· Private foundation
Hugh M Inman Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k43 grants · $140k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $140k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE | $50,000 |
| PEACHTREE CHURCH | $25,000 |
| MCR FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| ST SIMONS ISLAND LAND TRUST | $15,000 |
| FAITH LUTHERAN | $15,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $10,000 |
| CHEROKEE EMPLOYEE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE MOUNT VERNON SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| K9s FOR WARRIORS | $10,000 |
| CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PACE ACADEMY | $7,500 |
| FAIRWAYS FOR FREEDOM | $7,500 |
| CARNEGIE HALL | $6,036 |
| FAMILY PROMISE | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $158k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
80 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE9× · 2017–2025 · $345k · revenue +9%
- NENSORO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC6× · 2017–2025 · $166k · revenue +224%
- CUCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +143%
Funded once
- CGCASA GLYNN INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue ×6,670
- MFMUSC FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $25k
- AFANGEL FLIGHT SOARS INCone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To perpetuate a village community to provide progressive life assistance to adults with developmental disabilities so that they can maximize their abilities and maintain their independence in the least restrictive environment.
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
Acfb charitable investments, inc., is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes and/or activities of atlanta community food bank, inc., a georgia nonprofit corporation.
Our new mission is: advocates for children is an organization of dedicated, skilled professionals and compassionate volunteers committed to the well-being of children, youth and families. through comprehensive advocacy and unwavering…
The mission of the grady health foundation is to grow both philanthropic support and broad-based understanding of the critical role that grady health system plays in the metro atlanta region. our focus is to ensure grady health system has…
Our mission is to create life-changing solutions for people with disabilities.
Acfb support organization, inc., is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes and/or activities of atlanta community food bank, inc., a georgia nonprofit corporation.
Founded in 1948, visiting nurse health system is georgia's solution to healthcare and aging at home. for over 75 years, visiting nurse has served as georgia's first and largest nonprofit provider of health and hospice care in the home, and…
Atlanta habitat for humanity transforms communities by acting as a catalyst for neighborhood revitalization through education, innovative development, partnerships, and long term relationships with families.
Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.
To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.
The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Georgia Inc and the most unlike its peers is Angels Among Us. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 188 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NSORO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FUTURE FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds PILGRIM MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Red River Valley Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds Piedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds LES FELDICK MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds PACE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds MIDTOWN ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds HABERSHAM CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds CASA GLYNN INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHEROKEE EMPLOYEE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT SOARS INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST SIMONS LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds SHARING & CARING INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · Fraser-Parker Foundation · The Choate Foundation (Fka Choate Bridges Foundation) · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Ryan Ida Alice Tuw Main · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Smurfit Westrock US Foundation F/K/A Westrock Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hugh M Inman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Anchorage Children's Home of Bay County Inc — 14% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hugh M Inman Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Hugh M Inman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.