Skip to content

· Private foundation

Human Arc Family Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2019
43
Grants FY2019
6
States reached
$93k
Largest
01What it funds
0156% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Human Services$123kHealth$75kFood & Nutrition$66kEducation$11kYouth Development$5kHousing & Shelter$4kCommunity Improvement$3kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2019 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k40 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $93k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTAURI HEALTH SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION$92,572
ORLANDO HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$10,000
ROBIN SHARI PARKER HAPPI FOUNDATION INC$10,000
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS$6,000
SUMMACARE INC$5,000
KEOGH HEALTH CONNECTION$5,000
CORTNEY'S PLACE$5,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$5,000
NEW PATHWAYS FOR YOUTH INC$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
DILIGENT ACHIEVERS WITH NEEDS$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
RESTORATION HOUSE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$2,705
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%ROBIN SHARI PARKER HAPPI FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 13%SUB ZERO MISSION: $5k → 9%CORTNEY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%CORTNEY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
OH
PA
CA
MO
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$114k · 11 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2019, 4 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
23

Total granted

$114k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+22%

Still filing today

55%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $153k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KH
    KEOGH HEALTH CONNECTION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $19k · revenue +51%
  • GL
    GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK
    3× · 2017–2019 · $16k · revenue +37%
  • OH
    Orlando Health Foundation Inc
    2× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +358%

Funded once

  • Feeding Americagraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $26k · revenue +84%
  • TS
    THE SUB ZERO MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +168%
  • AA
    ALS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Conquering Congenital Heart Disease

At conquering chd we exist to conquerin the most common birth defect. we engage, listen, learn, and act. we create visibility and empower all impacted by chd. we accomplish this through awareness, knowledge, community and research.

Health
4
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
Nuvance Health

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
7
Bionexus Kc

We inspire thinkers from different disciplines to combine their efforts for a common purpose: healthcare innovation.(continued on schedule o)from bioinformatics to cancer research and beyond, we stimulate collaboration and help bring…

Science & Tech
8
Rochester Regional Health

The organization is organized and operated for the benefit of all of the affiliates within rochester regional health system. the organization supports and assists the affiliates by reviewing and monitoring their missions, objectives,…

Health
9
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
10
OhioHealth Corporation Group Return

To improve the health of those we serve.

Health
11
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
12
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Baldrick's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Robin Shari Parker Happi Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEOGH HEALTH CONNECTION: $19,000 · OtherKEOGH HEALTH CONNECTIONHARVESTERS COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $9,200 · OtherHARVESTERS COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORKUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $6,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALSSUMMACARE INC: $5,000 · OtherALS ASSOCIATION: $4,300 · Other+51 more: $61,329 · Other+51 moreCENTAURI HEALTH SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION: $92,572 · PhilanthropyCENTAURI HEALTH SOLUTIONS FOUNDA…+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyFeeding America: $25,702 · Food & NutritionFeeding AmericaGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK: $15,754 · Food & NutritionGREATER LANSING FOO…GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CLEVELAND F…Orlando Health Foundation Inc: $15,000 · HealthOrlando Health…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $13,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T…American Heart Association Inc: $12,500 · HealthAmerican Heart…+1 more: $700 · HealthROBIN SHARI PARKER HAPPI FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCORTNEYS PLACE: $9,500 · Human ServicesTHE SUB ZERO MISSION: $4,728 · Human ServicesBETTER FAMILY LIFE INC: $3,258 · Community ImprovementNew Pathways For Youth: $3,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$104,829Philanthropy$93,072Food & Nutrition$56,456Health$41,200Human Services$24,228Community Improvement$3,258Crime & Legal$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFeeding America: $25,702 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEOGH HEALTH CONNECTION: $19,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK: $15,754 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN SHARI PARKER HAPPI FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCORTNEYS PLACE: $9,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SUB ZERO MISSION: $4,728 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBETTER FAMILY LIFE INC: $3,258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S RECOVERY CENTER: $3,073 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNew Pathways For Youth: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRESTORATION HOUSE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $2,705 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSWIFT YOUTH FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetESPERANZA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTAURI HEALTH SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds KEOGH HEALTH CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Orlando Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN SHARI PARKER HAPPI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CORTNEYS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds THE SUB ZERO MISSION ↗
  • Who funds BETTER FAMILY LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S RECOVERY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
  • Who funds RESTORATION HOUSE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds SWIFT YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centauri Health Solutions FoundationAZ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centauri Health Solutions Foundation · Network for Good · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Human Arc Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Human Arc Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Human Arc Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Human Arc Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Human Arc Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph