Alternatives’ filings →

More from the funding graph