· Private foundation
Hugh and Charlotte Maclellan Charitable Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $165k
- $10k–50k53 grants · $851k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $450k
- $250k+1 grant · $532k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION DBA THE GENEROSITY TRUST | $531,500 |
| CUMBERLAND HEIGHTS FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| WEST NASHVILLE DREAM CENTER | $100,000 |
| WEST NASHVILLE DREAM CENTER | $100,000 |
| SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC | $100,000 |
| FOCUS ON THE FAMILY | $50,000 |
| CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC | $45,000 |
| RESTORATION SOUTHSIDE CHURCH | $40,000 |
| CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC | $40,000 |
| COVENANT COLLEGE INC | $30,000 |
| MISSION INCREASE | $25,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE CHATTANOOGA | $25,000 |
| PLIES | $25,000 |
| CENTER FOR STRATEGIC MINISTRY | $25,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE CHATTANOOGA | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
112 repeat relationships — 62 still active in FY2025, 50 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $270k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WNWEST NASHVILLE DREAM CENTER6× · 2018–2025 · $960k · revenue +220% · 36% of their budget
- CCCHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC9× · 2017–2025 · $761k · revenue +135%
- CCCOVENANT COLLEGE9× · 2017–2025 · $440k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- WNWEST NASHVILLE DREAM CENTERone grant, 2024 · $250k
- NPNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST (UBS OPTIMUS FOUNDATION)one grant, 2020 · $50k
- SSSNOWBOARDERS & SKIERS FOR CHRISTone grant, 2024 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.
To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.
Every generation minstries is an international, interdenominational, christian organization which ministers together with local churches to develop effective ministry to children and families. the organization strives to equip overseas…
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures
Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…
The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…
To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.
With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chalmers Center for Economic Development and the most unlike its peers is Prison Prevention Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 172 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE ↗
- Who funds WEST NASHVILLE DREAM CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds CHATT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRAINING GROUND ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds HOSANNA ↗
- Who funds EHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SNOWBOARDERS & SKIERS FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds NATIONS MINISTRY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
- Who funds Precept ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds PLIES ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds PREP PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Elam Ministries ↗
- Who funds The House University Ministries ↗
- Who funds THIRD MILLENNIUM MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
- Who funds THE NEXT DOOR INC ↗
- Who funds ENTRUST ↗
- Who funds REFUGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPERATION ANDREW GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHEPHERD'S ARMS RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds Praxis Inc ↗
- Who funds Givers Legacy Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc · Robert L & Kathrina H Maclellan Founda Foundation · Weldon F Osborne Foundation Inc · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Robert F Stone Foundation AKA Bobby Stone Foundation · Hamico Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hugh and Charlotte Maclellan Charitable Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hugh and Charlotte Maclellan Charitable Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Hugh and Charlotte Maclellan Charitable Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.