Skip to content

Wisconsin · Public charity

Humorology Inc

To promote community engagement and philanthropic service through creativity and dedication.

$620k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2024
100%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$620,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$620,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 2
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$42k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 100% of the organizations Humorology Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $501k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$620k100%
FY20241$501k100%
FY20231$536k100%
FY20221$450k100%
FY20211$145k100%
FY20201$345k100%
FY20192$397k50%
FY20181$228k100%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.0MHealth$1.0MFood & Nutrition$345kHousing & Shelter$234kYouth Development$145k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Where it is load-bearing

Humorology Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 5 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 9 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSafe Harbor Child Advocacy Center Inc: $620,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetCanopy Center Inc: $536,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetLogan James Herr Foundation Inc: $501,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetRise Wisconsin Inc: $449,831 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetBadger Childhood Cancer Network Inc: $390,520 over 1y, 96% of budgetBlessings in a Backpack Inc: $344,808 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNeighborhood House Community Center Inc: $233,544 over 2y, 54% of budgetThe Rainbow Project Inc: $195,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetBig Brothers and Big Sisters of Dane County Inc: $145,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Endres Manufacturing Foundation IncWI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Endres Manufacturing Foundation Inc · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · The Evjue Foundation Inc · Madison Community Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · 100 Men of Dane County Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Humorology Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Humorology Inc?

Find your warmest path to Humorology Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Humorology Inc

How much does Humorology Inc give?
Humorology Inc reported 1 grants totaling $620,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 2 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Humorology Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (37%), Health (37%), Food & Nutrition (12%).
Who are Humorology Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Safe Harbor Child Advocacy Center Inc ($620k), Canopy Center Inc ($536k), Logan James Herr Foundation Inc ($501k).
Does Humorology Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Humorology Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Endres Manufacturing Foundation Inc, Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc, The Evjue Foundation Inc.
Where is Humorology Inc based?
Humorology Inc is based in WI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Humorology’s filings →

More from the funding graph