Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Humorology Inc

To promote community engagement and philanthropic service through creativity and dedication.

$501k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$501k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$1.0MHealth$1.0MFood & Nutrition$345kHousing & Shelter$234kYouth Development$145k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$501,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOGAN JAMES HERR FOUNDATION INC$501,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $345k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $345k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Manitowoc County Inc

To provide children facing adversity with strong, enduring, professionally supported one on one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.

2
Bradens Hope for Childhood Cancer Inc

Raise awareness, fund research grants to find treatments and cure childhood cancer

Health
3
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Harrisonburg Rockingham County Inc

To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

4
Big Brothers & Sisters of Butte

Big brothers big sisters is the only prevention program in montana proven to affect a broad range of social issues. program evaluations consistently show that after entering the program, children are less likely to become delinquent, use…

5
Dane County Parent Council Inc

Dane county parent council changes the lives of underserved children and families through education and supportive services.

Education
6
Greater Wyoming Big Brothers Big Sisters

To provide children facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.

7
Rainbow Childcare of Monroe Inc

Rainbow Childcare Inc. is a not for profit child care agency committed to providing quality, affordable, learning-oriented child care to the greater Green County community. We serve the children enrolled at Rainbow Childcare, Inc. and…

Human Services
8
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Montana

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

9
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Big Bend Inc

To provide children facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.

10
Minnesota Chapter of the National Childrens Alliance

The Minnesota Children's Alliance leads the development and growth of locally based children's advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams to ensure equitable access to services for healing and growth.

Crime & Legal
11
Randolph County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

To facilitate investigation and prosecution of child abuse perpetrators; provide services to victimized children and families; and educate the community.

Crime & Legal
12
Blount County Children's Advocacy Center Inc

To provide a child-friendly, home environment in a safe and natural setting while child abuse victims and their non-offending family members/guardians can receive comprehensive and coordinated services from the agencies comprising the…

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canopy Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Badger Childhood Cancer Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LOGAN JAMES HERR FOUNDATION INC — $501,000 · Human ServicesLOGAN JAMES HERR FOUNDATION INCBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $344,808 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INCRISE WISCONSIN INC — $449,831 · HealthRISE WISCONSIN INCBadger Childhood Cancer Network Inc — $390,520 · HealthBadger Childhood Cancer Network In…CANOPY CENTER INC — $536,000 · Crime & LegalCANOPY CENTER INCTHE RAINBOW PROJECT INC — $195,000 · OtherTHE RAINBOW P…BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF DANE COUNTY INC — $145,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS …Neighborhood House Community Center Inc — $233,544 · Youth DevelopmentNeighborh…
Human Services$845,808Health$840,351Crime & Legal$536,000Other$340,000Youth Development$233,544

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCANOPY CENTER INC — $536,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetLOGAN JAMES HERR FOUNDATION INC — $501,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetRISE WISCONSIN INC — $449,831 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetBadger Childhood Cancer Network Inc — $390,520 over 1y, 96% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $344,808 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNeighborhood House Community Center Inc — $233,544 over 2y, 54% of budgetTHE RAINBOW PROJECT INC — $195,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF DANE COUNTY INC — $145,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Endres Manufacturing Foundation IncWI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Endres Manufacturing Foundation Inc · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · The Evjue Foundation Inc · Madison Community Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · 100 Men of Dane County Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Humorology Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Humorology Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Humorology Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph