Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hume Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20242025.

Religion$1.4MHealth$175kEducation$135kArts & Culture$20kFood & Nutrition$20kYouth Development$20kAnimals$10kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $225k
  • $250k+1 grant · $750k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Quail Springs Baptist Church$750,000
Delta Gamma Foundation$125,000
Riverbend Church$100,000
Savannah Station TRP$15,000
Horatio Alger Association$10,000
Special Care$10,000
Loaves and Fishes NW Oklahoma$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Sisu Youth Services$10,000
SPE Foundation$10,000
Infant Crisis Services$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
The City of Oklahoma City Animal Welfare$5,000
Austin Pets Alive$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Sisu Youth Services: $10k → 16%Sisu Youth Services: $10k → 16%Infant Crisis Services: $5k → 16%Special Care: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 4 repeat orgs$350k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$65k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $285k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QS
    Quail Springs Baptist Church
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.3M
  • SS
    Savannah Station TRP Incorporation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $115k · revenue +5%
  • LA
    Loaves and Fishes NW Oklahoma
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k

Funded once

  • OH
    OU Health - HH Diabetes Center
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • FO
    Friends of Lamar Orchestra
    one grant, 2024 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sisu of Georgia Inc

To serve children with disabilities and their typical peers through state-of-the art educational, therapeutic, nursing and family support services in an integrated environment.

2
Society of Photo Optical Instrumentation Engineers

SPIE is an international nonprofit technical society dedicated to advancing scientific research and engineering applications of optical, photonic, imaging and optoelectronic technologies through its meetings, education programs and…

3
Scholarship America Inc

See schedule oscholarship america is a national education service organization. . we're committed to creating a world where every student can access the resources they need to learn, grow, and succeed. our expert approach and focus on…

Education
4
Southeastern Universities Research Association Inc

Sura's mission is to advance collaborative research and education and to strengthen the scientific capabilities of its members and our nation.

Science & Tech
5
American Pediatric Surgical Association

The mission of the american pediatric surgical association is to ensure optimal pediatric surgical care of patients and their families, to promote excellence in the field, and to foster a vibrant and viable community of pediatric surgeons.

6
South University - Member Inc
Education
7
Special Parents Information Network of Santa Cruz County

The purpose of the organization is to help children with special needs achieve their full potential by offering support, information and resources which strengthen and empower their families and the professionals that serve them.

Human Services
8
Society for Pediatric Radiology

The society is committed to improving health care of the pediatric patient through imaging, and education and dissemination of information to all pediatric healthcare providers who utilize radiological imaging techniques.

Health
9
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

Incorporated in 1952 as a non-profit organization, siam has worked toward the following goals for more than 70 years:-to advance the application of mathematics and computational science to engineering, industry, science, and society;-to…

Science & Tech
10
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Inc (Siop)

The society's mission is to enhance human well-being and performance in organizational and work settings by promoting the science, practice, and teaching of industrial-organizational psychology.

11
Society of Plastics Engineers Inc

The society of plastics engineers (spe) supports people and companies in the plastics industry, by producing programs which facilitate the sharing of knowledge, the strengthening of skills and the promotion of the plastics industry…

Science & Tech
12
Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children

Provides college scholarships and mentoring programs for deserving low-income children whose household income falls below 185% of the federal poverty guidelines from middle school through college.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delta Gamma Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Spe Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Quail Springs Baptist Church — $1,250,000 · OtherQuail Springs Baptist ChurchRIVERBEND BAPTIST CHURCH — $100,000 · OtherRIVERBEND BAPTIST CHURCHOU Health - HH Diabetes Center — $50,000 · Other+6 more — $65,000 · OtherSavannah Station TRP Incorporation — $115,000 · Human ServicesSavannah …SISU YOUTH INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesSISU YOUT…SPECIAL CARE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL C…INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION — $125,000 · EducationHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC — $10,000 · EducationAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $5,000 · Animals
Other$1,465,000Human Services$150,000Education$135,000Animals$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSavannah Station TRP Incorporation — $115,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetSISU YOUTH INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Savannah Station TRP Incorporation
  • Who funds SISU YOUTH INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC
  • Who funds HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC
  • Who funds SPE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hume Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Special Care Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph