Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hume Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MHealth$175kEducation$135kArts & Culture$20kFood & Nutrition$20kYouth Development$20kAnimals$10kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $225k
  • $250k+1 grant · $750k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Quail Springs Baptist Church$750,000
Delta Gamma Foundation$125,000
Riverbend Church$100,000
Savannah Station TRP$15,000
SPE Foundation$10,000
Horatio Alger Association$10,000
Special Care$10,000
Loaves and Fishes NW Oklahoma$10,000
Bat City Archery$10,000
Sisu Youth Services$10,000
Infant Crisis Services$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
The City of Oklahoma City Animal Welfare$5,000
Austin Pets Alive$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Sisu Youth Services: $10k → 16%Sisu Youth Services: $10k → 16%Infant Crisis Services: $5k → 16%Special Care: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 4 repeat orgs$350k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$65k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $285k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QS
    Quail Springs Baptist Church
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.3M
  • SS
    Savannah Station TRP Incorporation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $115k · revenue +5%
  • LA
    Loaves and Fishes NW Oklahoma
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k

Funded once

  • OH
    OU Health - HH Diabetes Center
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • FO
    Friends of Lamar Orchestra
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sisu of Georgia Inc

To serve children with disabilities and their typical peers through state-of-the art educational, therapeutic, nursing and family support services in an integrated environment.

—
2
Society of Photo Optical Instrumentation Engineers

SPIE is an international nonprofit technical society dedicated to advancing scientific research and engineering applications of optical, photonic, imaging and optoelectronic technologies through its meetings, education programs and…

—
3
Scholarship America Inc

See schedule oscholarship america is a national education service organization. . we're committed to creating a world where every student can access the resources they need to learn, grow, and succeed. our expert approach and focus on…

Education
4
Southeastern Universities Research Association Inc

Sura's mission is to advance collaborative research and education and to strengthen the scientific capabilities of its members and our nation.

Science & Tech
5
American Pediatric Surgical Association

The mission of the american pediatric surgical association is to ensure optimal pediatric surgical care of patients and their families, to promote excellence in the field, and to foster a vibrant and viable community of pediatric surgeons.

—
6
South University - Member Inc
Education
7
Special Parents Information Network of Santa Cruz County

The purpose of the organization is to help children with special needs achieve their full potential by offering support, information and resources which strengthen and empower their families and the professionals that serve them.

Human Services
8
Society for Pediatric Radiology

The society is committed to improving health care of the pediatric patient through imaging, and education and dissemination of information to all pediatric healthcare providers who utilize radiological imaging techniques.

Health
9
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

Incorporated in 1952 as a non-profit organization, siam has worked toward the following goals for more than 70 years:-to advance the application of mathematics and computational science to engineering, industry, science, and society;-to…

Science & Tech
10
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Inc (Siop)

The society's mission is to enhance human well-being and performance in organizational and work settings by promoting the science, practice, and teaching of industrial-organizational psychology.

—
11
Society of Plastics Engineers Inc

The society of plastics engineers (spe) supports people and companies in the plastics industry, by producing programs which facilitate the sharing of knowledge, the strengthening of skills and the promotion of the plastics industry…

Science & Tech
12
Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children

Provides college scholarships and mentoring programs for deserving low-income children whose household income falls below 185% of the federal poverty guidelines from middle school through college.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delta Gamma Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Spe Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Quail Springs Baptist Church: $1,250,000 · OtherQuail Springs Baptist ChurchRIVERBEND BAPTIST CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherRIVERBEND BAPTIST CHURCHOU Health - HH Diabetes Center: $50,000 · Other+5 more: $55,000 · OtherSavannah Station TRP Incorporation: $115,000 · Human ServicesSavannah …SISU YOUTH INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesSISU YOUT…SPECIAL CARE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL C…INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $125,000 · EducationHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC: $10,000 · EducationBat City Archery: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $5,000 · Animals
Other$1,455,000Human Services$150,000Education$135,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSavannah Station TRP Incorporation: $115,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetSISU YOUTH INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBat City Archery: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hume Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hume Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Special Care Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hume Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph