Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hudson Charitable Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$112kHealth$96kHuman Services$36kYouth Development$12kFood & Nutrition$9kInternational$9kPhilanthropy$9kCivil Rights$6k
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,389
Median grant
14
States reached
$688k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JESUIT INTERNATIONAL MISSION$4,632
BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF MT ANGEL$2,316
ARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND IN OREGON$2,316
NATIONAL FND FOR CANCER RESEARCH$2,316
SALESIANS OF ST JOHN BOSCO$2,316
MOUNT ANGEL ABBEY AND SEMINARY$2,316
CATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOC$2,316
ST MARYS CHURCH$2,316
FIRST CANDLE INC$1,726
CARE USA INC$1,389
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$1,389
CHILDRENS LEUKEMIA RESEARCH ASSOC$1,389
EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC$1,389
THE SALVATION ARMY A CALIFORNIA CORP$1,389
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$1,389
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
OR
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$276k · 30 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
3

Total granted

$276k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+9%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $926 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $9k · revenue +215%
  • American Diabetes Association
    7× · 2019–2025 · $9k · revenue +4%
  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $9k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • SA
    SIDS ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • FF
    Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +9%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $800
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
6
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
7
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
8
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
10
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
11
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
12
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parkinson's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JESUIT INTERNATIONAL MISSION: $30,040 · OtherJESUIT INTERNATIONAL MISSIONST MARYS CHURCH: $15,647 · OtherST MARYS CHURCHCATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOC INC: $15,020 · OtherCATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOC INCSALESIANS OF ST JOHN BOSCO: $15,020 · OtherSALESIANS OF ST JOHN BOSCOBENEDICTINE SISTERS CORP: $15,020 · OtherBENEDICTINE SISTERS CORPNATIONAL FND FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $15,020 · OtherNATIONAL FND FOR CANCER RESEARCHARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND IN OREGON: $15,020 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND IN OREGONMOUNT ANGEL ABBEY AND SEMINARY: $15,020 · OtherMOUNT ANGEL ABBEY AND SEMINARYBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $9,387 · OtherChildrens Leukemia Research Assn Inc: $9,011 · OtherUNITED WAY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY: $8,739 · Other+12 more: $49,735 · Other+12 moreAmerican Diabetes Association: $9,011 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Asso…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $9,011 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLE…EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $9,011 · HealthEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF…FIRST CANDLE INC: $7,308 · HealthFIRST CANDLE INCPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $6,008 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $6,008 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDA…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $6,008 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $5,208 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIAT…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $9,011 · InternationalBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $6,008 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED: $2,400 · Youth DevelopmentFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,032 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $272 · Philanthropy
Other$212,679Health$57,573International$9,011Youth Development$8,408Human Services$1,032Philanthropy$272

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $9,387 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $9,011 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $9,011 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $9,011 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $9,011 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Leukemia Research Assn Inc: $9,011 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY: $8,739 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST CANDLE INC: $7,308 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $6,008 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $6,008 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $6,008 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $6,008 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $6,008 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS OF OREGON: $6,008 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $5,208 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,032 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $272 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Leukemia Research Assn Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FIRST CANDLE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS OF OREGON ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hudson Charitable Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hudson Charitable Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Easter Seals of Oregon: 77% of income from government
  • First Candle Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America: 22% of income from government
  • United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hudson Charitable Tuw’s filings →

More from the funding graph