Skip to content

California · Public charity

Human-I-T

Create equitable access to opportunity by providing devices, internet access, digital skills training, and tech support for communities left on the wrong side of the digital divide.

$3.8M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$50k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$50,000
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$17M
50% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$50kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Detroit Housing Commission$50,0001n/a

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AT&T FoundationTX45.6× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AT&T Foundation · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Comerica Charitable Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Bothin Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Ross Stores Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Charles Schwab Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Human-I-T with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Human-I-T?

Find your warmest path to Human-I-T through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Human-I-T

How much does Human-I-T give?
Human-I-T reported 1 itemized grants totaling $50,000, out of $3,814,008 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Human-I-T fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2024, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (8%).
Who are Human-I-T's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2024: Detroit Housing Commission ($50k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Human-I-T?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include AT&T Foundation, Boys & Girls Clubs of America, Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return).
Where is Human-I-T based?
Human-I-T is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Human-I-T’s filings →

More from the funding graph