Skip to content
Hungary Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Hungary Foundation

To strengthen the understanding and cooperation between hungary and the united states of america.

$349k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$696kEducation$601kSocial Science$588kCivil Rights$357kArts & Culture$332kPublic Benefit$50kScience & Tech$39k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $131,277, the rows itemized in this filing. The $348,786 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $217,509 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $41k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$89,967
Median grant
1
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE OF WORLD POLITICS$89,967
THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES$41,310
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MAVEN 7 NETWORK RESEARCH INC: $39k → 16%CALIFORNIA EUROPEAN CULTURAL INITIATIVE: $30k → 9%ADAM GYORGY FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%HUNGARIAN AMERICAN COALITION: $100k → 14%QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $40k → 12%AMERICAN HUNGARIAN EDUCATORS ASSOCIATION: $35k → 8%HUNGARIAN HERITAGE HOUSE: $30k → 4%MOBILE ENGINE: $50k → 16%CALIFORNIA EUROPEAN CULTURAL INITIATIVE: $7k → 9%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR HUNGARIAN LITERATURE AND EDUCATION LTD: $10k → 17%HUNGARIAN AMERICAN COALITION: $80k → 14%QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $35k → 12%MOBILENGINE: $44k → 16%HUNGARIAN AMERICAN COALITION: $75k → 14%QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $26k → 12%MOBILE ENGINE: $27k → 16%HUNGARIAN AMERICAN COALITION: $70k → 14%QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $15k → 12%MOBILE ENGINE: $24k → 16%HUNGARIAN AMERICAN COALITION: $25k → 14%THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $100k → 14%THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $78k → 14%THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $70k → 14%THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $59k → 14%THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $47k → 14%THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $41k → 14%MERIDIAN HOUSE: $40k → 14%MERIDIAN HOUSE: $28k → 14%ATLANTIC COUNCIL: $158k → 14%THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $20k → 14%ATLANTIC COUNCIL: $55k → 14%HUDSON INSTITUTE: $154k → 14%HUDSON INSTITUTE: $122k → 14%CENTER FOR EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS: $121k → 14%HUDSON INSTITUTE: $82k → 14%HUDSON INSTITUTE: $15k → 14%CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES: $121k → 14%INSTITUTE OF WORLD POLITICS: $90k → 14%CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES: $118k → 14%CENTER FOR EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS: $65k → 14%CIS: $118k → 14%WHITE HOUSE WRITERS GROUP: $50k → 14%CENTER FOR EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS: $29k → 14%MCCAIN INSTITUTE: $70k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 10 repeat orgs$418k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$2.2M
$328k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+124%
+196%

Still filing today

90%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationSocial ScienceArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $415k · revenue +3%
  • HI
    Hudson Institute Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $373k · revenue +283%
  • HC
    HUNGARIAN-AMERICAN COALITION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $350k · revenue +232% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $70k · revenue +196%
  • AG
    ADAM GYORGY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • WH
    WHITE HOUSE WRITERS GROUP
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
2
Institute of Politics Policy and History
Education
3
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
4
Us - China Policy Foundation
—
5
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
6
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
7
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
8
Center for Advanced China Research
—
9
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
10
Center for Strategic Research and Communication
—
11
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
12
Global Interdependence Center

Gic brings together a network of international experts in policymaking, central banking, industry, and academia to explore issues and policies concerning global interdependence that impacts world economies and quality of life. we provide a…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for European Policy Analysis; the most unlike its peers is Central Eu California Cultural Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $415,384 · OtherTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIESHudson Institute Inc: $373,445 · OtherHudson Institute IncMOBILE ENGINE: $101,440 · OtherMOBILE ENGINEADAM GYORGY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherWHITE HOUSE WRITERS GROUP: $50,000 · OtherMOBILENGINE: $44,000 · OtherMAVEN 7 NETWORK RESEARCH INC: $39,000 · Other+3 more: $75,000 · Other+3 moreHUNGARIAN-AMERICAN COALITION: $350,000 · InternationalHUNGARIAN-AMERICAN COALITIONATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $213,000 · InternationalATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED…THE INSTITUTE OF WORLD POLITICS: $89,967 · InternationalTHE INSTITUTE OF WORLD POLITIC…MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER: $67,539 · InternationalMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTERCenter for Immigration Studies Inc: $356,950 · Civil RightsCenter for Immi…CENTER FOR EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS: $214,500 · Social ScienceCENTER FO…QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $115,860 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · EducationCENTRAL EU CALIFORNIA CULTURAL INSTITUTE: $37,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,148,269International$720,506Civil Rights$356,950Social Science$214,500Education$185,860Arts & Culture$37,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $415,384 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetHudson Institute Inc: $373,445 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCenter for Immigration Studies Inc: $356,950 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetHUNGARIAN-AMERICAN COALITION: $350,000 over 5y, 28% of budgetCENTER FOR EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS: $214,500 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $213,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $115,860 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF WORLD POLITICS: $89,967 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER: $67,539 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR HUNGARIAN LITERATURE AND: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hungary Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hungary Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Quinnipiac University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hungary Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hungary Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hungary’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home